Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 15 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Marsh_sandpiper_(Tringa_stagnatilis).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Marsh sandpiper (Tringa stagnatilis), Ethiopia --Charlesjsharp 10:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeUnsharp and some parts blown IMO. --Kadellar 17:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The head isn't sharp. --Basotxerri 07:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 01:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Marabou_stork_(Leptoptilos_crumenifer)_spreading_wings_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Marabou stork (Leptoptilos crumeniferus), Ethiopia --Charlesjsharp 11:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until it's not tilted. --Kadellar 17:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's not tilted Kadellar. Check out the reflections please. Charlesjsharp 23:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment Exactly, check out the reflection. Knee up and knee down should be vertical. -Kadellar 09:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
      • Apologies Kadellar, I've been looking at a different version on my computer. Now corrected. Charlesjsharp 11:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
        • No problem, thanks for the correction. --Kadellar 06:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough IMO.--Fischer.H 10:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Fischer.H -- Ikan Kekek 01:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Persépolis,_Irán,_2016-09-24,_DD_54.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Relief of dignitaries at court ceremony, Apadana, Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 08:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Uh-oh! This is blurred due to camera shake - 1/50s at 65mm can sometime become tricky to handhold at that high MP-count of your sensor. --Granada 08:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment As there has been no feedback in 2 days and I believe that this is a QI, I'd like to discuss it at CR --Poco a poco 17:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support More then good, colours look realistic&authentic --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Solid QI of a great motif. -- Ikan Kekek 09:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good image. -- Spurzem 19:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good shot, Good QI -- Sixflashphoto 05:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Calotes_versicolor_(Oriental_garden_lizard).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Calotes versicolor (Oriental garden lizard) on a wooden step in Don Det, Si Phan Don, Laos. --Basile Morin 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Unscharf, kein QI --Fischer.H 10:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment First : Speak English, please. Secondly : this is a high resolution file of 14 Mpix, which is plenty sharp at more than 5 MPix on the main part of the body. Regards -- Basile Morin 12:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - It's sharp enough on the head, but what accounts for the drastic reduction in sharpness between what I guess is the neck and the body? -- Ikan Kekek 01:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Certainly the depth of field, but the scales of the lizard are also of a paler color between the neck and the tail. See this version of the same lizard that looks sharper on the tail, whereas this impression of blurriness on the body just comes from its natural color -- Basile Morin 02:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the explanation and example. This is a QI, IMO.  Support -- Ikan Kekek 08:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 17:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support for me too. Charlesjsharp 11:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)