Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 30 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Leijepolder pumping station. Wetterskip Fryslân in Súdwest-Fryslân.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Angelica archangelica on the banks of the Broeresleat. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Reliefs on the pillars of the arcades at Lambertikirchplatz and at Alten Steinweg in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Reliefs on the pillars of the arcades at Lambertikirchplatz and at Alten Steinweg in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination St. Lamberti church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination St. Lamberti church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cross on the base of the Nepomuk statue on the Aa bridge at Bispinghof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cross on the base of the Nepomuk statue on the Aa bridge at Bispinghof in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sculpture “Strukturale Konstellationen - Zwei Supraporten” at LWL-Museum für Kunst and Kultur in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sculpture “Strukturale Konstellationen - Zwei Supraporten” at LWL-Museum für Kunst and Kultur in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shop “Roggenmarkt 11/12” in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shop “Roggenmarkt 11/12” in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Western partial view of Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Western partial view of Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Western rustication portal of the Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Western rustication portal of the Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Coat of arms of the state Carinthia at the overdoor of the western portal of the Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Coat of arms of the state Carinthia at the overdoor of the western portal of the Landhaus on Landhaushof #1, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Window at the former state mining authority on Herrengasse #9, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Window at the former state mining authority on Herrengasse #9, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Palais Helldorf on Herrengasse #12, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Palais Helldorf on Herrengasse #12, inner city, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Old dock and the Zactal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico --Cvmontuy 02:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Old dock and the Zactal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico --Cvmontuy 02:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination All Saints Anglican Church, Burwood --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination All Saints Anglican Church, Burwood --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Burwood Christian Centre, Burwood --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Burwood Christian Centre, Burwood --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Burwood Christian Centre, Burwood --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Burwood Christian Centre, Burwood --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shirley Boys' High School, Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shirley Boys' High School, Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shirley Boys' High School, Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shirley Boys' High School, Christchurch --Podzemnik 02:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Observation tower on the Wurbauerkogel, Austria. -- Bwag 22:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Observation tower on the Wurbauerkogel, Austria. -- Bwag 22:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination DKW RT 175 VW from 1957 -- Spurzem 20:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination DKW RT 175 VW from 1957 -- Spurzem 20:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cloister of the Vallombrosa Abbey--PROPOLI87 22:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 01:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cloister of the Vallombrosa Abbey--PROPOLI87 22:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 01:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Leaf and pine in the water--PROPOLI87 22:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Doen't seem to be in focus --Podzemnik 03:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Leaf and pine in the water--PROPOLI87 22:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Doen't seem to be in focus --Podzemnik 03:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boom barrier restricting acces to theHaithabu-Dannewerk nature reserve in Busdorf, Schleswig-Holstein --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boom barrier restricting acces to theHaithabu-Dannewerk nature reserve in Busdorf, Schleswig-Holstein --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Squat toilet at the Seafarers' Club Duckdalben, Hamburg --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality.Un-centered subject, no perspective. The subject of the photo does not seem appropriate for the label. Moreover, I do not see what can be remarkable in the photographic technique in this photo. --Elryck 18:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Squat toilet at the Seafarers' Club Duckdalben, Hamburg --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality.Un-centered subject, no perspective. The subject of the photo does not seem appropriate for the label. Moreover, I do not see what can be remarkable in the photographic technique in this photo. --Elryck 18:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cruise ship Queen Elizabeth in Stockholms frihamn --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cruise ship Queen Elizabeth in Stockholms frihamn --MB-one 18:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 19th century house in one of the oldest roads in Charleroi. --Jmh2o 17:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination 19th century house in one of the oldest roads in Charleroi. --Jmh2o 17:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The church of Saint George in Kalamas, Crete --C messier 17:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination The church of Saint George in Kalamas, Crete --C messier 17:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The church of Saint Paraskevi at Melambes, Crete --C messier 17:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination The church of Saint Paraskevi at Melambes, Crete --C messier 17:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Monastiraki, Amari, Crete. --C messier 17:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Monastiraki, Amari, Crete. --C messier 17:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination egg of Audouin's gull - Oeuf de Goéland d'Audouin --Ercé 16:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion {{{2}}}
    • Nomination egg of Audouin's gull - Oeuf de Goéland d'Audouin --Ercé 16:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion {{{2}}}
