Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 04 2015

• 
  • Nomination Entlebucher Biosphere Reserve cheese. A semi hard cheese from non pasteurized milk, Made by Xaver Suter, Finsterwald near Entlebuch, Luzern, Switzerland --Hubertl 02:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Thibaut120094 03:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Raw milk Reblochon colombière from Stans, Aargau - Maître fromager affineur Rolf Beeler --Hubertl 02:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Hard to look at this while your stomach is still empty. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 02 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farmhouse Cheddar, Isle of Mull Cheese, Sgriob-ruadh Farm (Gaelic: meaning "Red Furrow" and pronounced Ski-brooah), Tobermory Isle of Mull, Argyll and Bute. Traditionally made, matured for a minimum of 18 months. Cloth bound cylinders of about 50 lbs. --Hubertl 02:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Collywobbles goes stronger. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 02 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breda, Polish chapel --Michielverbeek 23:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Halavar 23:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historical view of Trier, Germany, by Braun&Hogenberg: Civitates Orbis Terrarum, vol. 1. Picture taken from an original copperplate print, dating 1572. --Palauenc05 21:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI -- Spurzem 21:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rome, Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls, courtyard, Rome, Italy. --Dnalor 01 19:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 19:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rome, Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls, courtyard, Rome, Italy. --Dnalor 01 19:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 19:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Little tiger blue (Tarucus balkanicus) --Zeynel Cebeci 18:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An island in Kandy lake. --AntanO 17:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charleroi in 1873. Carte topographique de la Belgique en couleurs (1865 - 1930) au 1/20.000. La première édition en chromophotolithographie a été réalisée par le Dépôt de la Guerre entre 1865 et 1880. --Jmh2o 17:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pößnecker Straße in Ranis, Thuringia, Germany. --Code 17:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Franz Defregger --Moroder 16:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 17:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vineyards of Hallgarten as seen on a winter day. Hallgarten is visble in the background, as well as the Hallgarter Zange mountain --DXR 16:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Friedenskirche in Potsdam as seen from northeast --DXR 16:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Location Natuurterrein The Famberhorst. Incident thaw.
    Famberhorst 16:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Courtyard of the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls, Rome, Italy. --Dnalor 01 16:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oia, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 16:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oia, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 16:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rein abbey, total view as seen from the east, Rein, Styria, Austria. --Dnalor 01 15:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Steindy 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rein abbey, total view as seen from the north, Rein, Styria, Austria. --Dnalor 01 15:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 17:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trier, St. Paulin, headstone --Berthold Werner 15:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK for QI --NorbertNagel 16:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Saint Paul in Rome --Livioandronico2013 14:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 15:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wat Inthakin Sadue Muang, Chiang Mai --DerFussi 14:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 15:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moka pot: ground coffee reservoir --Coyau 13:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Very good --Livioandronico2013 16:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shops in Pristina, Kosovo --Poco a poco 12:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 15:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Embankment before the storm. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Embankment. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 11:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway tracks between the stations Wiesbaden-Ost and Wiesbaden-Biebrich. --Code 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 11:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
    (Edit conflict) I think focal point is a few metres too close, but otherwise good. ~~~~
• 
  • Nomination Kg Pahu, Kota Belud, Sabah: Rice farmers, having a rest from work in their rice paddy --Cccefalon 09:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:22, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: rapidKL bus at the station at Jalan Pudu in front of Hotel Furama, Pudu --Cccefalon 09:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Hall of the Chan She Shu Yuen Clan Association --Cccefalon 09:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kimanis, Sabah: Residential buildings of the Oil Palm Plantation of SAWIT Kinabalu. --Cccefalon 09:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kg. Tamalang, Kudat, Sabah: Basel Christian Church Malaysia (BCCM) Tamalang --Cccefalon 09:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Metropolitan Line train at Amersham. Mattbuck 09:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Melton Hall. Mattbuck 09:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor picture composition. The dark shadow area is too large and the tree trunks deny look at the building. In addition, the building is arbitrarily cut off, but the bushes to the left in the picture unnecessarily large. --Steindy 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 23 Wojska Polskiego Street