Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 13 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:GarimaBhatia_Green-tailed_Sunbird_MG_1191.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Green-tailed sunbird (Aethopyga nipalensis) clicked in Bhutan. By User:Gbhati --PJeganathan 05:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 06:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Should be speedy declined, as it's not close to the minimum size of 2 megapixels. -- Ikan Kekek 07:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Indeed, get it outta here.--Peulle 14:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Below 2 MP. --Basotxerri (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Sibbesse,_Friedrich-Busse-Schule_--_2017_--_7446.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Friedrich Busse school, Sibbesse, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I like to see the whole building, left crop is not well done --Michielverbeek 05:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm sorry that you can't see the whole building. I'm using a focal length of 11 mm and there are a lot of windows on the right and on the left. It's impossible with one photograph, may be with a panorama. And it was impossible to go a step backward without a fence in front of the lens. --XRay 18:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment The size of a building may dictate whether it's possible to shoot the whole building from a certain angle; I wouldn't decline the image for cropping out parts of a building. In this case you might specify in the description that it's the entrance to the building we're seeing.--Peulle 15:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thank you. I've modified the description. --XRay 15:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Yep.--Peulle 22:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good enough for QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Himalayan_Wilderness.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kongma La Pass Lake (5,500 m) in Everest region seen from the top Kongma La Pass. (By Pravinmeshra) --Biplab Anand 17:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Imo very good quality --Rabax63 19:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Severe CAs erverywhere --Llez 19:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great motif but shadows are too dark. --Milseburg 11:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Kapelle Mörtersdorf.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ortskapelle Mörtersdorf, Gemeinde Rosenburg-Mold / Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The large tree on the right side is distracting. Also, the image looks tilted. --Shishir 15:36 (UTC)
 CommentThe "large tree" is a Maypole ("Maibaum"). --Manfred Kuzel 17:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Sorry! I made a typo, not the left but the right one. --Shishir 1:30 (UTC)
Tut mit leid, mein Englisch ist nicht so gut, daß ich das verstehe. Fakt ist, daß ich das Foto gerade wegen des schief stehenden Maibaums gemacht habe.--Manfred Kuzel 04:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Der Baum im Hintergrund rechts ist gemeint. Der macht das Bild sehr dunkel und lenkt vom Hauptmotiv (Kirche und Maibaum) ab. Versuch doch einen anderen Bildausschnitt. Gruß --Dirtsc 11:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Das Kirchlein kippt nach links, sonst ist das Bild o.k. Ein anderer Bildausschnitt wäre wohl besser.--Ermell 07:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
    * Perspektive und Bildausschnitt geändert und neue Version hochgeladen. Mir gefällt die alte Version dennoch besser, ist wohl Geschmackssache. Danke jedenfalls für die Meinungen.--Manfred Kuzel 12:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Der schiefe Maibaum stört sehr, auch wenn Du ihn originell fandest. Für mich ist er ein Grund, ebenfalls kein Pro zu geben. Die Kirche kippt meines Erachtens nicht nach links. Es ist der Eindruck, der durch die hier immer wieder geforderte Korrektur der Perspektive entsteht, die oft nicht dem natürlichen Sehempfinden entspricht. -- Spurzem 14:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Die rechte Seite ist wirklich schief nach links. Die linke Seite ist senkrecht. Dadurch entsteht der Eindruck, dass alles nach links kippt. Außerdem finde ich persönlich die Schatten immer noch zu dunkel. Und von irgendwoher kommen auch Streifen im Himmelsblau. Kriegt man aber vielleicht noch korrigiert. Gruß --Dirtsc 06:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The sky looks ... posterized, isn't that the word?--Peulle 20:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Striations in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 07:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Or "striations", yes, maybe that's a better word. :) --Peulle 15:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Starry_night_in_Langtang.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Milky way above lodge in Laurebina - Langtang national park. By (Q-lieb-in) --Biplab Anand 06:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality, given the extremely difficult cirumstances --Martin Falbisoner 07:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I'm not opposing at this time, but I think we should discuss this picture, because the curvature of the earth and earth-bound things like the lodge looks bizarre, but the sky is beautiful. Is this acceptable to a consensus here? -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noise considering the small resolution; it's been downsampled quite a bit.--Peulle 12:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Not perfect, but an amazing shot. --Palauenc05 20:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I don't think I can accept this degree of warping of the space. -- Ikan Kekek 23:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unusual shot but quality doesn´t reach QI-level. --Milseburg 11:41, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)