Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 11 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:London November 2013-21.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Street artist, London. -- Alvesgaspar 11:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Strange vertical JPEG artifacts on the pot and rope. --Mattbuck 00:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC).
  •  Info Thank you for noticing Mattbuck, I have no idea how those artifacts appeared. A new version was upoladed -- Alvesgaspar 14:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I don't think it's sharp/crisp enough. Mattbuck 23:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Rievaulx Abbey MMB 32.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rievaulx Abbey. Mattbuck 08:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose poor lighting, strange angle of view --A.Savin 18:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Brightened. Mattbuck 22:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
    Doesn't look better to me, the shadow is too dark, has detail loss, sorry --A.Savin 22:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
    I request discussion. Mattbuck 00:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Sharpness esp. in the corners is not perfect. Try to find the sweet spot of the lens, perhaps it's somewhat better at f/11. My k-x has sometimes problems with focussing wide angle shots and the AF runs behind "infinity", which also leads to overall unsharpness. You should check that. Lighting looks natural to me, contrast is very high but still acceptable.-- Smial 09:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per A.Savin --Archaeodontosaurus 07:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 17:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Unterfaller_in_Saubach_01.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Farmhouse "Unterfaller" in Saubach, Barbian --Moroder 15:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Overexposed --Poco a poco 21:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
    I disagree OE irrelevant --Moroder 10:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, colour channel clipping makes really odd colours in the sky. Yes, I know it's a difficult lighting situation because the main object is in the shadow, but this in addition looks somewhat dull. -- Smial 10:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 17:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Lojanguaegsel merelinnustiku loendusel.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ornitologist counting birds (by Matikose) Kruusamägi 23:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I like it! --XRay 20:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, but I think it's a bit too noisy (espacially the face) --P e z i 21:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
     Comment chromatic aberration, tilt and noise. Problems are very easy to fix. I could help?, Very very very nice picture --The Photographer 12:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Help would be greatly appreciated :) Kruusamägi 21:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Question What do you think? --The Photographer 02:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

  •  Support new version is OK. --P e z i 16:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 17:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ballet_Don_Quijote_en_Teatro_Teresa_Carreño_3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Ballet Don Quijote en Teatro Teresa Carreño --The Photographer 17:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Oppose really an amazing image; but for QI unfortunately it's too noisy IMO --P e z i 20:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
     SupportI disagree. No real noise problem regarding the conditions. Though 1/250s would have been better it's a great shot. --Smial 19:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 17:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:EmS_2013_Turbonegro_05.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Turbonegro playing at the "Eier mit Speck" festival in Viersen, germany, 2013. Image taken by Grywnn. --Smial 16:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The composition here is really bad I think, and the microphone is severly blurred. Mattbuck 20:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. It´s a concert photo. I think you are not aware of the concert photography. The composition is art. --Jean11 22:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
    I'm aware that composition doesn't have to be "subject central", but given the subject is barely even in the photo, I don't think the composition here is QI. Mattbuck 22:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support in my eyes very good composition. --Ralf Roletschek 15:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 17:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Olmsted_Point_Yosemite_August_2013_004.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Olmsted Point, Yosemite National Park. --King of Hearts 12:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Review I'm not sure - doesn't seem to me much fine detail on the left. Mattbuck 23:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
     SupportGood quality. --Moroder 21:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
    Sorry, I don't think I can support this.  Oppose. Mattbuck 20:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 17:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Flughafen_München_-_Gebäude_-_Andreas_Kuhnlein_005.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture 2 (out of three) of the arrangement "in flux" (2002) from the german sculptor Andreas Kuhnlein at the visitors park of the Munich Airport. He made his sculptures with a chain saw out of a piece from a tree. --Mummelgrummel 07:05, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not quite crisp, overexposed background. --Mattbuck 21:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
     Comment Hello Mattbuck - thank you for commenting. But I don`t know, what exactly you mean with "not quite crisp". And I also see no overexposed background. The technical problem is rather that it was a very cloudy day and so the background is nearly white. On the other hand there are the technical criterias to be assessed, not wether it is sunny or not I think. I hope, that there is a third opinion. --Mummelgrummel 12:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Done I have tried to fix the problem. Is this o.k. now? --Mummelgrummel 16:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
    The background is better, but the statue itself doesn't seem quite sharp to me. Mattbuck 22:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
    ✓ Done My last attempt. I have sharpened the picture (so i hope) and cropped it new. I hope, this version is right. --Mummelgrummel 16:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
    Hm, not quite sure. Weak  Support for me I think. Mattbuck 22:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 17:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Polanica_Zdrój,_park_zdrojowy,_24.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination: Polanica-Zdrój, Spring Park --Halicki 22:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose Overexposure, tilt on left. Mattbuck 21:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 17:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pelecanus_occidentalis_in_Mangroves.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Pelecanus occidentalis in Mangroves --The Photographer 14:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment I would never remove the branches. It isn't the real nature anymore. Even if the people see it differently. --Hockei 15:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
     Support Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 21:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp and overexposed. --Hockei 22:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 17:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)