Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 01 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Nizzepark, Ribnitz-Damgarten --MB-one 20:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW X4 M40i at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 20:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The depth of field is too shallow. The front side of the car is fine, but the backside looks too blurry. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 21:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head and torso of the Vatican Laocoon in Louvre --Commonists 18:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 20:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bubo virginianus - Great horned owl Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 16:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Weird look on that owl's face, but image quality is pretty good! --Etaped 16:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portugal, Óbidos, Rua de Dom Antão Moniz --Berthold Werner 11:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 6 place du blé in La Canourgue, Lozère, France. --Tournasol7 08:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 10:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Foggy day in commune of Saint-Bonnet-de-Chirac (view from Truc de Saint-Bonnet-de-Chirac), Lozère, France. --Tournasol7 08:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Martin church in La Capelle, Lozère, France. --Tournasol7 08:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady church in Marvejols, Lozere, France. --Tournasol7 08:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination egg of cockatoo - Oeuf de Cacatoès --Ercé 08:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Commonists 18:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Andes, Limatambo, Cuzco, Peru --Poco a poco 07:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Commonists 18:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Municipal theater, Lima, Peru --Poco a poco 07:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harmandir Sahib or the Golden Temple, Amritsar, India --Poco a poco 07:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wojciech Chmielewski. By User:Sandro Halank --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inārs Kivlenieks. By User:Stepro --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jakub Kowalewski. By User:Sandro Halank --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mateusz Sochowicz. By User:Sandro Halank --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mystic Whaler (ship 1967) on the Hudson River --Ermell 07:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway bridge over the Regnitz in Pettstadt --Ermell 07:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agora und Museo de las Ciencias Príncipe Felipe in der Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias in Valencia --Ermell 07:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Piptoporus betulinus on a dead birch. Focus stack of 26 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Piptoporus betulinus on a dead birch. Focus stack of 26 photos.
-
- Nomination Farm road at Mühlenbach in the hamlet in Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Possible FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 21:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poster indicativo Miramar es familia siempre in Miramar, provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 22:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline F-value (7,1) is too high in this composition. Focus goes to Miramar and not to the background. Btw, lower contrast would also have been better --Michielverbeek 06:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC) --Michielverbeek 06:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Logo of Miramar City, Buenos Aires provine, Argentina --Ezarate 22:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, thanks! --LexKurochkin 07:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church at the Lake Bled --A,Ocram 16:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The lake view is beautiful, but digital processing artefacts are visible at full resolution, possibly JPEG compression is too high. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 11:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Zella-Mehlis. --Palauenc05 16:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Signature of 3-star chef Paul Bocuse. --Palauenc05 16:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Raspberry Pi Pico --Laserlicht 23:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, but IMHO photos of this kind should be done at basic ISO settings and with a tripod. You can get much much better quality from this camera (I have got the same). --Aristeas 07:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Fish in ice at supermarket -- MartinMichlmayr 04:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Description and categorization must be better, sharpness should be improved, white should be brighter. --XRay 04:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, (Chinese hibiscus) in Mar del Plata, Argentina --Ezarate 23:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Provincial Route 11 at Miramar, Argentina --Ezarate 23:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Provincial Route 11 at Miramar, Argentina --Ezarate 23:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Provincial Route 11 at Miramar, Argentina --Ezarate 23:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Provincial Route 11 at Miramar, Argentina --Ezarate 23:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View of Reindersmeer in Nationaal Park De Maasduinen (Well, Bergen, NL) --Trougnouf 21:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ghost sign on the left return in Queensway of a former Irwin's grocery shop on Seaview Road, Wallasey. --Rodhullandemu 20:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Airview of Sampas, Crete. --C messier 19:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Riad with pavillion in Dar Si Said Museum, Marrakesh. --C messier 19:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Casablanca, IMCAMA Building. --C messier 19:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Comet C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) on July 17, 2020. --C messier 19:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Spheres of different sizes in a row. