Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 24 2019

• 
  • Nomination Beech grove and playground at the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East bay on the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Promenadenbad on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade #24, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Benches at Landspitz on the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autumnal peninsula promenade with gazebo, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Aldred building, Montreal. --The Cosmonaut 03:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Royal Bank Tower, Montreal. --The Cosmonaut 03:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pinchgut Stream, Mount Thomas Forest Conservation Area --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pinchgut Stream, Mount Thomas Forest Conservation Area --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Okuku River, Mount Thomas Forest Conservation Area --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Okuku River, Mount Thomas Forest Conservation Area --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination McKay Stream, Black Range, New Zealand --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common leopard (Phalanta Phalantha) Lumbini --Charlesjsharp 01:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Virgin Mary, Santisimo Sacramento church, Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 22:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I would prefer a narrower crop without the annoying stripes on the left and right. -- Spurzem 00:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carpathian Mountains. By User:Nata Mostova --Anntinomy 18:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buzkiy Gard National Nature Park. By User:Vitalii Demus --Anntinomy 18:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion I really like this one. If there's a larger version, it would have a much better chance at COM:FPC, though. Please upload a larger version if you have one. -- Ikan Kekek 19:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Kadett B Coupe 1971 --Berthold Werner 14:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A decorated door in Hof, Bavaria, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ezarate 16:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination GE Passport engine displayed at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 13:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Solothurn, Switzerland: Biel gate, build in the 13th century. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but the top crop is a little bit tight. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window in Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek 11:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Sintra from Palácio Nacional, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --PantheraLeo1359531 12:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sculptures in Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --Michielverbeek 11:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of Palácio Nacional da Pena, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 18:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination German Museum of Technology, Berlin: Windmill "Foline" moved from East Frisia --JoachimKohler-HB 10:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination North American F-86K "Sabre" at Bundeswehr Museum of Military History – Berlin-Gatow Airfield --JoachimKohler-HB 10:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GRDN711 21:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921). --Palauenc05 09:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 75 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Lüneburg (1921). --Palauenc05 09:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 11:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acrobatic Gymnastics at the 2018 Summer Youth Olympics – Victory ceremony. By User:Sandro Halank --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 11:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ÖBV Vier-Nationen-Turnier 2016/Slovenia vs Poland. By User:Ailura --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ÖBV Vier-Nationen-Turnier 2016/Slovenia vs Poland. By User:Ailura --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ÖBV Vier-Nationen-Turnier 2016/Slovenia vs Poland. By User:Ailura --Andrew J.Kurbiko 09:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eggs of - Oeufs de Buse variable des Açores --Ercé 07:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Heuchelheim near Schlüsselfeld --Ermell 07:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Steam train on the railway bridge over the Main River in Hallstadt near Bamberg --Ermell 07:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to Haag (Wiesenttal) near Muggendorf in the Franconian Switzerland. The road crosses first the Wiesent and then the railway line Ebermannstadt-Behringersmühle. --Ermell 07:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inland cargo vessel Tokaj 3 on the Main-Danube Canal near Bamberg Direction Danube. --Ermell 07:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 11:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View to Haag (Wiesenttal) near Muggendorf in the Franconian Switzerland. The road crosses first the Wiesent and then the railway line Ebermannstadt-Behringersmühle. --Ermell 07:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour in the vicinity of mountain village S-charl. View of the mountains above S-charl.
    --Famberhorst 06:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Abyss above River Brancla.
    --Famberhorst 06:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra to Ramosch. "Larix decidua" above the mountain path.
    --Famberhorst 06:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a New Caledonian land snail, Placostylus porphyrostomus --Llez 05:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Dyeing dart frog, Dendrobates tinctorius, Karlsruhe Zoo --Llez 05:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Dyeing dart frog, Dendrobates tinctorius, Karlsruhe Zoo --Llez 05:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Detail of the attachment of the suspension bridge between Val Sinestra and Zuort.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Vnà to Zuort. Wooden Bridge above Brancla river.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Val Sinestra via Zuort to Griosch. View of the mountains around Griosch.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cape Otway Lighthouse, Cape Otway, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cape Otway Cemetery, Cape Otway, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taj Mahal, Agra, India --Poco a poco 12:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sky is a bit noisy (probably air pollution, but perhaps it could be smoothed out a bit, anyway?), file is certainly large enough for QI but not as large as I'd normally expect from this kind of picture in 2019. This is not an opposing vote; I'd just like a bigger version if you have it (I suspect you don't) and somewhat less noise. -- Ikan Kekek 18:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
    This image is 10 years old, the camera I had back then had only 10 MPx, which I offer here. I've uploaded a new version with some sky denoising. --Poco a poco 13:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support - I guess the date didn't register with me. Thanks for denoising. -- Ikan Kekek 19:46, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trou de Bozouls, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 08:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour of Guarda, Switzerland via Ardez and Ftan to Scuol house in Guarda.
    --Famberhorst 06:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The noise should be reduced more IMO --Ermell 07:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done. Noise Reduction Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst 17:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Prasüras, through the Val Trupchun to Alp Purcher in the Swiss National Park. Jeep from park ranger.
    --Famberhorst 06:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The categorization for the car should be more precise --Ermell 07:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Done. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst 17:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Håkonshallen, Bergen, Norway --Poco a poco 23:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Some CA at the top of the building. Could be a bit sharper there as well IMO. --Ermell 14:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 12:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A former girl's school in Hof, Bavaria, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Very nice image and it's nearly QI, but if you can slightly improve the perspective correction. --Tournasol7 14:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review, I hope it is better now :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
    Also dust spots to remove. --Steindy 20:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done Dust spots removed. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Varoš Monastery, Prilep, Macedonia --Pudelek 09:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 14:21, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Björn Fecker im Rahmen des WLP Projektes in der Bremischen Bürgerschaft von User:Foto-AG Melle --Olaf Kosinsky 21:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review Unfavorable cut with a wide chest and tiny head. You should try to cut it more tight. -- Spurzem 22:16, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
    Lens flare in the right lens. --Steindy 00:30, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Independence March 2011. By User:CLI --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Independence March 2011. By User:CLI --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Independence March 2011. By User:CLI --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Independence March 2011. By User:CLI --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Brotherly Love Procession on Maundy Thursday, Holy Week in Calatayud, Spain. --Poco a poco 09:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Gate of San Miguel, Plaza del Olivo, Calatayud, Spain --Poco a poco 09:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Expo 2008, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 09:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Some CA at the right side should be removed. --Ermell 20:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 13:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Car park of Melba Gully State Park, Victoria, Australia --XRay 04:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Basaltic Prisms, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, Mexico --Poco a poco 07:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, I think the top of the columns is too unsharp. Nice basaltic columns, though! --Domob 17:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Unterhohenried --Ermell 07:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    many CA on the leaves in the upper left. Fixable --George Chernilevsky 09:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 08:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
    Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 11:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:China_National_Convention_Center_Beijing_1.jpg