in Paczków 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 23 Wojska Polskiego Street in Paczków 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --DXR 08:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) on the water (mixed pair) --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice and QI -- Spurzem 13:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cherry blossoms (Prunus cerasus) --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gruyère is a half-hard to hard yellow cheese, named after the town of Gruyères in Switzerland, and originated in the cantons of Fribourg, Vaud, Neuchâtel, Jura, and Berne. Le Gruyère AOP Réserve BIO has an age of minimum 18 month --Hubertl 06:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not flash about the Bio, but there are few better things than a Gruyere that starts cracking up on its own ;-) And good quality. --DXR 08:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farmhouse Cheddar, Isle of Mull Cheese, Sgriob-ruadh Farm (Gaelic: meaning "Red Furrow" and pronounced Ski-brooah), Tobermory Isle of Mull, Argyll and Bute. Traditionally made, matured for the minimum of 18 months. Cloth bound cylinders of about 50 lbs.--Hubertl 06:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and they produce absolutely outstanding cheddar on Isle of Mull --ArildV 06:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L’Etivaz AOP is a half-hard alpine cheese, produced from 10 May to 10 October each year. Made from the raw milk --Hubertl 06:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The upper Fusine lake, Fusine di Valromana at low water, Tarvisio, Friuli --Hubertl 06:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gruyère is a half-hard to hard yellow cheese, named after the town of Gruyères in Switzerland, and originated in the cantons of Fribourg, Vaud, Neuchâtel, Jura, and Berne --Hubertl 06:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:00, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Börshuset, Stockholm. --ArildV 06:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Beautiful mood, excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:10, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tele2 Arena from south. --ArildV 06:19, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stairs to the church square of the church of Saint Viktor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --ArildV 06:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of Lüdinghauser Tor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the church of Saint Viktor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stairs to the church square of the church of Saint Viktor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Location Natuurterrein The Famberhorst. Thin layer of ice on Jonker Sloot.
    Famberhorst 05:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees Group to beach well of Nederhorst.
    Famberhorst 05:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment A little bit noisy and please look for green CAs at the trees at the right.--XRay 05:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
     Done CA correctie.--Famberhorst 07:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support OK now.--XRay 08:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winterly forest at Saint Martin, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Nice image, sharpness could be better. But IMO still QI. --XRay 05:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bus stop and restaurant «Messnerwirtin» at Sankt Bartlmae, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Bartholomew, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Some noise in the sky, otherwise very nice and good quality.--ArildV 06:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Effect by the sunset with a branch in the foreground, (the sun behind) --Ivan2010 02:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline That may be a nice experiment or a documentary, but it is not a good photo. Sorry! --Steindy 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Effect by the sunset with a branch in the foreground, (the sun on side) --Ivan2010 01:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline That may be a nice experiment or a documentary, but it is not a good photo. Sorry! --Steindy 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Concert hall on the Gendarmenmarkt in Berlin-Mitte - Good quality, Successfully in many articles --Denis Apel 11:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Below minimun size requirement. --Code 13:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Deutscher Dom (german cathedral) in Berlin - Good quality, Successfully in many articles -- Denis Apel 12:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Below minimun size requirement. --Code 13:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Fortuna by Johannes Benk (1896) at Hofburg Palace at sunset --Hubertl 21:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait during a football game. --AmBu 21:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Steindy 01:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A private of the Kremlin Regiment at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Moscow. --Dmitry Ivanov 21:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Primula veris or in German Schlüsselblume -- Spurzem 20:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 10:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turdoides squamiceps, Yeroham National Park, Israel. --מינוזיג 18:21, , 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turdoides squamiceps, Yeroham National Park, Israel. --מינוזיג 18:21, , 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reconstruction of Breite Straße in Pößneck, Thuringia, Germany. --Code 16:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Embankment before the storm. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 15:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:23, 01 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned part of the village of Soganli, Turkey --Bgag 15:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Image needs more sharpness. --Halavar 15:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 00:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) in flight in Venice at sunrise. Renomination [1]. --Dnalor 01 13:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)*  Comment its already promoted, there is no doubt, probably there is a mistake happens. You should ask Dschwen--Hubertl 14:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Done Thank you, C messier told me that it wasn't promoted and to renominate it, but now I've asked Dschwen what to do. --Dnalor 01 15:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