  • * Nomination Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia --Poco a poco 15:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia --Poco a poco 15:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Horch V 12 Cabriolet 670 in a showcase of the "museum mobile" in Ingolstadt -- Spurzem 14:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Horch V 12 Cabriolet 670 in a showcase of the "museum mobile" in Ingolstadt -- Spurzem 14:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 小湊鉄道の上総久保駅と同鉄道キハ200形車両En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:MaedaAkihiko --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Beautiful colors, good quality -- Spurzem 14:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination 小湊鉄道の上総久保駅と同鉄道キハ200形車両En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:MaedaAkihiko --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Beautiful colors, good quality -- Spurzem 14:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 岡崎市こども自然遊びの森 わんParkEn tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:Evelyn-rose --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Looks like a phone picture. Oversaturated --Podzemnik 03:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination 岡崎市こども自然遊びの森 わんParkEn tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:Evelyn-rose --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Looks like a phone picture. Oversaturated --Podzemnik 03:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Japanese Garden, Mount Coot-tha, Queensland. By User:Kgbo --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 14:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Japanese Garden, Mount Coot-tha, Queensland. By User:Kgbo --Elryck 13:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 14:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Germany, Lieser, Am alten Posthof --Berthold Werner 13:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 13:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Germany, Lieser, Am alten Posthof --Berthold Werner 13:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 13:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Farm in Lauter, Fårö. --ArildV 12:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Le ciel n'est pas sur-saturé, la résolution est fine (300pp) comme l'iso, et le placement de la maison à mi-chemin du ciel et du jardin donne une très jolie perspective.--Elryck 12:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Farm in Lauter, Fårö. --ArildV 12:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Le ciel n'est pas sur-saturé, la résolution est fine (300pp) comme l'iso, et le placement de la maison à mi-chemin du ciel et du jardin donne une très jolie perspective.--Elryck 12:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Helgumannen is a fishing village near the nature reserve of Langhammars at Fårö island (Gotland, Sweden). --ArildV 12:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Helgumannen is a fishing village near the nature reserve of Langhammars at Fårö island (Gotland, Sweden). --ArildV 12:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The view of 3 Maja street with bus pas, bikeway and new part of Sielecki Park --Stimoroll 12:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Très beau paysage. La résolution est très fine, on voit énormément de détail, bon contraste et la composition est équilibrée. Les couleurs sont légèrement saturées mais je trouve que cela passe bien. --Elryck 13:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination The view of 3 Maja street with bus pas, bikeway and new part of Sielecki Park --Stimoroll 12:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Très beau paysage. La résolution est très fine, on voit énormément de détail, bon contraste et la composition est équilibrée. Les couleurs sont légèrement saturées mais je trouve que cela passe bien. --Elryck 13:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination All Saints Anglican Church, Burwood --Podzemnik 10:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 13:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination All Saints Anglican Church, Burwood --Podzemnik 10:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 13:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Spanjaardsgat and the barge Spinola in Breda. --Velvet 10:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. If you have more images that just focus on the Spanjaardsgat watergate, please consider uploading and nominating for QI. --GRDN711 12:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Spanjaardsgat and the barge Spinola in Breda. --Velvet 10:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. If you have more images that just focus on the Spanjaardsgat watergate, please consider uploading and nominating for QI. --GRDN711 12:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The last wall--Celeda 09:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Lack of details --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination The last wall--Celeda 09:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Lack of details --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ruined farm--Celeda 09:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Tilted, lack of details --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ruined farm--Celeda 09:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Tilted, lack of details --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The weather vane and the bell tower just before their destruction--Celeda 09:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Strange composition, lack of details --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination The weather vane and the bell tower just before their destruction--Celeda 09:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Strange composition, lack of details --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination . By User:Manchot --Elryck 06:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination . By User:Manchot --Elryck 06:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ours polaire (Zoo de La Palmyre)En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:Darkhimmel --Elryck 06:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ours polaire (Zoo de La Palmyre)En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :. By User:Darkhimmel --Elryck 06:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of the mountain and cable car (Skyline Gondola Queenstown) from the viewing deck. --Vincent60030 06:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality. Blown out sky, odd colour balance, generally unsharp/blurry, quite a bit of fringing. --Hiàn 20:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of the mountain and cable car (Skyline Gondola Queenstown) from the viewing deck. --Vincent60030 06:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. Blown out sky, odd colour balance, generally unsharp/blurry, quite a bit of fringing. --Hiàn 20:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Interior of the protestant church St. Michael Kirchahorn --Ermell 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Interior of the protestant church St. Michael Kirchahorn --Ermell 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Organ gallery in the protestant church St. Michael Kirchahorn --Ermell 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Organ gallery in the protestant church St. Michael Kirchahorn --Ermell 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pipe organ of the town chapel St. Michael and Laurentius in Waischenfeld --Ermell 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pipe organ of the town chapel St. Michael and Laurentius in Waischenfeld --Ermell 05:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Budding flower buds of an Agapanthus 'Windlebrook'. Focus stack of 18 photos. --Famberhorst 05:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Budding flower buds of an Agapanthus 'Windlebrook'. Focus stack of 18 photos.
