Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 31 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Gr._Pirogov_in_Khimki_Reservoir_2016-05-10_Pic_12.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Gr. Pirogov in Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 13:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Bad top crop, not repairable --Michielverbeek 17:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment I disagree. 1. The lighting pillar is minor object and fully visible. The top of the pillar doesn't affect the perception of the main object. 2.It's repairable if other wikipedians ask to fix. --Mike1979 Russia 18:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 16:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 19:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Halluin_port_industriel.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of the river port of Halluin, France --Velvet 06:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ship should be categorized --Mike1979 Russia 08:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thank you for your review --Velvet 10:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
      • Sorry, but  Not done. I have created the proper category for the ship. --LexKurochkin 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
        • Thanks, I hadn't realized that there could be a category for each barge. --Velvet 06:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
          • You're welcome. Yes, we have individual categories for every ship, every aircraft and even for every hot air balloon. --LexKurochkin 16:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support --LexKurochkin 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mike1979 Russia (talk) 06:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good photo. Thanks for adding the category, Lex. -- Ikan Kekek 01:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 19:34, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

File:20230711_GrossePechlibelle_PaarungsRad_IschnuraElegans_mating_DSC01541_PtrQs.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mating Blue-tailed damselfies (Ischnura Elegans), Lower Saxony/Germany --PtrQs 22:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 23:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose male in shadow --Charlesjsharp 18:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment That's like a silhouette. This focuses on the coloured female species and emphasises the connections within the wheel without distraction by the second individuum. --PtrQs (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support --GRDN711 18:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable, per PtrQs' explanation above. -- Ikan Kekek 01:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 19:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Lambersart_vue_briqueterie_vestiges.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of the remains of the brickyard, in Lambersart, France --Velvet 06:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose IMHO too much foreground, fixable? --F. Riedelio 06:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good enough to me. --Sebring12Hrs 05:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Bottom and top crop please --Michielverbeek 05:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
    • Thank you for your reviews, but I prefer this format --Velvet 10:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Suggestions for improvement are not a reason for rejection.--Ermell 20:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC) Sorry, you are right --Michielverbeek 20:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ermell. Perfectly fine, and I like that the foreground is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 02:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 19:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)