Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 07 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Austria_national_under-21_football_team_-_Teamcamp_November_2015_(076).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Footballimpression. --Steindy 00:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry! The ball is not sharp enough. --Sandro Halank 15:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Question @Sandro Halank: Are you sure about a focal length of 480 mm and an aperture of 2.8? --Steindy 22:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
    I disagree. Let's hear other votes plleae. --Steindy 00:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Sandro Halank. There is excellent sharpness - on some of the leaves, but unfortunately not on the ball. --Smial 10:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 14:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Fukushima_20200810_181323.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination JR East E3-2000 series shinkansen at Fukushim Station. By User:Ka23 13 --Augustgeyler 12:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose A understand the limitations of the locations, but I find the out of focus railings distracting. --C messier 20:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see your point. But as this environment is part of the subject I'd like to ask for more reviews. --Augustgeyler 23:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Disturbing objects in the foreground. --F. Riedelio 10:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others --Jakubhal 11:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support "shinkansen at station" - imho good enough. --Smial 21:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The barriers are irritating. Unfortunately, they cannot be removed by magic. --Steindy 22:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per C messier. --A.Savin 14:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per C messier.--Peulle 08:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 14:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)