Nomination San Francisco at Sunset --Digon3 21:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline unsharp, poor contrast --Mfield 17:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Magdalena "Medeah" Stupkiewicz from polish rock band Artrosis. --Lestat 19:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Very clear and close portrait, but monochrome (!) and too dark. a l τ o n .ıl 00:06, 6 March 2007
Nomination Anna Danyluk from Sierra Manta band. --Lestat 11:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Good portrait. I like the body posture and the face expression. There are minor flaws (overexposed and underexposed parts, noise in left arm) but they can be ignore IMO. Alvesgaspar 14:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Modern wind energy plant in rural scenery. --norro 18:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion superb! perfect rxposure, nice colours, beautiful shadows on the wings, centered solitaire composition, shows what it's intended to do. FP after noise reduction? --Ikiwaner 22:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC) I would support.It's a beautiful image. norro 08:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Chełm. --Lestat 01:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion impressing view, good exposure and stitching. Image uploaded much bigger than useful. --Ikiwaner 22:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Superjednostka. --Lestat 01:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline The subject is not the focus of this picture, and the statue on the left detracts from its balance. a l τ o n.ıl 08:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Hidden Caiman crocodilus --Leyo 14:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Nice and illustrative photo. Good quality - Alvesgaspar 14:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Soderskar island and lighthouse, Finnland --A.J. 09:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Awesome Image, its a pity that the resolution is too small --Simonizer 10:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Galeries Lafayette --Wouterhagens 08:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline I am not very firm in that, but what about the copyright? Galeries Lafayette isn´t a puplic place, is it? --Simonizer 09:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC). Public or private, the copyright issue (Freedom of panorama) applies for buildings older than 70 years in France. But major stiching mistakes on the left so DeclineDiligent
Nomination many elephants in water --Wouterhagens 08:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Great picture, but there are some strange stains in the upper right. Can you correct that? --Simonizer 09:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Vaux le vicomte castle, Maincy, France --startaq 04:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Resolution too small --Simonizer 08:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Goalkeeper --Leyo 19:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Poor photographic quality: too much noise - Alvesgaspar 14:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationColisa lalia --Pharaoh Hound 13:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Clear subject, good quality. Very useful. norro 19:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationPlegadis falcinellus --Pharaoh Hound 13:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. I don't like the flash much and the blown out parts, but this is QIC, not FPC.--Arad 21:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Morchella conica A.J. 12:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Overexposed parts. --Lestat 18:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Control surfaces of an airfoil. norro 23:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very usefull schema, good description, and SVG. --Lestat 19:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Buddhist monk begging at Oigawa, Arashiyama, Kyoto, Japan--Arad 18:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Meets QI guidelines as far as I can see. --Leyo 10:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination trains entering Marcy Avenue station, NYC,nominated by User:Dschwen --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Chaotic composition, dark element in high-left corner disturbing me. --Lestat 14:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC), It's a station platform, with its roof. How could I improve the composition? --Dschwen 09:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination nominated by User:Dschwen rush hour on the 7 train --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion The distortion is a bit disturbing, but apart from that very nice. --norro 23:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A train rolling stock, nominated by User:Dschwen --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion everything allright--Simonizer 11:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination San Francisco street scene, nominated by User:Dschwen --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Meets QI guidelines as far as I can see. --Leyo 16:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination North Beach, SF. nominated by User:Dschwen --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. norro 23:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination China town, SF, nominated by User:Dschwen --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Meets QI guidelines as far as I can see. --Leyo 16:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination osmotic preasure --LadyofHats 10:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Handsome and useful image. Lycaon 15:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Turgor preasure on plant cells --LadyofHats 14:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (UTC)
Promotion Why disturbing and not really needed for any purpose background? --WarX 23:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)-- the background is there to make the image similar to the last one, to help making the image not seeing so empty and to reduce the high contrast against the background -LadyofHats 14:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC) QI for me albeit non-favorable background. --Leyo 10:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Good effort, and effective at managing perspective. I'd learn from Featured panoramas, though. Alton, 00:18, 6 March 2007