• Nomination China National Convention Center --Arne mueseler 05:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Chenspec 18:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. The picture is rather unsharp. It should have been taken with higher f-number for more depth of field in my view (f/4,5 and exposure time 1/800 sec make no sense). --Imehling 09:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Agreed, not sharp enough. Also, this leaning is problematic, because since one of the sides appears to curve, it's not clear what the building really looks like. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Even at f/4.5 there should be a sharp area somewhere, but there isn't. From that camera location it should also be possible to take an image with no or at least fare less perspective issues. -- Smial 19:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, it looks as if this picture is taken from a driving car. --Imehling 13:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_parroquial,_Geiranger,_Noruega,_2019-09-07,_DD_83.jpg

• Nomination Church of Geiranger, Norway --Poco a poco 08:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion I see magenta CA on the near edges of some of the tombstones on the right. -- Ikan Kekek 10:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:10, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
  Steindy, why are you in such a rush to promote, before Poco has seen my remark about the chromatic abberation? You are wasting people's time, because now, I have to move it to CR, whereas if you had let this process play out, I would have promoted the file as soon as the CA was removed.  Oppose for now. -- Ikan Kekek 13:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
  Ikan, I am not in a rugh. Is it possible for you that our reviews overlap? --Steindy 22:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
   Question - Are you suggesting that although you tried to promote this photo at the timestamp of 11:10, 17 December 2019, you didn't see my remarks, timestamped 10:07, 17 December 2019, before you did that? -- Ikan Kekek 23:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I've removed the CA. Regarding the ongoing discussion, Ikan Kekek, I see this kind of issues often and always assume good faith as the page could be opened for a while, nothing wild. In cases like this I do choose "comment" so that I prevent from moving to CR, Poco a poco 13:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks, Poco. I see the point in your remarks. I guess I'm a bit sensitive because of the other guy who summarily overrules everyone without arguments. -- Ikan Kekek 18:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 21:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_baubles_and_sparkler_(01).jpg

