Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 14 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Il_Palazzo_dei_Sindacati,_ora_Camera_del_Lavoro,_Milano._Veduta_prospettica_della_facciata_(1930-1933).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Building of Palazzo dei Sindacati, Milan, 19301933 ~~~~
  • Promotion
     Oppose too much dark zones, perspective wrong --Ezarate 21:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. --MB-one 21:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. The choice of perspective and exposure is obviously intended and looks realistic. --Smial 10:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perspective might look wrong but the building was built on an irregular lot: the perspective is irregular by itself already. Dark areas are intended to give depth to the photograph.Paolobon140 (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Yao_River_2019-11-01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Yao River, China by User:Nbfreeh --undefined 09:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice. Can we get English description and fix the right side that is leaning out? --Podzemnik 09:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
    @Podzemnik: If the image is not nominated by the author, please ping the author for such requests. I added the english description and I think the camera was about at 29.8747, 121.5514 with view direction north-west.I also added some notes to the image. This image has a similar view angle. @Nbfreeh: Please check them! --D-Kuru 02:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry but I'm going to oppose this. To me the building on the right is leaning and it's just too obvious. --Podzemnik 01:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. --Peulle 07:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
  • thanks for inform me @D-Kuru: , I still think the right building on this photo is not obvious, it's a part of skyline.--Nbfreeh 17:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Sydney_(AU),_Darling_Harbour_--_2019_--_2073.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Flag at Darling Harbour, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia --XRay 04:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I feel like we should discuss this one a bit further. There are chromatic aberrations and the bottom crop is very tight compared to the top one.--Peulle 08:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done It's fixed now. The CAs weren't easy to find. --XRay 17:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
  • OK, I'm a bit  Neutral to this one now; I suppose we need images of flags in the wind too, not just images where the whole flag is visible. Still not wild about the crop, though.--Peulle 09:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 23:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry. I don't think the flag of Australia is presented well here. Quality images of flags should show all the details, even if they are waving in the wind. A star cannot be seen here and the rest is too crumpled for me. --Milseburg 11:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --Kallerna 05:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
  • @Kallerna: Please no oppose vote without a reason. --XRay 05:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Nothing to object here --MB-one 13:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Mur_et_plafond_de_la_terrasse_d'Ali_Qāpu.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Aali Qapu in 2018. --Lexy iris 22:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment This is good enough for me, especially considering the size, but you have to credit the photographer. Look at the directions in the upper part of the page for how to do that. -- Ikan Kekek 07:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Chenspec, that's not the question, and why do you insist on never addressing any point that was objected to when you take it upon yourself to try to overrule people? -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question Chenspec has been doing this for a long time now. I've had enough. How can I report this behaviour to the admins?--Peulle 13:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I have set up a discussion here.--Peulle 09:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose slightly tilted. --MB-one 12:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)