Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 31 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Cynffon_Sidan_Bombycilla_garrulus.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination One of 40 Bombycilla garrulus eating berries on the hawthorn; Wales. By User:Alun Williams333 --Llywelyn2000 17:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Temporary  Oppose - I feel like the quality of this picture is not too far on the promote side of sharpness, but that's OK. However, in this photo, too, I think you should include the category for the hawthorn tree before it is promoted. -- Ikan Kekek 01:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment "Birds" as a category is really no good idea... --Basotxerri 16:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree and will remove that category. -- Ikan Kekek 23:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now - please add English description, location. --A.Savin 14:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support The bird looks just good enough for QI, methinks. @A.Savin: English description is wanted, but not required, that's only for the categories. @Ikan Kekek: I don't think the Hawthorn should be added as category, because I don't think the plant should be considered the subject of the image since it's very poorly rendered.--Peulle (talk) 10:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment - But at least some of the berries are clear. This is a photograph of a bird eating hawthorne berries. So I don't see how it makes any sense not to include the category.
  •  Support --Alchemist-hp 12:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Question - So that's it? 3 of you think it's OK to omit hawthorn as a category and will promote the photo? I guess if I want that category added, I have to find the Latin name for the plant and add it myself, eh? -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I searched for, found and added the category for the hawthorn tree, since there doesn't seem to be a separate category for the berries. I'm a little disgusted by what happened here. Go ahead and promote the photo now, but I think it's quite bad to reward a lack of responsiveness by the photographer or nominator. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Actually, there is a subcategory, Category:Crataegus monogyna (fruit), which I now linked to instead. -- Ikan Kekek 08:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 17:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)