Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 10 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Praterstern_in_Vienna,_Monument_for_Admiral_Tegetthoff-4969.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination One of the six side figures at the main column of the Tegetthoff-Monument in Vienna --Hubertl 14:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I'm not sure I agree and I'd like to take this to CR: This is merely a detail of the monument in question, so for me it's one out of two: if the detail is the subject, the crop should be tighter on the left: right now, you're getting half a column, which looks wrong. If the whole memorial is the subject, the image should zoom out a lot. --Peulle 09:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Description changed, the crop is acceptable, I think. It shows a part of the construction itself. --Hubertl 10:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support It's fine for me. --Palauenc05 17:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, better now that it's clear that only a detail is the subject. --Peulle 09:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Auens vei 11 (2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Auens rd. 11 in Drammen, built in 1875. --Peulle 22:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • {{s}} Good quality. --Hubertl 22:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Looks over all too unsharp. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose You are right, Tobias! --Hubertl 05:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp and blurred. If possible, please try again from RAW-file --Michielverbeek 06:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Stublang-5295233.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Sandstone in Stublang --Ermell 10:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, burnt sky --A.Savin 01:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment The sky is bright but not burnt when you look at the histogram.--Ermell 08:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Like A.Savin --Michielverbeek 21:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I think this is a dull grey sky but it isn't burnt. OK for a QI for me. --Basotxerri 20:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Support per Basotxerri --Moroder 09:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Part of the silhouttes of the leaves is gone, not QI to me like this Poco a poco 19:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)