Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 16 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Intercity_trains_Bochum_Hbf_during_winter_chaos.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Two connected Intercity trains Bochum Hbf during winter chaos and pandemic --Etaped 10:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. the post to the left distracts the composition and its cut --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  CommentThanks for your feedback. I agree that composition is denied here due to the fact that there is this pole present at the station, however this photo has more journalistic character of the situation. I'll upload a cropped version with rule-of-thirds to focus on the subjects, people boarding the train and the train interconnection --Etaped 22:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. better now --Wilfredor 23:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good quality. Wilfredor, your votes cancel out. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 12:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good use of B&W --Tagooty 13:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good as B&W and as journalist style image --LexKurochkin 14:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. --XRay 08:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 00:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File:15_de_Septiembre_20202_en_el_Zócalo_10.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fireworks at the Main National Holidays in the Zócalo of Mexico City during the COVID-19 pandemic. By User:EneasMx --ProtoplasmaKid 07:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality.Strong noise --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
    I agree, there's noise present. Regarding the camera setting and type of shot not preventable. However I think the noise could be fixable with profiled denoising. Could you try? --Etaped 22:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
    Maybe you could try fix it using topaz denoise from the raw file --Wilfredor 23:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree - dramatic photo, but the noise is too strong. -- Ikan Kekek 12:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 12:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Plaque_au_compositeur_Maurice_Emmanuel_à_Beaune_(janvier_2021).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plaque dédiée au compositeur Maurice Emmanuel à Beaune (janvier 2021) au 39 rue de Lorraine où il vécu de 1869 à 1880. --Benoît Prieur 19:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Moroder 06:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Upper side is not sharp enough. --LexKurochkin 07:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree to Kurochkin. This picture is to unsharp, sorry. --Geoprofi Lars 13:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A picture of a simple sign should be sharper, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 00:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)