    I withdraw my renomination because Dschwen told me here that the file is already promoted and I am allowed to set the QI-template on the file-site by myself. Is this okay that way? --Dnalor 01 16:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Yes, of course! Have a nice evening!--Hubertl 18:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
     Done Thank you, done! --Dnalor 01 08:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cologne, Germany: Ship "Carl Straat" at Cologne Southbridge (Kölner Südbrücke) --Cccefalon 08:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment The upper part of the image is blurred. See the note. Maybe a crop would be a good option. --Halavar 09:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
     Info I would call it DoF. The foreground with the ship is pinsharp, right? I think, cropping the background would leave the ship unbalanced and framed too tight. --Cccefalon 10:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, but I can't promote image with that pinsharp, blurred area. --Halavar 10:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
    I would like to send this image to CR, because it meets QI criteria for the main subject, but has really bad bokeh. Perhaps we find a solution how this can be fixed in post processing. --Smial 12:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
    Thank you Smial, for giving another chance to the image. The bokeh isn't the most beautiful one, I agree. However, I cannot work at my desk the next days, so I better withdraw this version and try again with an updated version. Thanks again for reviewing. --Cccefalon 16:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Cccefalon Have you applied a filter on the top of the image? because the issue is that the upper parts of the main subject are also affected --Christian Ferrer 11:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cordyline australis 'Red Sensation' --Ram-Man 03:28, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose composition issues, the blurred area is disturbing --Christian Ferrer 09:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tête de femme en calcaire,Égypte, vers 300/200 av. J.C. - Musée du Louvre. --Siren-Com 22:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Too blue and IMO DoF not good enough. --XRay 08:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Illustration of St. Andrew the Apostle Cathedral. Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 21:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO too unsharp. --XRay 08:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carica papaya --Ram-Man 18:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. The image is good, but IMO the crop isn't good (see the leaf at the bottom) and the tripod at the left is disturbing. --XRay 08:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Codiaeum variegatum var. pictum --Ram-Man 18:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Barcelona, Hotel W and Aerial Tramway at beach --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Details missing and IMO too unsharp. --XRay 08:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of the Holy Trinity in Duszniki-Zdrój 1 --Jacek Halicki 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cladonia digitata, Tallinn Botanic Garden, Estonia --Poco a poco 19:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of St Mauritius, Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Nothing sharp. --Mattbuck 11:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Litter of Pope Leo XIII --Livioandronico2013 21:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Not in focus. --Mattbuck 11:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocca Albornoz (Narni) - Lateral view --Livioandronico2013 21:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment It needs perspective correction (check windows) and IMHO a bit unsharp. --C messier 17:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
    Agreed, unsharp, blurry at edges.  Oppose Mattbuck 11:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). Apery. Research Institute of Experimental Pathology and Therapy, Academy of Sciences of Abkhazia. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 13:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment No good photo of this pitiable animal: not sharp enough, low contrast, an no good crop. But this is only my opinion. -- Spurzem 14:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
    I agree with Spurzem, and also would decline anyway due to the bars. Mattbuck 11:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination USO-FCG - 20140913 - Ruck --Pleclown 11:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mattbuck 11:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bathhouse close to Villa Rottenstein, Sankt Georgen am Laengsee, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
    There is CA, the bottom crop is unfortunate and I wonder whether you offer a more generous crop at the top Poco a poco 12:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Not done --Mattbuck 10:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hong Kong island --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Right hand third of the image is dark, seems a little blurry and distorted, and is possibly also tilted. Maybe that part could be cropped off --Bahnfrend 15:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)  Done cropped to square and a bit brighter. --Ralf Roletschek 13:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose - Left size is blurred, lots of bloom. Mattbuck 10:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Copy of a statue of Silvio Spaventa in front of the ministry of finance, Via Venti Settembre (Rome). The original is in Bomba, province of Chieti --Livioandronico2013 08:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline The statue seems out of focus --Christian Ferrer 06:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
    I agree with Christian. Mattbuck 10:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Katarinavägen_January_2015.jpg

