Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 11 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Saint_Michael_Church_(Kalida,_Ohio)_-_nave,_rear.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Interior of an Ohio church --Nheyob 01:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, same as the other photographs. It's the best of the three nominations, but IMO not sharp enough. F/8 or closer and ISO 100 together with a tripod should help. --XRay 05:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice photo. Some issues like CA on top arch and a little bit dark on the bottom, but the composition is very good and sharp enough. Tripods are not always allowed in churches at least here in Italy.--Moroder 07:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me, beautiful image -- Spurzem 10:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me, too. --Palauenc05 11:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose It is a wonderful composition, but I am with Xray. Additionally, it is too noisy. --Augustgeyler (talk) 13:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Moroder. --Smial 15:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 17:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Pseudagrion_malabaricum_03177.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pseudagrion malabaricum --Vengolis 02:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too small if cropped to be useful --Charlesjsharp 22:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, QI for me. --Sandro Halank 21:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Smial 10:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The resolution is at minimum. But it is. --Augustgeyler 12:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Scotch Mist 14:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small after necessary cropped. Tournasol7 15:24, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Good image but too small if cropped. --Tagooty 09:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Above the limit if not cropped. --Palauenc05 11:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 14:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)