Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 10 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Close_wing_Basking_of_Libythea_lepita_(Moore,_1858)_-_Common_Beak_(2)_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing Basking of Libythea lepita (Moore, 1858) - Common Beak (2) WLB --Anitava Roy 16:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose undisclosed artificially replaced background --Charlesjsharp 12:56, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree, as seen at the bottom of the page, you can find another undisclosed background that was promoted, with 4 votes to 1. --多多123 13:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 15:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Hoogspanningsmast_EHVN-EHVO-150-9.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pylon EHVN-EHVO-150-9 of the 150kV power line Eindhoven-Noord - Eindhoven-Oost --Alex P. Kok 13:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 14:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Sharp enough. We should no overdo with our demands. -- Spurzem 16:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Overdo? we shouldn't lower them, specially with the technical development we experience year by year Poco a poco 11:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Poco, even with not professional cameras (APS-C or full farme), much better quality can be achieved to meet standards of today --PantheraLeo1359531 15:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  • I'm amazed again and again how high the demands are sometimes and what photographic waste is often praised. -- Spurzem 18:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness could be fine somehow, but very poor crop on the bottom.--CherryX 18:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 13:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Is a A4-size print our blueprint in 2023? Poco a poco 18:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Do you know the 6-Mpixels rule of thumb? --Smial 20:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 09:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Beeld Sint Rochus 2.png[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture of Saint Roch --ReneeWrites 05:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. I can't imagine the picture even roughly showing the correct colors of the statue and the wall. Please discuss whether it is a QI anyway. -- Spurzem 10:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
  • @Spurzem: Unedited photos can be seen here and here. I increased the brightness, but didn't change the colors themselves. Biggest change I made was removing the door in this one. ReneeWrites 19:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong description: it is not St. Lazarus but St. Roch --Moroder 18:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • @Moroder: Changed the file description and cats, and requested a file name change. ReneeWrites 18:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks, but unfortunately it's not sharp enough --Moroder 09:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose DoF problem, partially not sharp enough --LexKurochkin 10:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --LexKurochkin 10:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Paddy_fields_in_Butte_County-0086.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Paddy fields along Nelson Shippee Road in Butte County, California. In the background, the Sutter Buttes. --Frank Schulenburg 19:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Noisy, particularly in the top half, sorry --Mike Peel 17:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
    • Much better now, so I won't oppose, although the horizon would be much better if it was level. Thanks. Mike Peel 22:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Frank, I like your shot with the DJI drone. If you denoise the img, I'm ready to vote for you. --Terragio67 13:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Mike Peel, Terragio67: Denoised the photo and uploaded a new version; please take another look. Thanks, --Frank Schulenburg 23:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Terragio67 11:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Ermell 19:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 09:05, 9 July 2023 (UTC)