• Nomination Christmas baubles and sparkler. Merry Christmas! --Steindy 00:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Insufficient quality. --Smial 00:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  Keine konkrete Begründung anzugeben, was an dem Foto nicht passt, spricht Bände. Gratulation! --Steindy 01:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Insufficient quality. Steidy, please wasting our time with your nominations like these --Podzemnik 03:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_baubles_and_sparkler_(02).jpg

• Nomination Christmas baubles and sparkler. Merry Christmas! --Steindy 00:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Insufficient quality. --Smial 00:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  Keine konkrete Begründung anzugeben, was an dem Foto nicht passt, spricht Bände. Gratulation! --Steindy 01:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 03:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_baubles_and_sparkler_(03).jpg

• Nomination Christmas baubles and sparkler. Merry Christmas! --Steindy 00:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Insufficient quality. --Smial 00:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  Keine konkrete Begründung anzugeben, was an dem Foto nicht passt, spricht Bände. Gratulation! --Steindy 01:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 03:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_baubles_and_sparkler_(04).jpg

• Nomination Christmas baubles and sparkler. Merry Christmas! --Steindy 00:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Nowhere near sharp enough. Where's the EXIF to judge whether the exposure is correct? Rodhullandemu 00:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  Thank you for your vote! My photos are at least as sharp as your photos. --Steindy 01:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 03:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_decoration_in_Fischapark_Wiener_Neustadt_(06).jpg

• Nomination Christmas decoration in the shoppingcenter "Fischapark" in Wiener Neustadt (Austria). Merry Christmas! --Steindy 00:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Not sharp enough where it actually matters. Rodhullandemu 00:12, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
  Thank you for your vote! My photos are at least as sharp as your photos. --Steindy 01:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 03:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:19-12-16-Altstaedter-Ring-RalfR2.jpg

• Nomination Weihnachtsmarkt auf dem Altstädter Ring --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Per guidelines: without sufficient categories and descriptions, no QI. --A.Savin 15:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Yes, description and cats are insufficient, but we should give the author the time to correct the issue before declining --PantheraLeo1359531 15:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Super Idee und schönes Bild anläßlich Weihnachten, Ralf! Als ob wir A.Savin nicht kennen würden. . --Steindy 19:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support So ist es: Selten eine derart rauscharme Nachtaufnahme gesehen. Gilt auch für die beiden anderen Bilder. --Jacek79 21:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support--Imehling 09:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Good composition and good quality regarding the lighting conditions. But no good description. I now know, that "Altstadter Ring" is located somewhere in Prague. That needed clicking through two or three category branches to find this. For now  Oppose until some meaningful description is added, sorry. --Smial 09:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:19-12-16-Altstaedter-Ring-RalfR1.jpg

• Nomination Weihnachtsmarkt auf dem Altstädter Ring --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Per guidelines: without sufficient categories and descriptions, no QI. --A.Savin 15:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Yes, description and cats are insufficient, but we should give the author the time to correct the issue before declining --PantheraLeo1359531 15:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Super Idee und schönes Bild anläßlich Weihnachten, Ralf! Als ob wir A.Savin nicht kennen würden. . --Steindy 19:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support--Imehling 09:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
• Good composition and good quality regarding the lighting conditions. But no good description. I now know, that "Altstadter Ring" is located somewhere in Prague. That needed clicking through two or three category branches to find this. For now  Oppose until some meaningful description is added, sorry. --Smial 09:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:19-12-16-Prag-Karlsbrücke-RalfR.jpg

• Nomination Karlsbrücke vor der Morgendämmerung - die abgesoffenen Schatten sind absichtig entwickelt, diese Flächen haben Zeichnung in der RAW --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 15:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC) Das muß ihnen doch Spaß bereiten? --Ralf Roletschek 15:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  I think the quality of the picture is good. It only lacks a proper categorization. --Imehling 16:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)  Comment If this picture was by a newbie, it certainly would have been declined, as its level of sharpness is obviously far below nowadays' QI standards. But I've no illusion of course, that some users and their friends are above all guidelines. --A.Savin 18:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Ralf Gratulation! Voll ins Schwarze getroffen . Als ob wir A.Savin nicht kennen würden. --Steindy 19:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Support Verstehe ich auch nicht, wo bei diesem Bild das Problem sein soll. Für die Lichtverhältnisse ist es scharf und hat wenig Rauschen. Schöne Weihnacht. --Imehling 08:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 09:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_decoration_in_Fischapark_Wiener_Neustadt_(03).jpg