• Nomination The street Katarinavägen. Södermalm, Stockholm. --ArildV 19:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion There is a black curved stripe in top side of the image. --Zcebeci 21:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC) Easy to fix, small crop done. --ArildV 21:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC) @Zcebeci: --ArildV 14:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 11:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC
•  Support I like. Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Concesionario_de_Mercedes-Benz,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2013-03-30,_DD_24.JPG

• Nomination Mercedes-Benz dealership, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 19:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
  I disagree. Can you fix the tilt? Perhaps some perspective correction/rotation? --Colin 19:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA (red - green) -- Smial 15:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
•  New version Poco a poco 21:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support beautiful photo taken in the night---PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good after rework. The small burnt highlights and reflections are acceptable and unavoidable. -- Smial 12:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Beeston railway station MMB 38 222016.jpg

• Nomination 222016 at Beeston. Mattbuck 06:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Bgag 15:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Right side leaning to left. --Steindy 23:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Ikay now. --Steindy 23:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I believe I took my verticals from the bridge, as that seemed more likely to be straight than old wooden shelters on a sloped platform. Mattbuck 08:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
    • Check again – the (assumed) lamp post and the column of the way out stairs are leaning in, too. --Kreuzschnabel 15:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
      • I've done a correction - the post still leans, but I'd be surprised if it didn't, they're incredibly bad for verticals. Mattbuck 22:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
        •  Support OK now for me. Really hard to decide what’s vertical in reality here. Would you mind going back there armed with a water level to check thoroughly? --Kreuzschnabel 05:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

          Unfortunately I don't have need to travel to Nottingham anymore, but maybe one day. I do have an old friend who allegedly lives near the station. Mattbuck 19:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Verticals seems perfect (in my experience, lamp posts are often leaning indeed). Dark parts a little bit disturbing, especially at the right. But still QI. -- MJJR 14:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Suchum,_Małpiarnia,_Makak_rezus_(03).jpg

• Nomination The rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). Apery. Research Institute of Experimental Pathology and Therapy, Academy of Sciences of Abkhazia. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 01:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The ape is only in the eyes sharp and the hands and feet are cutted. --Steindy 00:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Steindy. Not a favourable image of this animal. --Kreuzschnabel 15:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Pennsylvania Route 339 in Mifflinville.jpg

• Nomination Pennsylvania Route 339. Jakec 00:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline  Comment IMO a better crop is necessary.--XRay 10:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  Specifically? Jakec 17:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Let's ask for another opinion.--XRay 16:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
  Weak  Oppose IMO the empty area at the bottom is too big.--XRay 06:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:St-vincent sur jard , la côte (2).JPG

• Nomination La côte vendéenne à Saint Vincent sur Jard, Vendée, France.PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Tilted. Please correct this faults before you nominate pictures like this. As a matter of respect! I am not here to discuss such errors! --Hubertl 21:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Sorry - This is an unfortunate mistake on my part  Fixed It's now right. Thanks for your review..--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It´s ok for me now.--Hubertl 04:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Löwenzahn Entwicklungsstadium (Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia).JPG

• Nomination Common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale)--NoRud 16:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion to evaluate please
•  Comment the quality is ok, try to crop it on the left side, the composition is getting much better. Will be QI for me then.--Hubertl 10:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
   Done settled,to evaluate please new
•  Neutral No signatures. Who is talking here to the reviewers? --Cccefalon 13:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Done settled,to evaluate please new.--NoRud 14:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A really nice picture, the composition now is great! --Hubertl 17:17, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jkadavoor 16:14, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Nilgänse (Alopochen aegyptiacus).JPG

• Nomination Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiacus)--NoRud 16:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion  Comment Image should be in the proper category (or categories). There shouldn't be any red links in the categories. Also, when you use English language template, the names should be in English, not in German language. --Halavar 18:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
   Donesettled,to evaluate please
•  Comment try to make a tighter crop to concentrate more on the subject. Its QI then for me.--Hubertl 10:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
   Done settled,to evaluate please new
•  Neutral No signatures. --Cccefalon 13:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Done settled,to evaluate please new.--NoRud 14:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I like it now! QI for me!--Hubertl 17:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful composition, I like--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Rjcastillo 13:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Blässhuhn (Fulica atra) young bird.JPG

• Nomination Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) young bird. --NoRud 16:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion I think "discuss" isn't needed until "promotion" or "support" collides with "oppose", but no problem:  Comment The water confused me in full size, but I like a ~1300×1000 crop (bird with its mirror at the bottom). Funny colours. –Be..anyone 23:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
   Donesettled,to evaluate please new
•  Neutral No signatures. --Cccefalon 13:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Done settled,to evaluate please new.--NoRud 14:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support, now fine. –Be..anyone 07:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 14 M5.jpg