      --Famberhorst 05:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vegetation at the Panoramic trail at the Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vegetation at the Panoramic trail at the Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ma'ale akrabim. By User:Eranfel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support A little soft, but by design as a 3-second exposure. Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ma'ale akrabim. By User:Eranfel --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support A little soft, but by design as a 3-second exposure. Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Hebrew Worker. By User:Degser --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Coast at Porto Moniz, Madeira --Llez 05:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Coast at Porto Moniz, Madeira --Llez 05:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vegetation along the Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vegetation along the Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A tree used as footbridge over the Seebach stream in the Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination A tree used as footbridge over the Seebach stream in the Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Turk's cap lily (Lilium martagon) --Uoaei1 04:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Turk's cap lily (Lilium martagon) --Uoaei1 04:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gaston Museum, Joinerville, Texas. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 23:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gaston Museum, Joinerville, Texas. By User:Nv8200pa --Another Believer 23:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wayside cross in Bad Wörishofen, St.-Anna-Straße -- Spurzem 16:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wayside cross in Bad Wörishofen, St.-Anna-Straße -- Spurzem 16:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Engine of a Mercedes-Benz SL (W113) restored by Brabus Classic at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 16:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC) * Withdrawn The engine drowns completely in the restless surroundings. In addition, the light reflections are extremely disturbing. -- Spurzem 16:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC) I'm afraid, that's not fixable. Therefore  I withdraw my nomination. --MB-one 18:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Buoy in front of the Humboldt Bay Maritime Museum in Samoa, California --Frank Schulenburg 15:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Buoy in front of the Humboldt Bay Maritime Museum in Samoa, California --Frank Schulenburg 15:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Crossroad of New Brighton Rd - Burwood Rd, Burwood --Podzemnik 06:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Ok for QI --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Crossroad of New Brighton Rd - Burwood Rd, Burwood --Podzemnik 06:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Ok for QI --Uoaei1 10:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fin bathroom in Fin garden, Kashan, Iran--Amirpashaei 08:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Looks tilted to me, either that's the case or the building is tilted for real --Poco a poco 11:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Not the 100% perfect angle, but close to. Very good photo. --Augustgeyler 17:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC) I'd like to here first the author before I decide the review --Poco a poco 21:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Fine to me too after reading Amirpashai answer on this image in FPC --Poco a poco 09:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fin bathroom in Fin garden, Kashan, Iran--Amirpashaei 08:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      Looks tilted to me, either that's the case or the building is tilted for real --Poco a poco 11:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
       Support Not the 100% perfect angle, but close to. Very good photo. --Augustgeyler 17:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
      I'd like to here first the author before I decide the review --Poco a poco 21:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
       Support Fine to me too after reading Amirpashai answer on this image in FPC --Poco a poco 09:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Equality March 2018 in Częstochowa. By User:Silar --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination: Equality March 2018 in Częstochowa. By User:Silar --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination: Aschaffenburg, protected landscape element 2 (LB-01417, "Böschungshang entlang des Niedernberger Weges im Nilkheimer Grund") --KaiBorgeest 21:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Aschaffenburg, protected landscape element 2 (LB-01417, "Böschungshang entlang des Niedernberger Weges im Nilkheimer Grund") --KaiBorgeest 21:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Inside of the Imam Zamin's Tomb, Qutb Minar complex. --Syed07 14:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Inside of the Imam Zamin's Tomb, Qutb Minar complex. --Syed07 14:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination: Equality March 2018 in Rzeszów. By User:Silar --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • * Nomination Yuval Rabin. By User:Nitzan Hafner --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Bwag 22:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Inside of Azan Tower at Qutb Minar Complex --Syed07 06:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment Too dark --Moroder 10:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Light improved. Thank you. --Syed07 08:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Inside of Azan Tower at Qutb Minar Complex --Syed07 06:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment Too dark --Moroder 10:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