Nomination Anja Orthodox. --Lestat 15:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline too dark, character not centered, too much space on top, in general bad composition-LadyofHats 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Microphone. --Lestat 15:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Unsharp, poor lighting for encyclopedia use -Mfield 00:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Pelican statue on the roof of well in castle in Malbork - Cropped version. --Lestat 15:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Blury and overexposed, with jpg aberrations. -LadyofHats 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Macro shot of an oyster. --norro 13:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion i feel it rather overexposed, maybe next time chose a no white background?- LadyofHats 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationCymbidium orchid --norro 13:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion is it the back of the flower out of focus or is another flower?-LadyofHats 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC) For me it's OK. It can be QI. --Lestat 18:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Thai Ridgeback Dog --Pharaoh Hound 12:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion next time try that it doesnt apear the leg on the back. it anoys the composition a bit.-LadyofHats 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationPavo cristatus --Pharaoh Hound 12:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion it is a bit blury , but i think not so much not to be QI-LadyofHats 07:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Not enough detail (only 72 dpi), and photo overall washed out. --Steevven1 03:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Burg Hohenzollern, Germany --norro 09:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Even though some parts of the roofs are a little overexposed, this is a really fine image --Simonizer 09:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Cape Farewell, NZ - cliffs with arch --Mfield 19:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC) New version without crop top left --Mfield 21:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Nice pic, but it's a pity that in the upper left corner a part is cropped. --Leyo 08:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Now it can be. Good perspective. --Lestat 18:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Sydney Harbour Bridge. Except it's not a "night pic". Haha. oh wait. it is. --Wj32 08:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Too much perpective distortion, easily fixed -Mfield 17:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination sorry about the number of similar photos... --Wj32 08:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Little blurry and I don't like this composition with bridge. --Lestat 18:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A composite of three Willie Wagtails perching together --Benjamint444 06:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Part of subject unfocused, tails cropped, distracting and ugly backgroung (including what seems to be stitching stains) - Alvesgaspar 19:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination An Australian Willie Wagtail --Benjamint444 04:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Tail is cut. --Leyo 14:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Panorama of Las Vegas strip at night Mfield 00:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Great Panorama, very detalied. QI. --Lestat 11:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination another dino --LadyofHats 18:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC))
Promotion another QI --norro 12:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Stone face on the building in Bytom. --Lestat 15:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Baal Ravenlock from polish metal band Hell-Born. --Lestat 15:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice, good quality. --norro 12:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationPavo cristatus --Pharaoh Hound 12:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion I like this depth of field. QI. Lestat 15:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Pholiota squarrosa. --Lestat 20:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Resolution is sufficient, subject is in focus. I like and promote it. norro 13:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Hospital of Holy Spirit in Frombork (Poland). --Lestat 20:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline the image is blury, the composition rather dull, and it has jpg aberrations (to see what i mean see the pink and blue colors that form on the cross) -LadyofHats 22:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Monument of victim of Katyn massacre. --Lestat 20:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion I don't like the composition, but quality is good. norro 14:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Young mixed-breed dog --Pharaoh Hound 19:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Well focused, centered, nice colours. I like it. -- Ayacop 17:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Bryce Canyon Hoodoos --Digon3 15:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Nice. Quality is sufficient. norro 14:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Most famous monument in Warsaw --A.J. 12:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline I don't like this cropping. --Lestat 12:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A busy newspaper vendor, captured at the last day of the 3rd Central Star Ferry Pier which had been closed now in Hong Kong.Stewart~惡龍 05:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination An Australian Pelican --Benjamint444 05:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Certainly seems to meet the technical standards. The cropping is a bit tight for my liking. --Pharaoh Hound 13:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Montreal City Hall, sure it's a featured images but not all FP are QI. This one should be.--Gmaxwell 14:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion I concur- beautiful!--Trounce 12:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination MG Road, Bangalore, with the public utility building in the background. --Kprateek88 15:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline it misses contrast, but what anoys me the must is the composition. if your central object is the street then you should give it a bit more weight, as it is now the eye floats between the building, the trees and the stones on the front. the image could also be a bit sharp, yet on screen size this problem disapears —the preceding unsigned comment is byLadyofHats (talk • contribs)
