Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 22 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:1KG_weight_India.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 1KG weight for measurment India --Suyash.dwivedi 19:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too unsharp for a studio shot Ezarate 21:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Yann 16:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Could be a close case, but I tend to agree with Ezarate. Let's see what others think when it goes to CR. -- Ikan Kekek 00:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Given that the resolution is not particularly high, I'd say no, per the others.--Peulle 14:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 02:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Tyrnauer_Alm_Rote_Wand.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Rote Wand from the NE, Styria --Clemens Stockner 21:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Contrast too strong. There is no information in the dark parts --Moroder 17:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 16:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree --Moroder 17:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - There's a tiny dust spot just to the left of the upper reaches of the tree on the right side, but as for the contrast, I find it acceptable and like the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 00:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 02:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Haus-Westfassade_mit_Vorgarten_und_Gehweg,_2017,_Faberstr._8D,_München.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Modern residental house in Munich --Lucasbosch 10:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, the right wall appears distorted, the left part of the building is not vertical, and the crop is a little bit too tight in the top. --Bob Collowân 12:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
@Bob Collowân: You're right, the perspective has to be corrected but it's a good practice to include the perspective correction as a task in the review instead of decline the image as we're talking about a fixable error. --Basotxerri 15:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
@Lucasbosch: Please correct the perspective. --Basotxerri 15:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
@Bob Collowân and Basotxerri: : ✓ Done Lucasbosch 18:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I still think the upper frame is a little bit too close, however, as the perspective has now been corrected, I support it. --Bob Collowân 18:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Basotxerri 21:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  • I  Support, too. Bob Collowân, since you support now, would you be willing to change "Discuss" to "Promotion", or do you still think we should have a discussion at Consensual Review, when it appears like there's just about no possibility of this photo being declined? -- Ikan Kekek 23:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Hi Ikan Kekek, perhaps it's my fault as I put it into CR. When I saw that Bob had already given his support, maybe I should have reversed it to Promotion. --Basotxerri 09:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

File:HotelSasso-MardelPlata.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Front view of Hotel Sasso, Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment There are some dust spots in the sky to remove. --Milseburg 13:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done if you see more, please sign it on the picture, thanks!! --Ezarate 21:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Not done There are more then 10 spots remaining, some with ghost lines. I marked some of them. I´m sure you find the rest on your own. They are quite obvious. --Milseburg 12:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I don´t see anymore dust spots Ezarate 18:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Not done Sorry, but I do. I suggest I decline and you sent it into CR to get another opinion. --Milseburg 12:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  • OK I can't find anymore dust spots Ezarate 14:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Really? There are big dust spots and some small ones all over the photo. Not a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 11:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I see the dust spots.--Peulle 15:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have removed more than 40 Dustspots and the gray fog in this Version. --Ralf Roletschek 16:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 02:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Virgen de las Cuarenta Horas, Limache, 2016-02-29.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Statue of Our Lady of Cuarenta Horas, Limache, Chile --Carlos yo 16:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, the statue is too unsharp for a QI. --Basotxerri 17:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support for me. I think it is sharp enough for QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 21:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality ! Vanoot59 17:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp.--Peulle 18:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose At 6 Mpix is reasonably sharp, but not all together. --C messier 12:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I'd at least like her head to be a bit sharper. -- Ikan Kekek 00:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 02:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)