Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 21 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2017-02-03_Ekaterina_Katnikova_by_Sandro_Halank–1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ekaterina Katnikova beim HELABA Nationscup der Damen in Oberhof 2017 --Sandro Halank 20:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too tight top crop, IMO, cutting off part of the helmet. --Peulle 22:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. The helmet is not important. --Ermell 20:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ermell. --Basotxerri 16:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. -- Spurzem 21:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Top crop Poco a poco 21:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Good picture, but I think that is not QI (I'm not sure): Exposure time: 1/800 sec (why?), F-number (f/2.8)--Lmbuga 12:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition could be better. DoF could be better IMO--Lmbuga 12:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Too tight, Vanoot59 17:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-02-04_Ralf_Palik_by_Sandro_Halank–1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ralf Palik beim Rennrodel-Weltcup der Herren in Oberhof 2017 --Sandro Halank 20:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality: unsharp in places, unfortunate top crop. --Peulle 22:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Eyes are sharp and the face is in the middle. With an aperture of 2.8 you you cannot get more. --Ermell 20:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
The whole face should be sharp, IMO. Here the nose for instance is unsharp.--Peulle 14:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This time per Peulle. The nose IMO is too unsharp for a portrait. --Basotxerri 16:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Weak Pro. Sharpness could be better but Halank obviously wanted to get an unsharp background and therefore he decided for 2.8. -- Spurzem 16:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Top crop Poco a poco 21:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor DoF (f/2.8 and, incomprehensibly for this kind of photo, 1/500 sec (0.002))--Lmbuga 12:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - A little blur in the bottom, Vanoot59 17:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jebulon 22:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 23:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)