Nomination Largest dimension doesn't exceed 1600px but as it's quadratic ... --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Well focused, centered, good light, motive behaving nicely. -- Ayacop 17:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Image of Petronas Towers at night, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. --Jnpet 05:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Entire photograph is wiggly. And noisy. norro 10:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationProcyon lotor --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion personally i miss the tail, but one cant have everything-LadyofHats 09:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination I love this idyllic scenery. --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion nice mood, well composed with the bird on top --Ikiwaner 18:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC) For me a FP candidate -- Simonizer 13:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC) It already has been, Simonizer. norro 10:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Tourist-telescope on Mount Diablo, Bay Area, USA (dark blotches are dragonflies, lots of them) --Dschwen 18:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline the picture is sharp. but mises real contrast, there is much of the image that is out of focus, i would have gone for a version with less background. the problem with this image is maily of composition -LadyofHats 09:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC), Fair enough, but I think you are overly strict with the composition argument. This is not FPC after all. And I was aiming to show distant wide open spaces. --Dschwen 13:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Bondhusbreen - ice & rock --Kirq 11:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline bad light together with bad composition, the image is from a great subject, but could do with a bit more of quality-LadyofHats 09:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination View from Gr. Feldberg/ Taunus Mount./ Germany --Falense 20:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion i supose the blury effect comes from the weather. it is an impresive view.-LadyofHats 09:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC))
Nomination Medieval handicraft presented on celtic festival in Będzin. --Lestat 16:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Cut subjject and bad lighting. norro 16:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Medieval handicraft presented on celtic festival in Będzin. Ver. 2 - more light. In fact subject isn't cut - this is main part of subject. --Lestat 20:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion not the must interesting subject but i think it is ok now-LadyofHats 09:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Very dynamic. --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Too blurry and grainy. --Pharaoh Hound 13:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)- Yeah dynamic! The boarder and the camera as well. There are two possibilties to make dynamic photos. The first one is move the camera with the subject. Then the boarder would be in focus and the enviroment is blurry. The second way is to let the camera static, and subject is moving through the picture. Then the enviroment is in focus and the boarder is blurry. But at this picture both things are blurry. Additional there is heavy noise -- Simonizer 13:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Gargoyle on the cathedral roof in Frombork. --Lestat 20:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Decline i dont lie saying i thougt long about this one. in fact the picture isnt bad. but the jpg compresion has given a very anoying pink shadow to the bricks,and some edges of the gargole are overexposed :P. this was so close...-LadyofHats 14:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Dawn over field with hay bales --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline unsharp in the left and the right --Ikiwaner 18:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination I love this picture for its expression. --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Far too small, blurry. --Pharaoh Hound 18:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC) agree with decline but it's quite good. Panning is well done and head is sharp. Just the motion blurred body is too much. --Ikiwaner 19:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination European Larch (Larix decidua) - cones. Przykuta 09:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Depth of field problems: the tips of the cones are very distractingly out of focus. --Pharaoh Hound 13:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Leaf of Birch (betula pendula). Przykuta 09:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Similar problems to the larch cones. Even the few parts that are in focus appear to be a bit blurry. --13:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC) —the preceding unsigned comment is byPharaoh Hound (talk • contribs)
