Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 07 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Syzygium_fruit.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Syzygium samarangense (wax jambu) in a plate, with cross section. --Basile Morin 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeI disagree, insufficient "Low1" far away from Q1, for more then three clear points. The other other one, too (hs). --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Very sharp! -- Ikan Kekek 01:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality IMO. --Basotxerri 10:16, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support PumpkinSky 17:16, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 08:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Glockenmuseum_Gescher.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Westfälisches Glockenmuseum in Gescher --Tetzemann 00:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I disagree: the perspective should be corrected and there are CAs on the streetlight on the right. --Basotxerri 19:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Fixed the perspective and cut the streetlight out. But what does the shortcut "CAs" mean? I'm still learning...Tetzemann (talk)
  • Chromatic abberrations. PumpkinSky 13:08, 2 February 2018 (UTC)~
  • There are still some CAs, I've left a note on the image. --Basotxerri 16:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thx for the Feedback!! Is there a possibility to work against CAs with Affinity Photo generally AFTER I took the photo? Or is there a chance to do it better and it maybe won't work because of a lack my "cheap" camera BEFORE I took the photo? Glad to hear from you! Is the perspective better? Tetzemann (talk)
  • Hi Tetzemann, yes, CAs are generally removed in post-processing and Affinity Photo should be capable to remove them. You can google for it, it seems that there are some videos about it out there. Some camera lenses produce more CAs than others but we all here have to struggle against them in certain lighting situations. --Basotxerri 09:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO Good enough for Q1- CA´s here are not grave --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Affinity have the option in "lens correction" just push the button "Chromatic Abberation Reduction".Affinity looks like (for me) like a upgraded Version of non CC-Lightroom. Most important point is lens correction, here is still PS the Master, all uses ACR from adobe. But take care, Basotxerri is the Master of CA;-)--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Exactly, I find them all --Basotxerri 08:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the explanation Hans-Jürgen Neubert. I watched some videos and tried to do my best. Unfortunately i have just the jpg and not the raw of this photo. So i tried it with "Farbsäume entfernen" and could do something against the blue CAs. And at least I learned something new, so: Thank you :-) Tetzemann (talk)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 08:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Dan_Nadel_tla_bruscia_a_Urtijëi_Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Downtown Urtijëi with Christmas decoration in Gröden. --Moroder 10:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 17:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 21:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support good for qi --Ralf Roletschek 14:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell. I know it's a night shot, but I can't find anything sharp.--Peulle 11:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Clouds_passing_Blue_Super_Moon_1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination First in series of three photos of clouds passing over the rare Super Moon-Blue Moon-Blood Moon-Lunar Eclipse sequence of 30-31 Januaray 2018 in North America. This is the Super Moon phase. Virginia Beach, Virginia. --PumpkinSky 23:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp and noisy. --Ermell 20:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unscharf, kein Qualitätsbild für mich. --Fischer.H 08:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment ISO is only 200 so it's not ISO noise. The clouds were moving in exteremly fast, you could see them moving. This will naturally make things unsharp and cause light diffraction. PumpkinSky 20:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
      • @Smial: See my prior comment. This only happened in the photos with the clouds. I took about 24 photos and uploaded 5. I think it's from the vapors in the clouds, which were moving very quickly. PumpkinSky 15:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 09:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Clouds_passing_Blue_Super_Moon_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Second in series of three photos of clouds passing over the rare Super Moon-Blue Moon-Blood Moon-Lunar Eclipse sequence of 30-31 Januaray 2018 in North America. This is the Super Moon phase. Virginia Beach, Virginia. --PumpkinSky 23:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeSame like the others. No QI for me. --Ermell 20:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unscharf, kein Qualitätsbild für mich. --Fischer.H 08:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment ISO is only 200 so it's not ISO noise. The clouds were moving in exteremly fast, you could see them moving. This will naturally make things unsharp and cause light diffraction. PumpkinSky 20:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
      • @Smial: See my prior comment. This only happened in the photos with the clouds. I took about 24 photos and uploaded 5. I think it's from the vapors in the clouds, which were moving very quickly. PumpkinSky 15:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This kind of photography is nothing for handheld (I assume that after seeing the exposure time). There is noise and it comes from having to lift up the exposure during processing --Poco a poco 10:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 09:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Clouds_passing_Blue_Super_Moon_3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Third in series of three photos of clouds passing over the rare Super Moon-Blue Moon-Blood Moon-Lunar Eclipse sequence of 30-31 Januaray 2018 in North America. This is the Super Moon phase. Virginia Beach, Virginia. --PumpkinSky 23:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A lot of noise und not really sharp. --Ermell 20:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unscharf, kein Qualitätsbild für mich. --Fischer.H 08:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment ISO is only 200 so it's not ISO noise. The clouds were moving in exteremly fast, you could see them moving. This will naturally make things unsharp and cause light diffraction. PumpkinSky 20:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 Comment There are tons of speckels in the image, it is unlikely that these all are hot spots. How come? --Smial 10:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
      • @Smial: See my prior comment. This only happened in the photos with the clouds. I took about 24 photos and uploaded 5. I think it's from the vapors in the clouds, which were moving very quickly. PumpkinSky 15:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 09:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Love Padlocks around the world 001 (Mockba).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Love Paddlocks around the world (Moscow) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment It needs a perspective improvement. It is deformed and it is leaning to the right --Michielverbeek 11:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have tried to play with Lens correction in PS, but I´m not happy. The "medal tree" is not straight (in reality) and ground is the arc from the Luzhkov Bridge. A.Savin have a good one from Vodootvodny Canal-Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Indeed the medal tree is not really straight (so it might be correct), but the buildings left in the background (see my note) have to be straight, but they are not. BTW, I realize it is a very difficult composition so I would like to hear more opinions. --Michielverbeek 14:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Pls keep in mind the medal tree is empty. It should not be straight!--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 18:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looking at the buildings through the fence, the perspective correction has not been successful.--Peulle 11:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)