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Little shapes on the surface of the Mandelbox. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A tiny (1 cm long) trilobites (Elrathia kingii), Wheeler Shale, Utah, United States --Poco a poco 17:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bohdan Nikishyn. By User:Jastrow --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Photo of UP Diliman Oblation Plaza. By User:Annab 99 --Pandakekok9 10:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Review It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 10:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Confluence_of_Katun_and_Chuya_rivers.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Confluence of Katun and Chuya rivers at Altay Mountains, Russia --KpokeJlJla 18:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Nice picture! Somehow it lacks sharpness in the details. But the shadow on the upper third makes it quite interesting! --Etaped 19:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support I think this is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! Increased clarity a little bit. --KpokeJlJla 06:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Kritzolina 14:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 02:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Frozen_trees_near_Chike-Taman_Pass.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Frozen trees near Chike-Taman Pass, Altay Mountains, Russia --KpokeJlJla 18:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- In my opinion it lacks sharpness in the details. Please object, if I'm mistaken. --Etaped 19:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! I tried to fix it, could you please check? --KpokeJlJla 06:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. --Junior Jumper 11:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Kritzolina 14:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Fairly mild posterization in the sky but otherwise solidly good. -- Ikan Kekek 21:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 02:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Επισκοπή_Ηρακλείου_0297.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Airview of Episkopi, Crete. --C messier 19:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Good overall quality, but I'm not sure about the sharpness. Please discuss. --Etaped 19:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- OK, so let’s move this to consensual review … --Aristeas 10:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support – a bit soft, but IMHO still OK (have seen much worse things in drone photos), and colours etc. are fine. --Aristeas 10:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Solid, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 05:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support per others. --Smial 15:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Ok, thanks for your opinions! --Etaped 16:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André Leclercq 16:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 02:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Autonomes_E-Shuttle_in_Hofer_Altstadt_20201126_DSC6581.jpg[edit]
- Nomination An autonomous E-shuttle in the old town of Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree bc the perspective is somewhat off. House edges seem straigt, but the subjects seems to be leaning to the right. Maybe its the form of the subject itself --Etaped 19:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support I could easily be missing something, but it looks to me like we're looking at an actual slope down to the left, and the people on the right look straight. -- Ikan Kekek 18:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 16:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André Leclercq 16:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 02:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Autonomes_E-Shuttle_in_Hofer_Altstadt_20201126_DSC6575.jpg[edit]
- Nomination An autonomous E-shuttle in the old town of Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose IG is good! But I disagree, I think perspective/composition could be better. The bench in fg distracts a bit. --Etaped 19:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support Acceptable. I try to make some allowances for taste, so the bench is nowhere near a deal-breaker for me, and I'm unconvinced it's even bad. -- Ikan Kekek 18:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support If depth of field were a problem, I would agree that a straight-on shot would be better, but it is IMO sharp enough for QI. Rhododendrites 19:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The image would have a stronger focus on the E-Bus if it was cropped tighter (same ratio) to remove the bench. --GRDN711 16:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André Leclercq 16:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --A.Savin 02:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Bamberg_klein_Venedig-20070825-RM-194758.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Fisherman houses little Venice in Bamberg during the Sandkerwa 2007 --Ermell 08:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Nice motif and perspective, but unfortunatly noise reduction introduces fragments and structures, e.g. in the clouds. --Etaped 19:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
I disagree. --Ermell 22:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC) - Oppose Sorry, I must agree Etaped. Lots of artifacts, not only in the clouds. The image is overall overprocessed --Smial 13:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Artefacts in the sky.--Peulle 12:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with the others, but I feel like the stuff in the sky should be fixable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
- Comment The criticism is entirely justified. Unfortunately, the technical standard in 2007 was not as far as it is today. I will revise the image again at a later date. Thanks for all the reviews.--Ermell 07:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --C messier 13:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)