Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 10 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Changing of the Guard at Mausoleum of Atatürk, Ankara --Bgag 04:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Overall good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:43, 08 January 2015 (UTC
-
- Nomination Love padlocks on the sea mark, Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 08 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Jaungulbene manor alley. Kruusamägi 01:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gulbene railway station. Kruusamägi 01:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 08 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Willow tit, Poecile montanus, Lancashire, UK. --Baresi franco 00:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 08 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neunkirchen railwaystation. – Tramper "Unimat 09-32/4S Dynamic". --Steindy 00:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Fine details, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 08 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Porto Covo, Portugal Alvesgaspar 23:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 00:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Malarrif lighthouse, Vesturland, Iceland --Poco a poco 22:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Minibus station, Ankara --Bgag 20:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Nigella damascena --Ram-Man 17:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Highland Cattle on a Ranch of Harlesiel, Germany --Optimist4343 17:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Clearly below 2 megapixel not meeting QI criteria --Poco a poco 22:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Germany, Trier, Thebäerstraße 31 --Berthold Werner 12:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Outbuilding in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey 5 --Jacek Halicki 11:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Wikipedian on a wikiexpedition. Kruusamägi 10:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lielstraupe Castle. Kruusamägi 10:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 19:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ieriķi railway station. Kruusamägi 10:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 19:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Valmiera Castle ruins. Kruusamägi 10:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Murato (Corsica) - San Michele Church (12th century): Romanic window. --Dnalor 01 10:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination . By User:AlMare --FritsHG 10:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality, blurred, description of this file is missing. Therefore IMO not a QI. --Dnalor 01 11:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le Faou.- Finistère --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Too tightly cropped on the top. --Halavar 15:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Magnification of the frame on top.- Please take a look again.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Aston Martin V12 Vantage. Mattbuck 08:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Very distorted because of too short focal distance. Disturbing persons in the background. Sorry, not good for me. -- Spurzem 08:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Insufficient quality, too distorted. I agree with Spurzem, sorry! --Dnalor 01 09:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Statue of Aphrodite in Baths of Diocletian --Livioandronico2013 08:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Mercury in Baths of Diocletian --Livioandronico2013 08:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Meadow Salsify (Tragopogon pratensis), found near Mitterbach am Erlaufsee, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 07:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Great Geysir, Geysir Geothermal Field, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Geysir, Geysir Geothermal Field, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heimaey stave church, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Joydeep 08:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elliðaey island, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Islet next to Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination District Tawau, Sabah: Timber truck with piggyback trailer at the logging Camp of Asiatic Lumber Industries. --Cccefalon 06:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination District Tawau, Sabah: Timber log ready for shipment. --Cccefalon 06:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saxifraga cespitosa (Tufted Alpine Saxifrage) --Wsiegmund 05:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination De Weerribben-Wieden National Park Path between birches and a dangerous swamp.
Famberhorst 05:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Purple CAs top left and right, Category:Swamps by country should only contain other categories. --Christian Ferrer 06:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Remove CA.--Famberhorst 07:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC) QI for me. --Dnalor 01 09:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination De Weerribben-Wieden National Park Path between birches and a dangerous swamp.
-
- Nomination De Weerribben-Wieden National Park. Mirroring in waterway.
Famberhorst 05:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Natural colour rendition, beautiful water reflection, lordly quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination De Weerribben-Wieden National Park. Mirroring in waterway.
-
- Nomination Sunset on the Lake Woerth and sailing yacht, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 05:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset on the Lake Woerth, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination OEBB 4024-City Shuttle on the Drautalbahn II, Poertschach on the Lake Woerth, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. --Dnalor 01 09:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Plaque of Carl Benz, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --XRay 04:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose out of focus --Christian Ferrer 06:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination OEBB-Railjet on the Drautalbahn II, Poertschach on the Lake Woerth, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion An unusual perspective, but well done and sharp. --Steindy 22:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neunkirchen railwaystation – Ballast-management system „BDS 2000-4“ (part 2). --Steindy 00:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 16:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bolungarvík lighthouse, Vestfirðir, Iceland. --Poco a poco 21:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality ok, good composition. --ArildV 09:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Ox head in Baths of Diocletian --Livioandronico2013 08:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ox head in Baths of Diocletian (Rome) --Livioandronico2013 08:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yunnan, China: last bridge over Jinsha River before Tiger Leaping Gorge (虎跳峡, Hǔtiào Xiá). --Cccefalon 06:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice, but please fix the upper left corner.--ArildV 09:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Thank you, ArildV, I fixed the untilting leftover. --Cccefalon 22:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC) Support --ArildV 09:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Painted door with a Benedictine monk and cat --Livioandronico2013 12:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Blueish. --Yann 13:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Done --Livioandronico2013 20:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose Disturbing colorisation and disturbing shadow. --Steindy 23:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gargoyle at the Cathedrale, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Tilted Poco a poco 09:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Fixed Sorry, you're right. It's fixed now.