Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 01 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:House_sparrow_(India).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination House sparrow--Fitindia 13:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)~
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, composition is nice but the picture is noisy. --Nikhil B 13:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I have added a newer version with less nose please do have a look. --Fitindia 15:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, still far from QI. Unsharp and noisy. --Milseburg 16:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Not only noisy, but a large area of the belly is blown out with no visible detail whatsoever. -- Ikan Kekek 21:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-AMG_GLE_43_(P1070799).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG GLE 43, Sofia, Bulgaria --MB-one 14:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose While the background doesn't have to be sharp since we're focused on the car, it is very unsharp and noisy here --Daniel Case 15:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • The background is out of focus to highlight the main subject. Also could you indicate, where you see noise? --MB-one 16:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I don't care enough about the background to oppose or even be neutral, as I'm not distracted by it, and the car is fine. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Somewhat unusual lighting. --Smial 09:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Judensau_001_(Cadolzburg).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sandsteinrelief am Burgtor, größte Judensau-Skulptur (1380–1480, stark verwittert).Dieses Bild zeigt ein Baudenkmal.Es ist Teil der Denkmalliste von Bayern, Nr. E-5-73-114-1.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Main subject is too small --MB-one 14:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Wie will man sonst die Größe glaubhaft machen und darstellen? Ich gehe auch davon aus, das die Denkmalnummer die ganze Wand beinhaltet, Bildhauer brauchen den Sandstein und Farbe der Umgebung. Gerade im Vergleich zu dem Sandstein in Spalt... Die Detailaufnahme findet sich hierː Judensau Cadolzburg HaJN6146.jpg --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 15:31, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Ich meinte, dass das Relief absolut (ca. 1 MPx) zu klein abgebildet ist. Ich setze es mal auf Diskussion für 3. Meinungen. --MB-one 16:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I'm too distracted by the crop of the upper relief. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This composition all looks a bit unclear to me; it's not really clear what the subject is supposed to be.--Peulle 10:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Teatro_marmoreo_fontana_Filippo_V_lato_sud_dettaglio_Palermo.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Teatro marmoreo fountain in Palermo. --Moroder 23:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose motion blur --MB-one 23:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
I disagree --Moroder 08:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Check the edges of the sculpture. Especially against the sky, it's clearly visible. --MB-one 17:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment It’s not my fault, it’s the statue that moved it’s head. Otherwise all the image would be blurred --Moroder 23:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Very large photo, and I think it's fine. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't know the reason, but the sculpture is increasingly unsharp towards the top. Visible even downscaled to less than 6 MPixels. --Smial 10:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Hamburg_Museumsplatz_Fountain_Figure.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hamburg-Harburg, Museumsplatz, figure on fountain from 1913/1914, donated by Friedrich Thörl --KaiBorgeest 23:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Please explain. --KaiBorgeest 20:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Overexposed and looks downsized --GPSLeo 09:02, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Imho its a little bit unsharp, the bright parts are overexposed and the background is too dominating. Maybe everything is correctable. Greetings --Dirtsc 08:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for your comments, I will try to correct the exposition; Since I just like the deep sun, I will not equalize it completely. The background is intentionally unsharp, how do you mean 'too dominating' in a correctable way?--KaiBorgeest 22:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I would just crop it a bit at the right side and at the top. I suggest a crop were only the half of the right window is visible. so the statue can fill a greater part of the image. Greetings --Dirtsc 12:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
    • ✓ New version (looks distorted now in this window, please click it for a proper view).--KaiBorgeest 20:46, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Too small for this borderline degree of sharpness to be acceptable for QI, in my opinion, regardless of whether you downsized the photo to make it seem less unsharp or not. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle 07:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Cinema_Palace,_St._Gallen_(1Y7A2155).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Palace, St. Gallen --MB-one 17:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'am afraid that vertical lines should be fixed.< Otherwise QI --Moroder 18:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
    • @Moroder: ✓ Done perspective correction applied. Thanks for the suggestion. --MB-one 11:14, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 19:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Kunststoff_Plastik_Rest_Abfall_1446-PSD.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rest from a plastics processing machine at a recycling centre --Ermell 07:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeI disagree Strong clipping in red and blue channel. Yes, i know that intense red tones are pretty nasty to handle, especially for digital cameras, but with red flowers it would also be a serious deficiency. --Smial 13:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support not perfect but good enough for QI. --MB-one 19:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Pato_aguja_africano_(Anhinga_rufa),_parque_nacional_de_Chobe,_Botsuana,_2018-07-28,_DD_47.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination African darter (Anhinga rufa), Chobe National Park, Botswana --Poco a poco 18:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Nice shot, but not quite sharp enough --MB-one 21:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me: it seems to me that the movement is well captured --Ercé 08:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The same as with lots of my sports photos that get filtered out before even importing them from the camera due to missing the focus. Focal plane is a fair bit in front of the bird, so your camera and/or lens wasn't just fast enough. Better luck next time. --Granada 08:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
    "Better luck next time", you can wait the whole day to see something like this and go home with no luck. It's not fair to compare it to a soccer game or car racing. There you'll have the opportunity to adjust your settings again and again and still have nice subjects. It doesn't work like this in the jungle --Poco a poco 18:44, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
    Erm... no. In sports (or, in my horizon of experience, concert photography) you have also lots of moments which are not repeatable. If you caught the moment, but quality isn't good enough, well, then the image still can be useful without QI-Bapperl. --Smial 13:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed.--Peulle 15:02, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support It'is a rare moment that can never be repeated and qualiy is acceptable for me --Armenak Margarian 07:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, too strong frontfocus. Similar to the other image, but in this case not fixable. Please try VI. --Smial 13:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)