Nomination Mullein (Verbascum densiflorum) in winter Przykuta 09:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline I like this picture, but a large part of the subject is out of focus. norro 16:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Rudbeckia laciniata - a flower Przykuta 09:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline DOF issues. Only a very small part of the flower is actually in focus. --Pharaoh Hound 13:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Good quality and illustrative. Rust on a fence. norro 21:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion shallow dof but sharp rust, Illustration of "Lochfrass" --Ikiwaner 18:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination High quality shot of one of the most common DSLRs. --norro 21:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline reflections on the display don't look composed, disturbing background. --Ikiwaner 18:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Köhlbrand bridge, Port of Hamburg --Dschwen 18:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline not so illustrative bevause of pov, chrominance noise on the street and crash barriers --Ikiwaner 18:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Chemistry Department, University of Göttingen, Germany --Dschwen 18:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion no noise :-) carefully chosen point of view and projection method --Ikiwaner 18:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Unsharp, hand and teeth are moving. Lestat 14:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Morion blur emphasizes this politicitians talking and argumenting. --Ikiwaner 19:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Uetliberg TV tower --Ikiwaner 21:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Nice composition, good quality. Lestat 14:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationLoligo vulgaris, a common squid from the North Sea -- Lycaon 13:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent detail and quality - Alvesgaspar 13:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationIguana delicatissima, a rare Caribean iguana from Dominica, W.I. -- Lycaon 13:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Doesn't seem delicate at all to me !... Aprove photo quality but don't like the shadow at right and the rock at left. I would try a crop - Alvesgaspar 13:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Anguillara (Italy) --AngMoKio 20:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion sharp, illustrative --Ikiwaner 21:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination bee on flower --AngMoKio 20:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion very nice and meets technical requirements norro 17:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination London Plane. --Lestat 17:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very clear. Would like to see the background to be out of focus though. norro 17:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination FESA fire fighting helicopter operating during bushfires on 4th Feb. Gnangarra 12:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion A smoky feeling. Good. --Thermos 18:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Sunset Norway. My first QI nom. Feel free to slap me if the picture is not special/hiquality enough -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Beatiful sky but poor image quality in full resolution (might improve with downsampling and/or noise removal). Like it is, composition is also a bit booring, misses some "central" subject. I would try a crop. Try again... Alvesgaspar 22:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination High quality macro shot of a hoverfly --norro 16:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion indeed very good quality, illustrative --Ikiwaner 21:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Clear photograph of Hypolimnas bolina --norro 16:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Nice picture, unusual composition, no obvious flaws. Alvesgaspar 22:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Monument in Gdańsk. --Lestat 10:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Anatomy of a polychaete --Lycaon 22:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Nice, nice,nice. I support it, but prepare numbered version too ;) --WarX 10:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Illustration of geological structures associated with a receding glacier --Lycaon 22:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion aren't glaciers receding rather in U-shape than parallel? --Ikiwaner 19:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Illustration is very good for what it wants to illustrate. --Ikiwaner 21:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination driving racing car (panning picture) --AngMoKio 17:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion illustrative, good composition, dynamic. --Ikiwaner 19:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Glass house in Lalbagh, Bangalore. --Kprateek88 11:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline good composition but badly overexposed sky --Ikiwaner 19:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Fatehpur, India, --Kprateek88 11:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline interesting image with detail in the shadows, quite hard barrel distortion that could be removed --Ikiwaner 19:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline no perspective correction, overexposed sky, flat composition --Ikiwaner 19:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Zalmoxes was a genus of dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous --LadyofHats 07:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Decline There are some black stains between the legs and the arms. They should been removed. Otherwise nice drawing -- Simonizer 09:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Aucasaurus was a medium-sized Argentinian theropod dinosaur of the Santonian stage-LadyofHats 16:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Decline There are some black stains in front of the last dinosaur in the back and between the legs of the middle one. They should been removed. Otherwise nice drawing -- Simonizer 09:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Fatehpur, India, --Kprateek88 11:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Image blurred and unfocused due to exposure settings - Alvesgaspar 12:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination the cell membrane bilayer--LadyofHats 07:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion This is a quality illustration. norro 11:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Aeshna cyanea. --Lestat 17:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion I don't really like the environment, but technically it's appropriate as far as I can see. norro 11:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Sculpture in WPKiW. --Lestat 16:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Underexposed, misses contrast. i would support an edited version-LadyofHats 03:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Crab spider Xysticus sp. created and uploaded by Olaf Leillinger Fantastic picture! Nominated by --Jnpet 06:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice. norro 11:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination steam lokomobile --norro 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion you seem to prefer straight foward compositions --LadyofHats 03:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination salame --norro 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion not my favorite subject, but i must admit that there is certain dificulty in it. -LadyofHats 03:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationEpisyrphus balteatus --norro 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion i would have liked it more if the tail was on focus. but the detail you achieve from the head is amazing. will you try doing it FP - LadyofHats 03:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination three Willow catkins. --norro 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion a very nice image- LadyofHats 03:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Caterpillar of Deilephila elpenor --Przykuta 20:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline the first one was much better done. this one is rather noisy-LadyofHats 08:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Lilium. --Lestat 16:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion i like the intensity of the colors. -LadyofHats 08:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Wet type human earwax on swab. --Gmaxwell 14:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion I don't like this photo, but quality is very good. Lestat 17:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Review From a technical point of view, it's a great photo. I wouldn't hang it on A1 canvas in my hall, though. Anthony cfc 18:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Supermarine Spitfire XVI --norro 16:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion still a bit noisy but much better than the original--LadyofHats 08:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination He is handome. --Ltshears 19:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Decline he is handsome but moved the head when the phto was made. specially the eyes and nose are blury in full view-LadyofHats 07:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Peacock mite, Tuckerella sp. Created by US Department of Agriculture. Truly amazing! Nominated by --Jnpet 09:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Little grainy, but for this type of photography QI. Lestat 16:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry, no taked by a Wikimedian --~~~~
Nomination Piotr Schmidt. Photo taken on 1st Silesian Jazz Festiwal. --Lestat 19:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Technically OK, and I quite like it! The only -minor- issue is the image name CyrilB 22:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline is there a way to increase a bit the contrast in this picture? it is not a bad image but it would need a bit of help.LadyofHats 08:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Caterpillar of Euthrix potatoria --Przykuta 20:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Wonderful, but not sure about the resolution. norro 23:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)--i would say it is on the edge of the allowed resolution. specially concidering the subgect —the preceding unsigned comment is byLadyofHats (talk • contribs)
Nomination Main altar in church in Panewniki. --Lestat 19:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline overexposed and blury -LadyofHats 08:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination The Lincoln Memorial, south wall interior. The engraving of the Gettysburg Address centered in the image.--Gmaxwell 19:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent, good job. Arjun 23:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Comment: a pity that the lighting of the fresco painting is not good - Alvesgaspar 12:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A close up of peacock --Ltshears 20:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent focus and colours. I personally find the crop a little to tight and the bg a little disturbing. Otherwise i would nominate it for FP -- Simonizer 13:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Dawn on the Great Alpine Road --norro 16:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion ... Sunshine climate, relax on the way... it's OK. QI. --Lestat 12:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Meadow Pavilion at Wolf Trap National park --Gmaxwell 19:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Great--Simonizer 12:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Mercedes-Benz prototypes in the MB-Museum --AngMoKio 21:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Yes. --norro 10:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Malachite --Luc Viatour 11:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion it has some jpg aberrations on full view, but still it has enough to be QI-LadyofHats 22:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A Karst Shepherd --Pharaoh Hound 13:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline unfortunate illumination--Simonizer 10:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A female satin bowerbird --Benjamint444 01:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Blurry, grainy, the DOF is too narrow (the beak should be in focus), purple fringing on the top of the beak. --Pharaoh Hound 13:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Panorama of Glarus. --Leyo 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline It is a bit overexposed. Nice stitching though --Digon3 18:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination El Palau de les Arts Reina Sofía in Valencia --Arad 17:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Godd nightshot--Simonizer 10:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Ciutat de les Arts i les Ciències --Arad 17:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Though I'm not a fan of night shots, technically this one is very well executed. Lycaon 18:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion though a bit small, sharp where it matters. Lycaon 18:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Echinops flower --Ayacop 16:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice. Not too sharp, but sufficient at this resoluton. --norro 13:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination The heart of Prague and Europe --Karelj 22:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Resolution too low (see QI guidelines). --norro 19:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination A Belgian Tervuren --Pharaoh Hound 12:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Bad perspective A.J. 11:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Medieval beggar. --Lestat 16:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline The lower part of the subject is cut off. Don't you need authorization in Poland for taking picture of someone? the approval of the "beggar" should be mentionned on the picture's info. --Diligent 09:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Yes but subject is a friend of photographer ;) --WarX 14:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Bird view of terrace fields, China --Diligent 07:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Blurry details, little noisy. --Lestat 19:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationAnser anser --Pharaoh Hound 13:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Overexposed parts. --Lestat 19:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationHarpia harpyja --Pharaoh Hound 13:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Cut one wing. --Lestat 19:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationCygnus buccinator --Pharaoh Hound 13:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Needs white balancing to bring out the texture. Otherwise good quality. norro 19:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationAgelastica alni --Pharaoh Hound 13:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Great picture, but resolution is too small for QI --Simonizer 08:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC) - Please respect the size of the animal - and this is already a macro shot using special equipment! -- aka 17:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Sorbus aucuparia. --Lestat 15:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion I would like to see the subject to stand out against the background more clearly, but quality is sufficient as far as I can see. --norro 11:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Horseracing at Churchill Downs --Pharaoh Hound 13:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Very good capture --AngMoKio 16:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
NominationTrithemis annulata --AngMoKio 21:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Promotion Good DOF, no artifacts, sharp. QI. --Lestat 19:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Nomination Stanford's Clark Center --Starwiz 08:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Decline Good composition, nice and sharp. But the overexposed parts must be fixed. Alvesgaspar 10:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
First of all overexposure isn't something that could be fixed. Especially at night with artificial lights partial or full exposure is something that can't be avoided completely. The contrast of a lamp in the dark is too high both for a camera and for a human eye. In this case I like the composition and that there is no perspective distortion because the photographer climbed up on the balcony. It's perfectly sharp for a shutter speed of 25 s! Overexposure in all RGB channels is limited to smaller areas which is very good under these circumstances. --Ikiwaner21:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Alvesgaspar. even if it is a night shot and there is a hard contrast to be expected. there is a proper midle point. Meaning, a point in wich you win the maximum in usefull detail. in the case of this picture, being less exposed would mean to loose detail the trees in the background and some of the windows at the sides. but would also mean to win detail on the midle. and on the floor at the front. from the point of view of composition this elements "weight" more and should be payed more atention to. in resume i also decline this nomination -LadyofHats13:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1 Support 2 Oppose ---> Not Promoted
Nomination Another version was nominated before. This one is in focus. We don't have much pictures of Infants on Wiki. And this one is artistic (the baby's face) and encyclopedic. --Arad 13:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
how to improve it: if it is a "film" camera a higer iso would have helped. in general more light would have allowed a shaper image. also about 90% of blury effect comes from a shaking hand and in this case a moving baby. to place the camera in a stable position, with a higer speed.
Nomination Karpecki square in Mikołów. --Lestat 10:33, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 10:33
Decline from the point of view of composition there is no really any central point. the eye goes back and foward between the tree and the house. there is also no clear reason why did you chose such a composition. there is slight noise in full view. but i find the composition problem more anoying -LadyofHats 23:08, 29 January 2007
I dont find the composition that bad. Only thing on this picture that disturbs me ist the cut off woman at the bottom left side. But the quality is ok in my opinion. I would promote it for QI. -- Simonizer11:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
as i said before from the point of view of the photograph it is tecnically well done. the composition is what i find too dull and non concentrated. if you still want to promote it. then go ahead, i have not a trong oposition in this case -LadyofHats08:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think there are other issues wich prevent the picture to be QI: the quality (grain and sharpness) is poor, which is most visible in the darker parts of the building; there is an annoying tilt in the building; motion blur makes the leaves a green amorphus mass. Alvesgaspar12:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
_3.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_front.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_meadow_pavilion.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
