Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 16 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Ampelocissus_sp_1456.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ampelocissus sp --Vengolis 01:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --Seven Pandas 01:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose I'd like to see more information. Species, where the image was taken --Podzemnik 02:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
     Support - Good enough quality, IMO, and the species and location info is given. -- Ikan Kekek 18:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 21:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Manfred Kuzel 05:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Ganoderma_sp_1410.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ganoderma sp --Vengolis 01:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  OpposeInsufficient quality. Front edge of fungus, main subject is out of focus. --Seven Pandas 01:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
    I disagree. --Vengolis 02:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
     Support - Unless it's much bigger than it seems, the top fungus is quite sharp enough for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 18:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me.--Ermell 06:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Aitta_-_Seurasaari.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Storehouse, Seurasaari Open-Air Museum, Helsinki, Finland. --СССР 23:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    It looks overprocessed to be. Geo and better description would be good --Podzemnik 05:44, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
    ✓ Done: added coordinates and better description. The only post-processing applied to this image was to shadows and higlights - brightened and dimmed respectively. --СССР 04:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry but the quality is not there to me. It reminds quality of a smartphone photo --Podzemnik 05:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
     Support It's no smartphone, but a Panasonic LUMIX G DMC-GF2 and it's no excellent photo but QI for me. --Manfred Kuzel 14:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
     Support - The quality looks alright to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
     Comment The shadows disturb. -- Spurzem 14:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)