Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 07 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Schleswig,_Waldmühle,_Riesenbärenklau_--_2023_--_1054.jpg[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --XRay 04:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tanguar_Haor_Houseboat.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tanguar Haor Houseboat --Wasiul Bahar 02:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 02:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Cropping out most of the distracting platform in the foreground will focus attention on the main subject. --Tagooty 02:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
    @Tagooty Done--Wasiul Bahar 08:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry in 100% view. --Светлана И. Ленина 13:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Not eligible to vote due to fewer edits. --Milseburg 12:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Stolperstein_Ludwigshafen_009_2023_06_22.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stumbling block dedicated to Eugen Zivi--F. Riedelio 09:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, let's discuss sharpness at 100 %. --Palauenc05 14:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Palauenc05 is right, but I think it's ok for QI --Sandro Halank 12:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Somewhat low DOF, but good enough for a decent A4 print. --Smial 11:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 14:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Bentanobad,_Frankfurt_(P1090583)_(cropped).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Aerial view of Brentanobad, Frankfurt, the largest outdoor swimming pool in Germany --MB-one 13:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 19:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted and IMHO lacks sharpness for QI --Poco a poco 20:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Moving to  Neutral, I will not oppose anymore the current version Poco a poco 07:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco. This one appears rather soft even in A4 size. --Smial 15:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
  • @Poco a poco and Smial: ✓ Done fixed the tilt and sharpness (IMO). Thanks for the review. --MB-one 18:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO sharp enough now. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 22:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_Nectering_of_Eurema_brigitta_(Stoll,_1780)_-_Small_Grass_Yellow_(4)_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing Nectering of Eurema brigitta (Stoll, 1780) - Small Grass Yellow (4) WLB --Anitava Roy 14:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose artificially processed background --Charlesjsharp 18:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality --Sandro Halank 12:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 14:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Open_wing_Basking_of_Neptis_jumbah_(Moore,_1858)_-_Chestnut-streaked_Sailer_(3)_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Open wing Basking of Neptis jumbah (Moore, 1858) - Chestnut-streaked Sailer (3) WLB --Anitava Roy 14:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose artificial background --Charlesjsharp 18:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 05:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support good quality --Sandro Halank 12:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 14:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)