--XRay 12:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Gargoyle at the Cathedrale, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mannequin dressed as princess of the fairy tale "The Frog Prince“, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 05 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion That the picture was taken by the shop window, it's amazing sharp and without annoying reflections. --Steindy 23:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination le courant à Mimizan dans les Landes (département) Aquitaine--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Blown sky, can't be fixed, I'm afraid. --Óðinn 18:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Now I think so too--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Finalspiel der Football-EM 2014 zwischen Österreich und Deutschland.by AleXXw --Hubertl 10:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:55, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Happy New Year 2015 to all commons user! --Steindy 00:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Thanks, and the best for you and your family too! --Hubertl 00:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:56, 07 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bifröst University, Grábrók, Vesturland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Bit red isn't it? Mattbuck 21:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC) New version Poco a poco 22:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Bifröst University, Grábrók, Vesturland, Iceland --Poco a poco 08:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kota Kinabalu (Sabah): Old Japanese Cemetary) --Cccefalon 06:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment Please fix the tilt, although it may not be a QI anyway with the overexposure (good for me though). Ram-Man 23:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Done Thank you, Ram-Man, I made some correction though there are a lot of competing "verticals" on this old cemetery. --Cccefalon 19:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Quite a bit of CA at the top. Mattbuck 21:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Thank you, Mattbuck, it turned out to be a complicated fringe colour, so I finally decided to apply a tighter crop additionally. --Cccefalon 20:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion OK. Mattbuck 21:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Kota Kinabalu (Sabah): Old Japanese Cemetary) --Cccefalon 06:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Yellow Tagetes erecta flowers. --Joydeep 07:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Is there any chance of a different crop at the bottom? Mattbuck 17:50, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
I can crop off the bottom flower but can't get the whole flower. --Joydeep 17:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Cropped. --Joydeep 16:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC) - Promotion That's better, though it feels a bit tilted anticlockwise. --Mattbuck 21:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Yellow Tagetes erecta flowers. --Joydeep 07:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
_--_2014_--_3558.jpg)
_Plants.JPG)
.jpg)
_Closeup.jpg)
_Buds.jpg)
_High_DoF.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Ponte_Sisto_--_2013_--_4094.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Micheldorf Lorenzenberg 68 Filialkirche hl Laurentius Apsis-Stuetzmauer Bogenportal 07082014 109.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Arch portal in the wall supporting the apse of the subsidiary church Saint Lawrence at Lorenzenberg, Micheldorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 06 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 05:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I cleared it up, new version uploaded --Hubertl 08:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment As a co-author, you should abstain from voting IMHO --Kreuzschnabel 08:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 07:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 08:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI for me, I don't see a problem with the tiny bright parts --DKrieger 22:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 09:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --C messier 14:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Promoted --C messier 14:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)File:Nemi_view.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Nemi view --Livioandronico2013 20:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 20:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Comment I do not know Hubertl. For me the vignetting is too visible. It is necessary to correct. Livioandronico2013 there is too much sky and you have only to cut the photo on the line. --Steindy 21:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Done --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Now it's okay. Good quality. --Steindy 22:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:53, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Promoted --C messier 14:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)File:Graffiti_-_Nordring_-_Walldorf_-_Mörfelden-Walldorf_-_02.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Graffiti, Mörfelden-Walldorf. --NorbertNagel 16:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment Right side leaning out. Mattbuck 15:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective corrected. --NorbertNagel 14:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- OpposeWrong white balance IMO.--Jebulon 17:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. The grass is green, the sky is blue, no problem with white balance. --Smial 13:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer 18:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --C messier 15:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Palazzo_della_Civiltà_Italiana_2015.jpg[edit]
File:Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana 2015.jpg
- Nomination Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana --Livioandronico2013 13:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Comment this building is in real almost white! --Hubertl 14:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
maybe if there was the sun, but not on a cloudy day!--Livioandronico2013 17:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Comment Why do you argue, just repair it within a minute in PS using the RAW-filter. I can see the difference here on the monitor. But it´s just the JPG and there are severe artefacts too! --Hubertl 19:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Sorry! When I compare these photos with those on the italian page, then here are in between worlds. --Steindy 23:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
But as it gets to compare a photo in full sun and one of a cloudy day, other please --Livioandronico2013 08:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC) - Comment Please announce, when uploaded a corrected version. This discussion is about the criticised version, not the actual one! (please check, if you can clear the FOP-problem too!)--Hubertl 10:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Declined --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Declined --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)File:Dioscuri_of_Palazzo_della_Civiltà_Italiana_2.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Dioscuri of Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana --Livioandronico2013 13:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry! When I compare these photos with those on the italian page, then here are in between worlds. --Steindy 23:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