• Nomination M5 at Clapton. Mattbuck 07:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Oppose The large dark area to the left and right of the road is only black and not marked. --Steindy 23:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  I wasn't trying for a documentary photo of the trees. --Mattbuck 23:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I think, its an interesting composition, the idea would get lost when removing the dark parts. --Hubertl 10:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose for others --Livioandronico2013 13:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

  Could you explain your reasoning here? If you mean you think the trees are too dark, I ask what would the photo gain if they were brighter, except stuff which would distract from the subject of the image? It was night, it was dark, the trees were dark - that's natural conditions, even under long exposure. Mattbuck 14:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment color noise in the sky, the blurred tree at left is a bit disturbing --Christian Ferrer 17:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

  OK, you're probably right on that. I'd rather withdraw a bad image than have it promoted when it shouldn't be. Mattbuck 19:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

• Good evening Matt,Christian responded before of me, not to get the impression that i'm playing. You've declined photos and I have not disputed, everyone here believe that their photos are QI but sometimes wrong. More photos are not good for be promoted? I can say only my namely that it is not my way. Buonasera --Livioandronico2013 21:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Abbatiale_Saint-Gilles_08.jpg

• Nomination Abbey of Saint-Gilles, Saint-Gilles, Gard, France. --Christian Ferrer 15:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion. --Steindy 00:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment In my defense it's the wall that you can see here on the left and as you can see there is a fence so I could not back and the lens focal length is at its wider position (14mm). It was for me impossible to take an entire face view of this wall without a perspective distortion and unfortunately I do not know make photo assemblies. But of course it change nothing and maybe it is not a QI. --Christian Ferrer 12:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support The distortion appears wavy and very difficult to correct. Otherwise it's of nice high quality. I may be in the minority regarding this type of distortion, but I think it's QI anyway. Ram-Man 13:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Steindy. Distortion is too strong. Maybe a VI anyways. --Code 06:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I now have looked at this picture now three or four times, but I can´t find any realistic solution. It´s just distorted.--Hubertl 04:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:41, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Cambodge.- la cité lacustre de Saray, (1).jpg

• Nomination la cité lacustre de Saray, Tonlé Sap Cambodge.PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose - Sorry, the boat is unsharp. --Dnalor 01 10:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

   Done Thanks for your note, I corrected sharpness on the boat --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

   Comment Okay maybe, but the people on the boat are not sharp anyway, sorry. --Dnalor 01 11:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

  OK! but people were moving on this boat--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose - While the background is sharp (albeit in need of perspective correction - left is vertical, right is not), the subject is at once unsharp, blurred and oversharpened. Mattbuck 19:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done perspective corrected and re-balancing the contrast of people.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Please care to take another look?
    • My main objection was the sharpness. That can't be fixed. Mattbuck 16:01, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Alstom Citadis 302 n°840 Boulingrin ASTUCE.jpg

• Nomination Tramway de Rouen --Billy69150 10:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
  Left side leaining in Poco a poco 13:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion  Not done --Mattbuck 23:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done --Billy69150 12:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  Still leaning in, and I think the bottom crop is too tight. Mattbuck 17:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)  Done (Perspective correction) --Billy69150 20:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support the last version Poco a poco 19:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 15:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC) I don't understand Mattbuck's criticism.
•  Support--Hubertl 22:35, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Chafariz_da_Rua_Escura,_Oporto,_Portugal,_2012-05-09,_DD_01.JPG

• Nomination Chafariz da Rua Escura, Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion Overexposed sky. --Mattbuck 22:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
   New version maybe, but very correctible and IMHO not relevant Poco a poco 19:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  No feedback, please, let me move it to CR. I think it meets QI --Poco a poco 18:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support it OK for QI.--Hubertl 05:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks too dark and blueish. Regards, Yann 09:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not really sure, but just uploaded a new version (brigther and warmer) Poco a poco 22:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support QI for me --Rjcastillo 13:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (166).jpg

• Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation. – A ÖBB-Railjet passes the station. --Steindy 00:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose I disagree. CA everywhere. But, stop, may be all new copper pylons? Jetzt weiß ich auch nicht. --Smial 10:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Yes Smail, you're absolutely right. These are not new catenary mooring, therefore, are also CAs to see; The photos and description of the image are only randomly labeled „total reconstruction“ of the station. You know, the ÖBB are so stupid and backward to the old catenary system down cut at a total reconstruction of a railway station in a meter lengths to then stitch it back together and hang again. In a contact wire cross-section of 120 mm2 one is quite simple. And as the contact wire rope depends on the support, this course must also have the appropriate section. So it is important to have no idea, but still give its „qualified comment“. For this to be able to read as many users, I do not put the photo on Withdrawn so that others can delight in it. That's what happens when you want another user to bash. --Steindy 23:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Kleine Englisch-Nachhilfe: Du meintest „when you want to bash another user“. Das, was du geschrieben hast, heißt auf Deutsch „wenn du willst, daß ein anderer User [wen auch immer] basht“.
•  Oppose CA everywhere, even the insulators are green on one side and purple on the other. And I think the ÖBB are wise enough not to use insulators made of copper. --Kreuzschnabel 19:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry Kreuzschnabel, dass ich nicht so perfekt Englich kann wie du. Bei mir ist es immerhin schon mehr als 45 Jahre her, dass ich Englischunterricht hatte. And yes, you did also correctly detect: "ÖBB are wise enough not to use insulators made of copper". They are made of brown porcelain, but the switches are also made of copper. --Steindy 02:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
    • So, the CA on the insulators can hardly be explained the usual way. --Kreuzschnabel 11:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
    • Das mit dem Englisch war kein Angriff, das war ein freundlich gemeinter Hinweis, du brauchst dich nicht gleich zu verteidigen und dich schon gar nicht bei mir zu entschuldigen. Ich entschuldige mich meinerseits dafür, dich auf einen Punkt hingewiesen zu haben, an dem man dich mißverstehen könnte. Soll nicht wieder vorkommen. --Kreuzschnabel 12:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
• Deutsch: Zur Kenntnis: Ich werde an meinen Fotos gar nichts, aber überhaupt nichts mehr ändern! Ihr könnt diese Diskussion sofort schließen. Ich habe eingesehen, dass - egal ob Porträts, Fußball-, Eisenbahn- oder Denkmalfotos - ich nur beschissenen Pixelmüll produziere, die den geforderten Standards nicht stand halten. Ich werde euch deshalb mit meinen unscharfen, verwischten, CA verseuchten, farb rauschigen Fotos nicht mehr auf QI belöästigen. Ich habe meine Lektion gelernt und ich bin diese Diskussionen, die nur darauf abzielen, die Arbeit von Fotografen schlecht zu machen, einfach müde und ich lasse mich auch nicht fertig machen. Ich werde daher hier nur mehr als (manchmal auch strenger) Kritiker in auftreten, so wie ich es von manchen anderen Benutzern gelernt habe.

English: Note: I will do nothing, but nothing at all to change in my photos! You can immediately conclude this discussion. I've seen that - whether portrait-, football-, rail- or monument-photos - I just shitty pixel garbage produce that was not the required standards maintained. I will therefore no longer belöästigen with my blurred, blurring, CA-polluted, noisy, cromatic noisy photos on QI. I've learned my lesson and I am these discussions, the only aim to make the work of photographers bad, just tired and I will not even get ready. I will therefore occur only over (sometimes severe) critics, as I have learned it from some other users.

Regards --Steindy 22:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

PS:Special thanks to Smial and Kreuzschnabel (hoffentlcih habe ich wenigstens dies in verständlichem Englisch geschrieben)

