Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 24 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Peste_et_procession_à_la_chapelle_Saint-Roch.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plague and procession at the Saint-Roch chapel in en:La Tour-en-Jarez, France. --Touam 09:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too many artefacts and very noisy. Sorry. --Ermell 15:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek 09:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Ermell. --August Geyler (talk) 13:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 12:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Nikon_Z_6II_13.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Nikon Z 6II body, right side view. (By User:Thilo Parg) --Augustgeyler 23:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry: insufficient DoF --F. Riedelio 17:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I am unsure if F. Riedelio is right in that case. The subject is "right side" of that camera. This is all in focus... --Augustgeyler 04:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support August, have the courage of your convictions. This is an unquestionably high-quality photo of the right side of that camera, and there's nothing whatsoever wrong with the focus fading toward the background. -- Ikan Kekek 10:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Commonists 11:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Oriental_Darter_Kabini_Nagarhole_India_Dec21_D72_21550.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Oriental darter (Anhinga melanogaster) on fallen bamboo in Kabini Reservoir, Nagarhole Nat'l Park --Tagooty 04:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I think the head is not sharp enough. Let's see what others think. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan. --A.Savin 14:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry per others --Commonists 11:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others --Jakubhal 16:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_peeing_activity_of_Zizula_hylax_(Fabricius,_1775)_–_Tiny_Grass_Blue.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing peeing activity of Zizula hylax (Fabricius, 1775) – Tiny Grass Blue.jpg (by Aniruddha97350) --Atudu 15:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Parsa 2au 06:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The butterfly is quite noisy, level of details is low. --Jakubhal 07:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jakubhal. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --A.Savin 14:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is a remarkably clear shot of the drop of pee at the back of the butterfly. IMO the soft focus on the head is excusable. @Aniruddha97350: To focus attention on the drop of pee, I suggest to crop the left half of the image and modify the Summary/Description accordingly. I'll support it. --Tagooty 06:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --August Geyler (talk) 12:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Twa_dancers.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Twa dancers in Rwnada (by Ludovic Hirlimann) --Adoscam 14:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unfortunate left and right crop, two dancers cut in half on the edges --Jakubhal 20:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I think that's a little bit harsh. It's difficult not to cut somebody in a group of running people. --Imehling 13:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with the opposer. Tricky but not impossible... Alvesgaspar 21:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfavorable image composition (too much foreground, cut off persons). --F. Riedelio 07:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Track_Belt_Wheel_Set_1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Track Belt Wheel Set small hobby Robotics Application. --Suyash.dwivedi 18:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support This resolution isn't very high, but I think it's fine for 2012 and considering the fairly low-end equipment used. --Peulle 09:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. 2 Mpixels from a 10-Mpixels camera, and sharpness is only average. --Smial 17:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree -- Alvesgaspar 21:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction is needed, image size too small (< 4 Mpx). --F. Riedelio 07:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Pistoia_-_Piazza_del_Duomo_-_Palazzo_dei_Comune.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pistoia / Toscana - Piazza del Duomo - Palazzo del Comune --Imehling 20:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I think this is not sharp enough (although borderline). --Domob 13:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Please give me a break. The picture has almost 20 Mpx. --Imehling 14:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Certainly sharp enough per nominator's remarks above and without prejudice to whether there might be any tilt and whether that exists in real life or not (I would defer to someone better able to judge that). -- Ikan Kekek 10:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO enough sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 16:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose burnt sky. --Smial 12:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose That burnt white cloud is really distracting. Easy to repeat and do better. Alvesgaspar 21:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as per Alvesgaspar. --Christian Ferrer 21:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective distortion, disturbing cloud. --F. Riedelio 07:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)