Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 04 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Rayen_Castle_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rayen Castle, Iran --Bgag 04:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but imo too soft --A.Savin 05:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support - Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 15:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Transporte_por_cable_de_minerales,_Devnya,_Bulgaria,_2016-05-27,_DD_63.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mineral cable transport, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 18:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 18:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMHO tilt and agressive perspective distortion --The Photographer 19:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
  • I corrected the tilt. Regarding the perspective I don't think it is too agressive (32) and I see no big deformation here --Poco a poco 21:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not tilted now IMO. QI--Lmbuga 17:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 15:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Drammenselva ved Mjøndalen (1).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hill by the Drammen river near Mjøndalen. --Peulle 20:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice composition but a bit noisy --Moroder 12:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Applied a bit of noise reduction. Did that help?--Peulle 11:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The water is not much better than this but let decide also others. Put it on discuss --Moroder 15:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support - The water doesn't have to be clear - it's a reflection. This is a very nice atmospheric picture with a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek 03:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support - Per Ikan Kekek. --Haeferl 00:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok, QI, good composition and nice; but a bit of chromatic noise--Lmbuga 16:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 15:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)