Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 15 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Lac de Montriond in commune of Montriond, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lac de Vonnes in Châtel, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the St Peter church in La Forclaz, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Stephen church in Vacheresse, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Le Biot, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 04:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westface of the Großer Hundstod, senn from the Seehorn --Milseburg 03:59, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Looking down on Pengcheng from the "Diwang Sightseeing" observation deck of Shenzhen Diwang Building. By User:DavyLithos --Q28 03:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Interesting view but insufficient quality. Lack of detail, noisy, I'm wondering about the chinese assessment. --Milseburg 04:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kyiv, Ukraine.English: St Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kiev, Ukraine.English: St Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kiev, Ukraine. By User:PetarM --Q28 03:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viewing platform of the Space Needle (south view), Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Part of the facade of the Museum of Pop Culture in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination KOMO building in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teil des Pacific Science Centers in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schild at Seattle Center in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charnel house in Metnitz, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scene from the Danse Macabre at the charnel house in Metnitz, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scene from the Danse Macabre at the charnel house in Metnitz, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scene from the Danse Macabre at the charnel house in Metnitz, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scene from the Danse Macabre at the charnel house in Metnitz, Metnitz, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A girl dancing at a Pongal Festival in Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India --Matthew T Rader 21:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Declined on June 2. Somewhat brighter, but still no personality rights template and IMO an insufficiently sharp face. If you'd like to challenge my decision, add a personality rights template and then change the status of the nomination to "Discuss". -- Ikan Kekek 22:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Luther church in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 18:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stemma di Tarragona--GattoCeliaco 16:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ici’bas Company in the show "ImproLocura" at 35. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 13:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capital in the cloister of St. Matthias Abbey, Trier, Germany, Moses with the ten commandments. --Palauenc05 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cylinder anemone (Cerianthus membranaceus), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sea anemone (Aiptasia couchii), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greater pipefish (Syngnathus acus), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 07:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --IamMM 10:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1941 Buick 8 --Ermell 07:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Support Agree and promoting --Poco a poco 07:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cadillac Series 62 --Ermell 07:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1978 Cadilliac Eldorado --Ermell 07:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1971 Chevrolet Camaro --Ermell 07:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East side of the old men's house at St. Nicolas Court in Bardowick (Lower Saxony)
--F. Riedelio 07:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination East side of the old men's house at St. Nicolas Court in Bardowick (Lower Saxony)
-
- Nomination Northeast side of the men's prebendary house no. 19 i/j at St. Nicolas Court in Bardowick (Lower Saxony)
--F. Riedelio 07:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination Northeast side of the men's prebendary house no. 19 i/j at St. Nicolas Court in Bardowick (Lower Saxony)
-
- Nomination Northeast side of the men's prebendary house no. 19 i/j at St. Nicolas Court in Bardowick (Lower Saxony)
--F. Riedelio 07:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination Northeast side of the men's prebendary house no. 19 i/j at St. Nicolas Court in Bardowick (Lower Saxony)
-
- Nomination Parish church St. Thomas am Blasenstein, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church St. Thomas am Blasenstein, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock formations Bucklwehluckn and wayside shrine, behind the parish church St. Thomas am Blasenstein, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East side of Clam Castle, municipality of Klam, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northeast side of Clam Castle, municipality of Klam, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 05:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve and FFH area 'Amerikafeld und Schindkaute bei Steinheim'--KaiBorgeest 22:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fig Tree leaves (Ficus carica) --Matthew T Rader 19:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Only a very small part of the image is in focus --Uoaei1 05:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC) - Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Fig Tree leaves (Ficus carica) --Matthew T Rader 19:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A home garden in Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India --Matthew T Rader 19:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination A home garden in Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India --Matthew T Rader 19:15, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Martin church in Nernier, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 19:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing puddling behavior of Iambrix salsala (Moore, (1866)) - Chestnut Bob. (by Sarpitabose) --Atudu 14:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Limousin bull, Lower Saxony. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Orange daylily (Hemerocallis fulva) in the shade --Ввласенко 19:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sucrerie Blouin --Wilfredor 14:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster, IAA 2017 --MB-one 20:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Review
