Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 12 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Close_Wing_Basking_of_Ariadne_merione_(Cramer,_1777)_-_Common_Castor_WLB_DSC_3946a.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close Wing Basking of Ariadne merione (Cramer, 1777) - Common Castor --TAPAN1412 02:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Imehling 10:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO too noisy, lack of detail. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Better than many other pictures of that series but still too noisy, too many NR artifacts, too little detail. --Plozessor 06:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Bamberg_GMS_Pontes_-20230607-RM-163813.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination GMS Pontes after leaving the Bamberg lock --Ermell 06:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think we should discuss this one. I'm not convinced this is a QI in 2023, given the fairly low resolution and somewhat lacking sharpness.--Peulle 08:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Peulle: New version uploaded. Thanks for your review.--Ermell 10:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. The bridge should be sharper. Why was the photo taken with such a wide open aperture? -- Spurzem 11:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
    • @Spurzem: Taken with my mobile phone :-) --Ermell 11:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This is obviously AI-upscaled or sharpened (probably by the phone software). If you look at the writings (023140, FRANKFURT AM MAIN, PONTES), the picture has little to do with reality. Compare with another picture of that same ship like found [here]. --Plozessor 16:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Plozessor. The photo looks quite good at first sight, but I strongly dislike what happened to the name of the ship. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 00:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Plozessor and Robert --Jakubhal 09:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

File:2009_in_der_Garfagnana_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Small hut close to Verni, Italy --Kritzolina 19:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree because of the composition. More then have of the image is empty blue sky. This is not eligible for QI in my eyes. --Milseburg 14:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Except for the hut, the whole picture is blurry with a lot of NR artifacts and low detail, the mountaintops are frayed. --Plozessor 07:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Keeping in mind that it's a 2009 shot, I still think the CA is an issue.--Peulle 09:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Not sharp enough -- Spurzem 11:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)~
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor --Jakubhal 09:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above --Sandro Halank 16:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Sandro Halank 16:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

File:D-4-71-174-22_Gasthaus_Grüner_Baum,_Toreinfahrt_mit_Durchgang,_1849,_Hauptstraße_4,_Rattelsdorf.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Historic gate of "Green Tree" inn in Rattelsdorf --Plozessor 06:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough, sorry. Alexander Novikov 18:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)}
  •  Oppose Definitely too soft.--Peulle 08:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Peulle, @Alexander Novikov Oops, I had accidentally uploaded a blurred version! Sorry, please review the new (actually old) version. Sorry! --Plozessor 08:50, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, it's fine now.--Peulle 15:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks very clean --PantheraLeo1359531 19:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks good. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 17:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)