Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 06 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:White-breasted_Woodswallow_(Artamus_leucorynchus)_at_Gili_Trawangan,_NTB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination White-breasted Woodswallow (Artamus leucorynchus) at Gili Trawangan, NTB --Eka343 16:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Damayantidwi 07:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I know that this is a difficult shot, but the birds are very blurry even though they are only a very small part of the photograph. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing except the right bird's beak is in focus. --Plozessor 05:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Mike Peel 19:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Open_Wing_Basking_of_Symphaedra_nais_(Forster,_1771)_-_Baronet_WLB_DSC_2785.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Open Wing Basking of Symphaedra nais (Forster, 1771) - Baronet .No subspecies are listed under this species in India.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly. --TAPAN1412 15:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient detail IMO, rather heavy noise because of very high ISO. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If we apply the same standards as we do to other nominations then this is clearly below the bar. --Plozessor 07:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)