Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 27 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Datsun_260Z_2016-09-03_13-59-28.jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --W.carter 08:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlayaCametatardecer1MDP-jul2017.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Camet Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 22:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline There are at least four creepy animals (dust spots) on your sensor - just above the horizon. --PtrQs 23:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Ezarate 02:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Not done there still are dust spots, see comments to 'PlayaCametMDP3-jul2017.jpg'. You really should check your sensor to save time of checking images - mine and yours . --PtrQs 00:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Ezarate 22:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment If you are using lightroom and are not used to a exact local correction, you should rather use the 'correction mode' than the 'copy mode'. This will avoid non-fitting patterns as your broken cloud over the left annotated dust particle; The other annotated spots are still present. Btw: your last correction was connected with massive loss in sharpness and the new crop with the half cut-off cabin spoils the scene. As I don't want to rate too many of your images, I will leave the evaluation to others in discussion. --PtrQs 21:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unclean work.--Ermell (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This has been a problem with your images of late. I really think you should consider having your equipment professionally cleaned, or (if impossible) maybe it's time to think about buying a new camera? Clearly, it's not a skill problem, it's an equipment problem, and it's not going away unless you do something about it.--Peulle 14:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 01:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)