But as it gets to compare a photo in full sun and one of a cloudy day, other please --Livioandronico2013 08:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC) - Comment even this is not the discussed version, please announce any new upload during the assessment!--Hubertl 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Livioandronico2013 20:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Declined --Livioandronico2013 20:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)File:Butterfly_Cabbage_White_-_Pieris_brassicae_02.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Large White (Pieris_brassicae). Adana, TR --Zeynel Cebeci 18:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Question I think the right wing is overexposed. Can you repair it? --Steindy 19:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC) - Decline Support Good quality. I examined each channel. Clipping (value equal to 255) is present on a small region near the trailing edge of the right forewing, but I judge that to be minor. Information is irretrievably lost when clipping occurs. It is not repairable. The eye and thorax hairs are not in sharp focus but wing scales are visible on both wings. Also, the composition is pleasing to me and the background is complementary. Lighting, exposure (except as above) and pose are good. Overall, I think it is not as good as QI File:ComputerHotline - Pieris brassicae (by).jpg, but comparable, and among the very best images of a well-photographed species.--Wsiegmund 16:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC) Oppose I don't agree. Here is the DOF the problem. F4 is not a good choice for a picture like this IMO. --Hockei 12:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment What choices does he have in this situation? Raising ISO, Focus stacking, decrease shutter speed? If someone is not specialized for this pictures, but you are, Hockei, give him some constructive advices related to his equipment. So ist das nur ein blöd Sterben lassen! Du weißt was mit dem Bild passiert, wenn er f/13 verwendet. Er aber vielleicht nicht.--Hubertl 10:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment He's active here and uploads pictures since 2006 so no novice in photography. He won't die stupid. ;-) But if he has any question about my opinion then he can ask me. --Hockei 16:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Not done since 10 days. --Steindy 23:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Steindy 23:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Declined --Steindy 23:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)File:Noctilucent Clouds.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Noctilucent clouds in Estonia (by Ireena). Kruusamägi 12:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Comment There is some posterization and colour noise. Perhaps due to too high color saturation or too much post processing. A full format DSLR should not have so much noise with only ISO400, but I do not know if this is common for this camera model. -- Smial 13:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support The photo is certainly very noisy. I suspect that the high ISO is necessary. In any case impresses me the photo with its composition and its colors. For me therefore QI. --Steindy 14:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. Obvisiously too noisy. More votes? --Smial 11:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive image despite the noise (for sure this charming picture it's absolutly not too noisy!)! Good quality for me. --Dnalor 01 08:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment For a night time shot, I see extraordinarily little noise. Horizon is tilted CCW though, please fix this. Will support then. --Kreuzschnabel 09:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Avoidable noise and heavy posterization (see sky) is no more a reason to decline? Ok, lesson learned. -- Smial 13:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI now for me. @Smial: can you pls add a note where there is posterization? I don’t see any but a very tiny little area in the central bright streak, far from "heavy". --Kreuzschnabel 08:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- After Hubertl's rework the posterization and noise are supressed, now the image is rather soft. I judged a different image. Vote deleted. -- Smial 08:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Too noisy, posterized. Alvesgaspar 16:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support I uploaded a denoised version (color and luminance) - even when I made it with 100%, means lowest compression, the filesize is just half of the original jpg. Despite of the situation, it was 1:30 a.m. its QI for me. The posterization is not so heavy in my opinion. --Hubertl 20:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support tilt corrected, I don't see any posterization. --Iifar 07:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --C messier 14:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Promoted --C messier 14:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)File:Pajunahkis III.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Cytidia salicina (by Ireena). Kruusamägi 20:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment The DoF is very shallow and it makes the composition very awkward. I'd oppose because this could have been shot at f/13 instead of f/9, but I'm not sure since the primary subject is well shown. Need another opinion. Ram-Man 03:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, some of the unfocused parts are really disturbing. Alvesgaspar 18:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Somewhat low DOF, so not perfect, but overall acceptable as QI. -- Smial 21:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. Yann 01:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately DOF as others. --Hockei 11:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support good enough for me. --Iifar 07:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Steindy 18:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Holleday 19:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 09 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --C messier 13:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Promoted --C messier 13:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)File:Complexe de Srah Srang.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Temple de Banteay_Kdei site d'Angkor, au Cambodge --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
- Review Oppose Below minimum size requirement. --C messier 13:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, here posted the original photo--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
@ PIERRE, @ C messier: During you discussed I have upload a new version (brightness, contrast, sharpness, detail a little bit modified). --Steindy 11:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC) I think too much contrast was added. IMHO, some areas now seem overexposed (eg. the walls visible through the windows to the right). I change to Discuss. --C messier 11:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Happy new Year 2015--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:30, 31 December 2014 (UTC) - Support --Steindy 12:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Too harsh lighting and shadows. The dog doesn't add to the composition. Alvesgaspar 18:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment EXIF data? Yann 01:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment- @Yann Sorry, EXIF datas disappeared between different versions * Done Métadonnées are: Date de prise de vue:01/29/14, 3:21 AM UTC, Dimensions 4912 x 3264, Nom de fichier:Complexe de Srah Srang.jpg, Taille du fichier:6.47M, Appareil photo:NEX-F3, Objectif -Longueur focale:26 mm, Exposition:1/250, Nombre F:f/8, ISO:200, Marque de l'appareil photo SONY, Flash:Non utilisé --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --C messier 10:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --C messier 10:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)