Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 31 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Brügge_(B),_Rathaus_--_2018_--_8490.jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 08:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himeji_Castle_with_tree.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Himeji Castle, Prefecture Hyōgo, Japan --Chme82 20:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too noisy --Ezarate 23:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version noise reduction uploaded. Thank you.--QICbot (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
  • The QICbot uploads noise reductions?? --Basotxerri 14:39, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
  • I've already tried to bribe QICbot several times. Now it has worked out the first time ;-). I'm sorry, something went wrong with my signature.--Chme82 20:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image needs a perspective correction, both sides are leaning in? I'm not sure about the composition: the main subject is the castle but it seems to be the tree. --Basotxerri 14:39, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version with perspective correction uploaded. I can't see any problems with the composition: The castle is in focus, it's clearly visible (about 2/3 of the picture) and it's accompanied by the tree (about 1/3 of the picture) (Being the nominator, my oppinion does doesn't matter here of course. The decision is up to you). Thank you.--Chme82 18:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Acceptable, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 03:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Much worse images have passed but let's see if we get more opinions. --Basotxerri 08:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support The denoising has blurred some detail. The first version was good enough in matters of noise and has somewhat better sharpness. I'll strike the word "weak" if there were a version with well done perspective correction, but without unecessary noise reduction. --Smial 13:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't see any noise problems in the first version too. Therefore I've reset sharpness those parameters. But now I definitely wont get a PRO from Ezarate? --Chme82 19:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)