File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (160).jpg

• Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation. – Removal of the old platform 3/4. --Steindy 00:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  Noticable CA, lacking sharpness. --Mattbuck 00:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Withdrawn! Thank you for rating Mattbuck. Of course you are right. No desire for discussions. --Steindy 02:02, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Mattbuck does not know despite his many railway photos also evident that new catenary systems are made of copper and copper is known to be reddish. --Steindy 00:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
   Oppose There is a lots of magenta & green CA on the left side of the image (see the notes). Also the image is tilted to the right and needs a perspective correction. All these flaws can be fixed. --Halavar 01:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
   Oppose until CAs is fixed --Christian Ferrer 08:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Deutsch: Zur Kenntnis: Ich werde an meinen Fotos gar nichts, aber überhaupt nichts mehr ändern! Ihr könnt diese Diskussion sofort schließen. Ich habe eingesehen, dass - egal ob Porträts, Fußball-, Eisenbahn- oder Denkmalfotos - ich nur beschissenen Pixelmüll produziere, die den geforderten Standards nicht stand halten. Ich werde euch deshalb mit meinen unscharfen, verwischten, CA verseuchten, farb rauschigen Fotos nicht mehr auf QI belöästigen. Ich habe meine Lektion gelernt und ich bin diese Diskussionen, die nur darauf abzielen, die Arbeit von Fotografen schlecht zu machen, einfach müde und ich lasse mich auch nicht fertig machen. Ich werde daher hier nur mehr als (manchmal auch strenger) Kritiker in auftreten, so wie ich es von manchen anderen Benutzern gelernt habe.

English: Note: I will do nothing, but nothing at all to change in my photos! You can immediately conclude this discussion. I've seen that - whether portrait-, football-, rail- or monument-photos - I just shitty pixel garbage produce that was not the required standards maintained. I will therefore no longer belöästigen with my blurred, blurring, CA-polluted, noisy, cromatic noisy photos on QI. I've learned my lesson and I am these discussions, the only aim to make the work of photographers bad, just tired and I will not even get ready. I will therefore occur only over (sometimes severe) critics, as I have learned it from some other users.

Regards --Steindy 22:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen station (155).jpg

• Nomination Total reconstruction of Neunkirchen railwaystation. – The new switching scaffold for the catenary system. --Steindy 00:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
  Noticable CA top right. --Mattbuck 00:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Withdrawn! Thank you for rating Mattbuck. Of course you are right. No desire for discussions. --Steindy 02:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Mattbuck does not know despite his many railway photos also evident that catenary systems are made of copper and copper is known to be reddish. --Steindy 00:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
   Oppose On the top left there is a magenta CA. I left a note. That can be fixed. --Halavar 00:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
   Oppose until CAs is fixed --Christian Ferrer 08:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
• Deutsch: Zur Kenntnis: Ich werde an meinen Fotos gar nichts, aber überhaupt nichts mehr ändern! Ihr könnt diese Diskussion sofort schließen. Ich habe eingesehen, dass - egal ob Porträts, Fußball-, Eisenbahn- oder Denkmalfotos - ich nur beschissenen Pixelmüll produziere, die den geforderten Standards nicht stand halten. Ich werde euch deshalb mit meinen unscharfen, verwischten, CA verseuchten, farb rauschigen Fotos nicht mehr auf QI belöästigen. Ich habe meine Lektion gelernt und ich bin diese Diskussionen, die nur darauf abzielen, die Arbeit von Fotografen schlecht zu machen, einfach müde und ich lasse mich auch nicht fertig machen. Ich werde daher hier nur mehr als (manchmal auch strenger) Kritiker in auftreten, so wie ich es von manchen anderen Benutzern gelernt habe.

English: Note: I will do nothing, but nothing at all to change in my photos! You can immediately conclude this discussion. I've seen that - whether portrait-, football-, rail- or monument-photos - I just shitty pixel garbage produce that was not the required standards maintained. I will therefore no longer belöästigen with my blurred, blurring, CA-polluted, noisy, cromatic noisy photos on QI. I've learned my lesson and I am these discussions, the only aim to make the work of photographers bad, just tired and I will not even get ready. I will therefore occur only over (sometimes severe) critics, as I have learned it from some other users.

Regards --Steindy 22:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

File:ExCeL Centre MMB 26 Thameslink Desiro City Mockup.jpg

• Nomination Thameslink "Desiro City" mockup. Mattbuck 07:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion The left is side leaning. --Steindy 02:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  It's a reflection in a non-vertical window - of course it's going to be leaning. --Mattbuck 19:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) After a look at the category see note --Christian Ferrer 20:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  No, they lean in a bit. I took the perspective correction from the right hand side - interior furnishings are more likely to be vertical. Mattbuck 23:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:35, 3 February 2015 (UTC)