• Nomination Christmas decoration in the shoppingcenter "Fischapark" in Wiener Neustadt (Austria). --Steindy 00:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Quality is good enough, but I recommend a tripod at night scenes with proper HDR settings. This could help to avoid declined images --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  I disagree Heavy chroma noise everywhere. --Smial 18:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von dieser Seite. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 19:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_decoration_in_Fischapark_Wiener_Neustadt_(04).jpg

• Nomination Christmas decoration in the shoppingcenter "Fischapark" in Wiener Neustadt (Austria). --Steindy 00:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Insufficient quality. Noise, leaning. Tripod recommended. --Smial 18:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von dieser Seite. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 19:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_decoration_in_Fischapark_Wiener_Neustadt_(07).jpg

• Nomination Christmas decoration in the shoppingcenter "Fischapark" in Wiener Neustadt (Austria). --Steindy 00:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 02:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von dieser Seite. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 19:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_decoration_in_Fischapark_Wiener_Neustadt_(09).jpg

• Nomination Christmas decoration in the shoppingcenter "Fischapark" in Wiener Neustadt (Austria). --Steindy 00:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  I disagree CA, noise, blown highlights, leaning. Nice snapshot, but by far no QI. --Smial 18:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von dieser Seite. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 19:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_decoration_in_Fischapark_Wiener_Neustadt_(10).jpg

• Nomination Christmas decoration in the shoppingcenter "Fischapark" in Wiener Neustadt (Austria). --Steindy 00:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
   Oppose Insufficient quality. Out of focus --Podzemnik 02:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Comment Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von dieser Seite. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 19:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose per Podzemnik. --A.Savin 20:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(01).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Beautiful and atmospheric but not the best quality -- Spurzem 00:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Too noisy sky, and unsharp. --A.Savin 00:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Macht es Spaß, werter A.Savin? Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von den Nominierungen. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 01:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nette Idee, aber missglückt. --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(05).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Beautiful image -- Spurzem 00:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Too noisy sky, and unsharp. --A.Savin 00:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC
  
•  Comment Macht es Spaß, werter A.Savin? Manche werden es NIE begreifen, dass ich mit diesen Nominierungen nichts anders, als etwas weihnachtliches in die staubtrockene Bude bringen wollte. Daher machen mir Kontras nichts aus, denn nach Weihnachten verschwinden die Bilder ohnehin von den Nominierungen. Frohe Weihnacht!!! --Steindy 01:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC))
•  Oppose - Very difficult light conditions for photography, but whereas the buildings are visible, the Christmas market can hardly be seen. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(06).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Close but insufficient quality to me --Podzemnik 01:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Oh. Sorry for rating another photo, and Merry Christmas! -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. --A.Savin 23:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(11).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(09).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose To me slightly better than the rest of the series, but nonetheless -- too noisy sky. --A.Savin 23:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(02).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. The kindergarten-like comments better to ignore. --A.Savin 14:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

 Comment I think it's better to ignore the high-minded comments of A.Savin. --Steindy 00:03, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(08).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry, but is too noisy and unsharp. --Tournasol7 00:33, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Tournasol7? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!!
•  Oppose per Tournasol. --A.Savin 14:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(10).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose I believe you need a tripod for night shots like these. Downsizing doesn't help to increase the quality --Podzemnik 01:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. --A.Savin 20:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(15).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Podzemnik 01:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Podzemnik. --A.Savin 20:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Christmas_market_in_Hartberg_(13).jpg

• Nomination Christmas in Hartberg (Styria). --Steindy 00:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Look like a phone picture --Podzemnik 01:45, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Is it fun, dear Podzemnik? Some will NEVER understand that with these nominations I wanted to bring something festive to the dust-dry booth. Therefore, I don't mind contras, because after Christmas the pictures disappear from the nominations anyway. Merry Christmas!!! --Steindy 01:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 11:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Flashed picture elements overexposed and without detail. Background underexposed. That's the way it is when you flash directly outdoors. --Smial 08:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Terrible flashlight. --A.Savin 23:16, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Smial 08:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)