Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 03 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Freiherr-vom-Stein-Haus (district government) on Domplatz in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arcades on Prinzipalmarkt in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colored pencils --XRay 04:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pier at the Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Edelweiss on Hauptstraße #108 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Edelweiß bath with gratis entrance on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Public jetty on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Promenade on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the stained glass window in the baptistry of St. Brendan's Cathedral, Loughrea, by Michael Healy (1873–1941), depicting Simeon holding Jesus Christ. --AFBorchert 19:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Radomianin 20:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guidobaldo da Montefeltro - Raphael.jpg --Commonists 19:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bratislava Castle, view from the western pedestrian and bicycle path at the SNP bridge --Jakubhal 18:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leo Bassi in the show "Me, Mussolini!" at 34. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 18:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Marble Quarry near Carrera / Toscana --Imehling 17:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Theseus saves Hippodameia by Johannes Pfuhl, Athens. --C messier 16:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Rotmilan im Kurpfalz-Park Wachenheim, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland. --Fischer.H 14:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Cooking game; learning of the little girl to play the role of the mother who cooks in Central African Republic (by Jerry Loick KONZI) --Adoscam 10:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Very interesting picture, but the face is out of focus. Focus in the foreground on fingers and partly on fire. --Jakubhal 18:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A group of artists performs in Karamoja in Making some fire (by fghibaudi) --Adoscam 10:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but: (1) I see only one artist in this photo, and (2) where do the water droplets come from and what is their role in the performance? -- Ikan Kekek 10:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Newhaven in Edinburgh with lighthouse --Ermell 10:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gravestone in front of the Catholic parish church Mariae Geburt in Pettstadt --Ermell 10:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of the Catholic parish church Mariae Geburt in Pettstadt --Ermell 10:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the river Regnitz and the mouth of the river Aurach near Pettstadt in the district of Bamberg --Ermell 10:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1595) in Wilsecker, Germany. --Palauenc05 09:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Arch bridge crossing the Ludwig Canal. By User:Derzno --XRay 05:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Lovely, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome of the Alte Nationalgalerie, Berlin, Germany. By User:T meltzer --XRay 05:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent quality --Michielverbeek 06:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Recollets church in Rouffach, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 05:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Albinus church in Prades, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Roquevidal, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Our Lady of the Assumption church in Algans, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 07:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Salvius church in St-Salvy, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hattem, War Memorial by Lajos Gyorfi.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Hattem, War Memorial by Lajos Gyorfi.
-
- Nomination Tomatos --XRay 04:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
clearly QI, but the background appears blobby. Charlesjsharp 11:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two canoeists on Maligne Lake (Canada). (By User:DEspel) --Augustgeyler 01:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Noise should be reduced. Why is the image mirrored? --Ermell 14:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Question Mirrored? Is it? --Augustgeyler 15:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Look at the writing on the left canoe. --AStiasny 15:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you, mentioning that. I did not see that before. --Augustgeyler 17:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A natural arrangement of bright yellow Ginkgo biloba leaves, all attached to the end of a twig. (By User:Franz van Duns) --Augustgeyler 01:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Blown highlights and strange fringes at the borders. --Ermell 14:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination --Augustgeyler 15:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination John Jacob Astor Hotel in Astoria, Oregon --Another Believer 01:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Poor framing, building is cropped. -- Alvesgaspar 11:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jodel Dossou, footballplayer of SC Austria Lustenau. --Steindy 00:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nicolas Mohr, footballplayer of SC Austria Lustenau. --Steindy 00:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Asian ladybeetle (Harmonia axyridis), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 14:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality - alive I hope! --Charlesjsharp 11:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An Ice Sculptor (Cavalcade of Lights 2021, Toronto, Canada)--Maksimsokolov 03:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality; classic b/w photo aesthetics, good framing, showing the concentrated working of the artist --Aristeas 09:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City hall of Rouffach, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 13:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination The restaurant Moshi Moshi, Rue du Molinel, in Lille, France --Velvet 07:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Looks too distorted. Did this hapen at processing or is it due to lens distortion? --Augustgeyler 20:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. Could you be a bit more specific about the distorsion you have noticed ? --Velvet 07:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC) Comment I came to that conclusion because the far right verticals are vertical. But the right edge of the main building is leaning out. Am I wrong? --Augustgeyler 10:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
