Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 08 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Stabilo_Boss_Original_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stabilo Boss Original Textmarker. --Ryse93 11:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It seems too unsharp for me. --IamMM 04:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fake-DOF didn't work well and appears therefore not realistic. The idea behind the photo is not bad, though. --Smial 06:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
@IamMM and Smial: Do you think this picture would be better? —Ryse93 (talk) 20:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
I prefer File:Stabilo Boss Original (5).jpg but I'm not sure if it meets the QI requirements. -- IamMM (talk) 05:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others --Palauenc05 07:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Child's_Faith_to_Santo_Niño.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The fluvial procession is an annual tradition that marks the start of the official Sinulog festival. Although it is a solemn event in sending Sto. Niño to visit his foster father, St. Joseph at the St. Joseph Parish in Mandaue City. This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 photographic contest. By User:Michol Sanchez --Tiven2240 07:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I really like the artistry of this photo, but I just don't think the child's face is sharp enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. This is not a studio portrait, so OK. --Yann 16:46, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 17:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Ikan is right regarding the focus. But the image is still sharp enough to be printed in A4 size. Lighting, composition, colours etc. are very good. --Smial 07:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Accept Ikan's point on focus but agree with Smial. --GRDN711 15:09, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support. Very impressive -- Spurzem 09:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 22:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Handorf_Bäckerstraße_10_Erdkeller_001_2022_05_31.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Entrance to the root cellar in Handorf (Lower Saxony), view from southwest --F. Riedelio 06:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose too noisy --Ezarate 19:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
  • New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 17:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition, disturbing fence in the foreground covering most of the motif. The southeast view (if the given geocoding is correct) of the other picture of the object is more favourable. --Palauenc05 07:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. No good composition with the fence in the foreground -- Spurzem 09:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Grey_Junglefowl_Male_Nagarhole_Apr22_D72_24112.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Grey junglefowl (m), Gallus sonneratii, Nagarhole Nat'l Park --Tagooty 00:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose head is not in focus --Charlesjsharp 21:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. Yann 18:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles.--Ermell 20:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)