The guy with the cropped head is so disturbing that it isn't a QI to me --Poco a poco 06:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abbey church of Saint-Antoine l'Abbaye, chapel #2, bottom of the east wall. On the left, Anthony the Great, crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John, on the right, the Archangel Michael. --Yann 19:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blick auf die Seen des Vogelschutzgebietes Garstadt bei Röthlein - Heidenfeld. Der Teil des Sees am rechten Rand gehört bereits zum Naturschutzgebiet "Erweiterung des Vogelschutzgebietes Garstadt". By User:Franky Frankson --Ezarate 17:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: Blurred, too low sharpness for QI and disturbing luminance noise . --F. Riedelio 06:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:35._Ulica_-_Afuma_-_Etsumon_-_20220709_1451_7860.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Afuma group in the show "Etsumon (Solidarity)" at 35. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 13:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose The background distracts too much --Jmh2o 18:04, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for review, I would like to check other opinions --Jakubhal 18:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC) - Oppose agree, also how many QIs do we need of the same event? --Kallerna 03:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Who do you mean by "we"? And where do you find in the guidelines something against nominating multiple pictures of one event? I am very careful to not nominate similar pictures. All of those nominated are unique. Using this logic we should never nominate pictures of famous monuments for example, because there may be hundreds of QI pictures of them already. But this is the QIC page, not the valued pictures candidates page. Not the one best picture is selected here. Every photo should be considered separately (unless it is almost a copy - not an issue here) --Jakubhal 05:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I strongly disagree with Kallerna opinion regarding events photography and QIC page, but the background of the photo in this particular case seems to be a real problem and there is no support. Thank you very much for the reviews. I withdraw --Jakubhal 09:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jakubhal: I fully agree with you. Only the disturbing background argument is admissible for not QI. --Jmh2o 20:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Bardowick St. Nikolai 009 2022 05 31.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Gravestone at the chapel St. Nicolas in Bardowick (Lower Saxony), view from the west
--F. Riedelio 06:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Nice but low quality, a bit blurry --Romainbehar 07:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
I disagree. --F. Riedelio 10:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC) - Oppose It's not bad, but the upper part is not sharp at any size, so I agree with Romainbehar. -- Ikan Kekek 07:33, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Support Somewhat oversaturated, but sharpness is good enpugh to be printed to A4 size. --Smial 09:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp (motion blurr?), overexposed. --Palauenc05 11:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Charleroi - rue de Charleville - immeuble moderniste (maison Dolpire) - 2022-06-29 - 03.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Charleroi - Maison Dolpire - modernist architecture building by Marcel Leborgne in 1946. --Jmh2o 08:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion IMO the cropped car at the right spoils the composition --Michielverbeek 06:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Bonsoir, j'ai téléversé une autre prise de vue, sans aucune voiture visible. J'ai soumis cette nouvelle image au vote. --Jmh2o 20:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Support The car in deep shade in a corner does not bother me in an urban scene. Good quality. --Tagooty 02:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC) - Support per Tagooty. --Smial 09:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support No problem with the car -- Spurzem 16:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Rursee 04.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Shore area at the Rursee, Germany --Llez 04:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree.Some frames are blurred. Overall sharpnes could be better regarding the image hight and the camera used. --Milseburg 09:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)- Comment Basically, I find the resolution and the basic sharpness completely acceptable, 2500 pixels image height is okay for a panorama, even if the camera used would offer more. But the two areas where apparently the stitching did not work well are unfortunately really disturbing, because you can see them even when you look at the photo reduced to screen height. If this can be fixed, I would definitely give it a "pro", because the colours and the light are good, and the slight fluctuations in brightness in the sky don't seem unnatural. --Smial 10:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Info Thaks for the reviews. I made a new stitch, omitting the unsharp frames. I think it is OK now. --Llez 20:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support That looks good. The colours seem even more natural to me. --Smial 23:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Better now. I've marked a little spot that you could improve. --Milseburg 13:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)