I would gladly correct it, but I don't see where --Velvet 09:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
That is why I think it has to do with lens-distortion. You should fix that by appling a special lens correction, for example in Lightroom, or Darktable. --Augustgeyler 23:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't see a distortion. --Velvet 11:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC) Comment Ok, I will not decide. So let's wait for other reviewers. --Augustgeyler 15:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC) Support I think I see what August means, but IMHO the curvature is a feature of the building; a typical barrel distortion caused by the lens would be stronger at the border and not in the midframe. So IMHO the photo is good. --Aristeas 09:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mini Hatch Electric Strip Paul Smith at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 21:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Marghita train station, Romania --Cmelak770 14:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Left side it seems leaning in. --Tournasol7 16:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Comment I don't think so, the rain water downpipe is not perpendicular.--Cmelak770 21:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Camel is still the best way to move through history in egypt (by Adelbayoumi) --Adoscam 09:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops), Arrábida National Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 19:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Nice composition but too blurry and noisy -- Alvesgaspar 17:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 64-1363 SNTFC with an express train at Oradea Est Triaj station, Romania --Cmelak770 07:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Please remove the CA. --Ermell 09:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment I removed the CA, is it OK now? --Cmelak770 19:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
A the factory buildings at the left side is still a little left. --Ermell 17:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mausoleum of Kazi Nazrul Islam. (by USERNAME) --Mashkawat.ahsan 05:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The way the image is cropped destroys is. --Goran tek-en 15:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Stefanos Crater from Nikia. Nisyros, Greece --Ввласенко 11:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
IMHO, a bit too noisy, yellow and underexposed. Fixable. --C messier 20:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Done New handling -- Ввласенко 11:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC) Oppose There is some noise or out of focus all over which IMHO makes it not good enough. --Goran tek-en 15:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church tower of Pienza Cathedral, Italy --Lo Scaligero 10:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Comment The tower looks very distorted. Did this happen at processing? --Augustgeyler 14:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
The processing was minimal, I think it depends on the point of view :-/ --Lo Scaligero 07:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC) Comment In that case it might have something to do with lens distortion. Did you correct this? --Augustgeyler 03:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Yes, automatic correction on camera is set. Maybe is it a distortion due to the fact that the tower is located close to the corner of the picture? --~~~~ Comment If this is the case this correction was not working properly. --Augustgeyler 23:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC) Oppose To me the sharpness is not really anywhere. A lower ISO setting might have helped and working with the f-number. --Goran tek-en 15:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_Pig_Monument,_Bangkok_(October_2021)_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Hartelholz,_M%C3%BAnich,_Alemania,_2020-07-12,_DD_76-112_FS.jpg)
.jpg)
_Electric_Strip_Paul_Smith_IAA_2021_1X7A0053.jpg)
,_Parque_natural_de_la_Arr%C3%A1bida,_Portugal,_2020-07-31,_DD_25.jpg)
.jpg)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Avispa_(Psenulus_pallipes),_Hartelholz,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2020-08-08,_DD_72-89_FS.jpg[edit]
,_Hartelholz,_M%C3%BAnich,_Alemania,_2020-08-08,_DD_72-89_FS.jpg)
- Nomination Wasp (Psenulus pallipes), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 08:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too noisy and unsharp. Many parts are out of focus. --Hillopo2018 09:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Done I reduced the noise a bit, if you mean by out of focus the areas in the back, isn't that acceptable for this kind of shot? to get the whole wasp sharp I'd need something like 300 images focus stacked --Poco a poco 09:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose A dead animal, as shown by the antennae. Thus, not a faithful depiction of the wasp imo. Image quality in on the borderline considering it is a focus stack. -- Alvesgaspar 10:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What kind of reason is that to oppose? skies have to be blue, animals alive, cars red and guys ware a moustache? I cannot keep up writting down all new rules you introduce. Please, explain me how do you want to manage this kind of shot with 15 frames and this magnification if the animal is hoping around --Poco a poco 19:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What I realize is that our approach to QIC is very different, a difference that is reflected upon our assessments. I tend to nominate my best pictures (not the excellent, those are to FPC) aiming to get the recognition of the community and taking into consideration how they can be useful to the end-users. I make no allowances to the difficulty of the shots, the unfortunate conditions or the hard work involved. Those are my problems, not theirs. Neither am I pursuing any kind of record of QIs, a goal that is obviously detrimental to quality. Concerning the present image, the end-user won’t care if it was taken with expensive gear and using sophisticated techniques. In fact, it is possible to shoot much better photos of insects, both alive and dead, as eloquently demonstrated by our (former) colleague Richard Bartz. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → 
