Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 21 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Нічний_охоронець.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lucanus cervus. By User:84Human84 --Anntinomy 09:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry too unsharp, but I like the principle of this photo. --Olivier LPB 09:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k for me. Not everything has to be sharp in this case. --Ermell 21:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I personally feel that there is too much noise. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Clarification: It seems that the "noise" I see is from too much pixel sharpening. Major artifacts that I thought was noise on the beetle. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much unsharpness. --Fischer.H 07:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ermell --Sandro Halank 13:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Вид_на_Бабуган_яйлу_з_Еклізі-Бурун.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chatyr-Dah, a mountainous massif in Crimea. By User:Vian --Anntinomy 09:00, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 09:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perhaps FP, but overprocessed to be QI IMO. Oversaturated... But very nice artistic picture--Lmbuga 17:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose + damaged file/upload --Tsungam 06:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lmbuga and Tsungam. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:50, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A beautiful Landscape, but no QI for me. --Fischer.H 07:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lmbuga --Sandro Halank 13:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)