Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 16 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Jesuitengasse_1_in_Ladenburg_(1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Jesuitengasse 1 in Ladenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this needs perspective correction. --Der Angemeldete 13:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Milseburg 10:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good to me. --Sebring12Hrs 17:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Tourcoing_usine_masurel_rue_de_paris.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Former François Masurel hosiery factory, Rue de Paris, in Tourcoing, France --Velvet 10:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 11:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Soory, but this shadow on the wall kills it for me. --Der Angemeldete 21:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
     Support A big shadow, but this is very sharp. This is not FP nomination. --Sebring12Hrs 19:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Figura_Serpiente,_horóscopo_chino.A741873.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Snake figure,Chinese horoscope. --Rjcastillo 03:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Comment Please improve the categorization. --XRay 04:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Categories for the location should be exist. --XRay 09:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks heavy processed in the background and there's CA around the signpost. Sorry, that's not a good one. --Der Angemeldete 19:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • I don't think so. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Well, if not processed, alright. There is still Aberration, what else should I say? Look at the railing --Der Angemeldete 23:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I uploaded a new version. --Rjcastillo 03:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Nope. The blurry green outlines are still there. And beside of the that they are in some other pictures you nominated with those motives, too.--Der Angemeldete 12:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is still a problem with the categorization. Please add a category for the location and remove the overcategorization. --XRay 05:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Rjcastillo 21:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 05:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 12:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Figura_Caballo,_horóscopo_chino.A741875.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Horse figure, Chinese horoscope. --Rjcastillo 03:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please add a category for the location. --XRay 10:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Same as mentioned to Snake figure. --Der Angemeldete 19:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is still a problem with the categorization. Please add a category for the location and remove the overcategorization. --XRay 05:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Rjcastillo 21:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 05:30, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
     Comment Then please strike your opposing vote! You cannot support and oppose an image at the same time. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
  • I haven't set an opposing vote. It was a comment. I don't know who changed it to an opposing vote. --XRay 06:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  • I am sorry. You are perfectly right. User:Peulle did that when reformatting the section, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AQuality_images_candidates%2Fcandidate_list&diff=731129824&oldid=731129639. The link does not work here because its addition leads to a syntax error. I assume that the vote was added by accident. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Hi! :) Yes, that was me. As per the Consensual Review rules, an opposing vote is assumed when somebody moves an image to CR: "You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed).". --Peulle 08:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)