Declined --Augustgeyler 18:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Declined --Augustgeyler 18:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)File:Vista_de_Alcázar_del_Sal,_Portugal,_2021-09-12,_DD_69-78_PAN.jpg[edit]
- Nomination View of Alcácer do Sal, Portugal --Poco a poco 15:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Deceiving view caused by wrong choice of projection, river is straight at this spot -- Alvesgaspar 06:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment As already discussed in CR. No QI rule prohibits this kind of projection. Fine if you want to agree on new regulations, but please, don't make them up. --Poco a poco 20:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Info Yes there is, in the Editing section of Image guidelies: "manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable" -- Alvesgaspar 22:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)- Comment Poco, I'll support if you describe this as a cylindrical projection. Could you please always do that when you use one? Because it is an issue that otherwise, people who don't know this landscape would be likely to get the wrong idea. -- Ikan Kekek 06:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Question But why should the identification of the process, which is absolutely irrelevant for the end-user, justify the misrepresentation of the subject? -- Alvesgaspar 09:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It tells the viewer that the scene has been manipulated in a specific way. If you hate all cylindrical projections, fine, but to me, the point is to for the photographer to be open about what they did. -- Ikan Kekek 10:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Ikan Kekek, I don't hate cylindrical projections and they not always cause this type of distortion, it depends on the shape of the subject and the POV. What I mean (I have said this before) is that it doesn't matter what projection is used, provided the subject is not misrepresented (purposefully or not), thus deceiving the end-user about its real shape. Telling the end-user that some projection was used won't clarify him about the real shape of the subject. Of course, I'm referring here to documentary images, not artistic ones. Is my concern so difficult to understand? -- Alvesgaspar 10:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- No, and I didn't suggest that it was difficult to understand. But that doesn't mean I have to agree with it. I judge these things case-by-case. -- Ikan Kekek 19:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I updated the file description (and added a category) to specify that it's a cyclindrical projection, Poco a poco 11:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 19:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg 15:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Question Hi Milseburg, could you please elaborate why you consider the projection appropriate for the subject (maybe I am making a stupid mistake)? The way I see the problem is that you have two parallel lines in front of you: the river and the horizon. The only way we have to depict both as straight and parallel on a panorama is to use the rectilinear projection. Am I wrong? Unless you consider that it is ok to show one of them as a curve; or both of them, for that matter, as in here. -- Alvesgaspar 13:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- The rectilinear projection has the advantage that all straight lines are actually mapped straight. However, it is only suitable for a relatively small angle of view. With a large angle of view, it results in very disturbing, unnatural-looking distortions in the edge areas of the image. It is therefore not suitable for long motifs. In the case of cylindrical projection, horizontal lines are shown curved - except for the horizon line. In landscape shots, however, this peculiarity is not as evident. Differentiate that from architectural panoramas. --Milseburg 14:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- It is evident here, as well as in the previous panorama of the same subject: the river is straight and perpendicular to the line of sight, but is appears curved in the photo. -- Alvesgaspar 16:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Diego should add the coordinates here. The satellite image shows that the river is not really straight. He should also add the Pano template, which says that "the content of the image may vary slightly from reality when multiple images have been combined". So it is a good and legitimate way to show such an overview over a landscape. Every other projection has other weaknesses that do not lead to a better result as long as we do not have a viewer who can compensate for the inevitable distortions. But as I said: They are to minor for a rejection. --Milseburg (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- The rectilinear projection has the advantage that all straight lines are actually mapped straight. However, it is only suitable for a relatively small angle of view. With a large angle of view, it results in very disturbing, unnatural-looking distortions in the edge areas of the image. It is therefore not suitable for long motifs. In the case of cylindrical projection, horizontal lines are shown curved - except for the horizon line. In landscape shots, however, this peculiarity is not as evident. Differentiate that from architectural panoramas. --Milseburg 14:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Neutral OK, I'd really like to support this image. But at the end of the day Alvesgaspar's argumentation is convincing. If a used production method leads to very unrealistic reproduction of lines, dimension, curves etc, this can not be QI. The rules don't say anything about, this may always happen as long as it is stated in the description. --Augustgeyler 12:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --Augustgeyler 13:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Promoted --Augustgeyler 13:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)