Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 16 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:1_hallstatt_austria.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hallstatt austria unescoI. By User:Chensiyuan --Seven Pandas 02:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough, CAs --Uoaei1 06:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of spots all over the image. --Basotxerri 21:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose by Uoaei1 as well as Basotxerri --PtrQs 01:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. Daniel Case 05:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 14:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

File:South-West_from_Waterloo_Bridge_at_Night.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Long exposure panorama of the view South-West from Waterloo Bridge at Night.--Prosthetic Head 21:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Parts have a sligt tilt to the left I think. The very right part isn´t QI. I propose to cut it out. The motion blur of the ships isn´t ideal. --Milseburg 09:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The tilt should be managable, but like Milseburg I find the tree on the right disturbing. --PtrQs (talk) 00:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 14:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)