Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 12 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Lumafabriken_January_2017.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stair in Lumafabriken (The Luma factory), a historic modernist lamp factory built in the 1930s as one of the first functionalist industrial plants. --ArildV 19:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark. Charlesjsharp 11:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I think the light level is OK. At this level, the view through the window looks accurate and the light that streams through the window onto the wall is not blown. There is a very fine grain in the darker parts of the photo, which I think is fine, especially at this file size. -- Ikan Kekek 13:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me too --A.Savin 17:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 18:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Поглед на Пуздерци.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Panoramic view of Puzderci, Macedonia --Kiril Simeonovski 19:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree. Much too soft. --A.Savin 18:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild  Support. I'm usually pretty demanding in what I consider an image of quality, but this looks good to me in a painterly way. -- Ikan Kekek 06:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I admit that this is a limit case, however I think it's not good enough. Besides, slight partial overexposure and need of perspective correction. --Basotxerri 15:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not bad for a mobile phone photo, but not quite good enough; there are problems with the rendition of boundaries as well as compression issues.--Peulle 21:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too soft. --Alchemist-hp 13:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Schamrock_Festival_2014_39.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Schamrock Festival der Dichterinnen Sainkho Namchylak --Kritzolina 20:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Some problems with strong noise reduction, camera at it's limits. But very good composition, and lighting. Perfect moment captured. --Smial 23:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I go along with promoting this, but on the condition that the apparently stray white spots, mostly but not exclusively to her right (the viewer's left) are removed. Please remove them, Kritzolina. -- Ikan Kekek 09:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
  • I remember Smial promoting my picture, and will chcke this. --Kritzolina 07:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC) .. Checked, I do remember correctly. --Kritzolina 07:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Thank you for re-checking, I will look for those white spots and try to fix the problem. --Kritzolina 14:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you. I'm delighted not to oppose this photo even temporarily. I'll just trust you to take care of the problem. -- Ikan Kekek 15:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Since I am not very good at image editing, I got help from Freddy2001 and I think he did perfect work - are you happy with it, too Ikan Kekek? --Kritzolina 20:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Not perfect, but it's much better, and good enough for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 18:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)