Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 05 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Hutten-Czapski_Museum_17.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Leliwa COA at the Emeryk Hutten-Czapski Museum in Kraków --Scotch Mist 13:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Weird perspective. --Buidhe 13:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment These 'Coat of Arms' are above a doorway which is behind display cabinets so this is a 'natural perspective' and not what generally would be considered "weird". --Scotch Mist 14:00, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I doubt it's sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective is fine for my eye (though you'll find most reviewers here hate anything which doesn't have perfectly parallel verticals), but this image is far too soft/blurred, even when viewed full screen (as opposed to pixel-for-pixel). A faster exposure time, or a tripod would have been needed to capture this sharply. --Bobulous ( talk) 18:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per the others. Perspective is fine for me, but far from being sharp enough unfortunately. --Domob 05:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the additional views and concur that 'sharpness' less than ideal (not aided by 'physical limitations')! --Scotch Mist 10:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Naturschutzgebiet_Birgeler_Wald.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Naturschutzgebiet Birgeler Wald --Ssprmannheim 16:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment CA to be removed --Ermell 20:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose very strong CA; the blown areas in the sky aren't fixable. --Carschten 14:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
    •  Support I'm really suprised about the smooth light correction. QI for me now. --Carschten 13:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I reduced the CA. The highlights are blown out in a few places but it was also a cloudy day, --Ssprmannheim 14:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support There are some small traces of CAs left, but branches against the light are a very difficult situation (both regarding CAs and dynamic range), so the result is IMHO good now. --Aristeas (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 16:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Тургояк_Прибрежные_скалы_Челябнская_обл_4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Сoastal rocks of the lake of Turgoyak, Miassky urban district, Chelyabinsk region, Russia --Panasenko Marina 17:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support GQ --Palauenc05 13:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks too soft to me, please discuss --Podzemnik 05:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting creative view --Green100700 15:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too soft --Sandro Halank 15:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now - please fix the magenta chromatic aberration in the leaves, especially in the upper right. -- Ikan Kekek 21:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Лебедь.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. --Александр Байдуков 14:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Proper image description needed --MB-one 12:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 12:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Description is still not o.k. --Ermell 12:44, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose I changed the caption but i dont think the quality is good enough considering how many pictures and QIs of mute swans there are. --Ssprmannheim 12:33, July 2, 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC))