Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 03 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Baloon_cactus.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination notacactus magnificus-Balloon cactus. By --SKsiddhartthan 02:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, quality is good enough, but the categorization should be better. --XRay 05:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cropped too tightly, IMO.--Peulle 11:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As per Peulle. --Basotxerri 16:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bottom missing Poco a poco 20:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Daimler_V8_250_BW_2016-07-17_13-44-09.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Daimler V8 --Berthold Werner 10:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Pudelek 11:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The car is much too bright. Perhaps you can correct it. -- Spurzem 18:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Noch nicht ganz erledigt, dass Auto ist immer noch zu blass. Das müsste sich doch hinkriegen lassen. -- Spurzem 21:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Now good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 04:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Spurzem--Lmbuga 03:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 19:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)