Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 17 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Alauda_arvensis_Ehedydd.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tynnais y llun ar Fynydd Hiraethog, Gogledd Cymru. By User:Alun Williams333 --Llywelyn2000 06:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not at all sharp. Charlesjsharp 22:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Certainly enough sharpness for QI. --A.Savin 22:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me and nice. -- Spurzem 21:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Oenanthe_oenanthe_Tinwen_y_Graig_ifanc.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Oenanthe oenanthe, Mynydd Hiraethog, North Wales. By User:Alun Williams333 --Llywelyn2000 06:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.Yes, some noise, but better ful details with some noise than blurred and noiseless. --Smial 09:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not very sharp and lighting unfortunate. Charlesjsharp 12:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not the best lighting but good for QI. -- Spurzem 21:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Kilometre definition.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Original definition of the [kilo]metre -- Martinvl 06:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose "Below minimum size requirement" per QIVoterHelper --Daniel Case 19:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is an svg, not a photo. You can download it as a 4 Mpix png, too. Please discuss. --C messier 12:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
  • {{s}} as C messier --Hubertl 05:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The original globe (File:Globe Atlantic.svg) is a vector graphic. This derived work however embeds the globe as a low res PNG (+ different fonts for "Paris" and "10000 km"). --Tsungam 11:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 12:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Birnbaum13.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pear tree in Baden-Württemberg, Germany --Megatherium 16:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The filename should contain the location or something else. It's not just a tree, it's a natural monument. And there are minor CAs at the branches. Otherwise QI. --XRay 19:21, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support I don't understand the point with the file name, the image description is complete, also categorization. The CA is absolutely invisible in 100% view. What I can see is some blurring noise reduction, I'd suggest somewhat more conservative settings, if possible. -- Smial 09:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Oppose "Birnbaum" means "pear tree", which is too generic, particularly as there are several species of pear tree. The name of the image should therefore be changed eg to "Birnbaum, Oberes Zipfelbachtal 13". Otherwise QI for me. Bahnfrend 08:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good. Perhaps the sort of pears should be named. But this is not important for me. -- Spurzem 10:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Taxa names are requested for QI --Moroder 17:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Steht doch da: Birnbaum. In der Kategorie Pyrus (Birne). -- Smial 10:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 12:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)