      Light improved. Thank you. --Syed07 08:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 01:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Confluences Museum, Lyon, France--Celeda 11:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Apart of technical shortcommings (too noisy), NO FOP in France --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Confluences Museum, Lyon, France--Celeda 11:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Apart of technical shortcommings (too noisy), NO FOP in France --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Confluences Museum, Lyon, France--Celeda 06:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Apart of technical shortcommings (too noisy), NO FOP in France --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Confluences Museum, Lyon, France--Celeda 06:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Apart of technical shortcommings (too noisy), NO FOP in France --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roof of the Confluences Museum Lyon, France--Celeda 06:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Apart of technical shortcommings (too noisy), NO FOP in France --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roof of the Confluences Museum Lyon, France--Celeda 06:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Apart of technical shortcommings (too noisy), NO FOP in France --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination French bulldog head, Josselin --Tsaag Valren 20:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality. Disturbing leash, sorry --Moroder 15:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination French bulldog head, Josselin --Tsaag Valren 20:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. Disturbing leash, sorry --Moroder 15:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rice terraces near Thon Tha village in Ha Giang, Vietnam. --Velvet 10:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rice terraces near Thon Tha village in Ha Giang, Vietnam. --Velvet 10:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
       Support Good quality. --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Myosotis in Tver oblast, Russia by StanVicS --Ludvig14 08:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Info Misidentified. This is Veronica chamaedrys or a lookalike species, not Myosotis. Also, not much is in focus here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)  Oppose Category was corrected, but the image name is still wrong. Also, the description does not make any reference to the flower seen here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Myosotis in Tver oblast, Russia by StanVicS --Ludvig14 08:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Info Misidentified. This is Veronica chamaedrys or a lookalike species, not Myosotis. Also, not much is in focus here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
       Oppose Category was corrected, but the image name is still wrong. Also, the description does not make any reference to the flower seen here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portrait Painting of Jakub Jasiński (1761-1794) --Scotch Mist 06:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Too unsharp and underexposed. --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portrait Painting of Jakub Jasiński (1761-1794) --Scotch Mist 06:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Too unsharp and underexposed. --C messier 17:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Schoens Palace in Sosnowiec -- ~~~~ * Decline  Oppose Perspective issues, sharpness, shadows too dark, ... --XRay 04:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Schoens Palace in Sosnowiec -- ~~~~
    • Decline
       Oppose Perspective issues, sharpness, shadows too dark, ... --XRay 04:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Calluna vulgaris (common heather), Panoramic trail at the Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC) * Promotion it is a good photo. But I am unsure about its composition. The main object might be to similar to its environment --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment Please remember, that this is the natural environment of this plant. The Common Heather grows in a heather landscape, hence its name. --Llez 17:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:04, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Nomination Calluna vulgaris (common heather), Panoramic trail at the Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park --Llez 05:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Promotion
      it is a good photo. But I am unsure about its composition. The main object might be to similar to its environment --Augustgeyler 09:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
       Comment Please remember, that this is the natural environment of this plant. The Common Heather grows in a heather landscape, hence its name. --Llez 17:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
       Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:04, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Burwood_Anglican_Cemetery,_Christchurch,_New_Zealand.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Burwood Anglican Cemetery, Christchurch --Podzemnik 06:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose main object in shadow --Augustgeyler 08:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK for QI. --XRay 08:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good perspective at right, pleasant and unsaturated colors, good contrasts, fine details. But the left side is not good. The building and the cross make a bad contrast and spoil the perspective.
  • Vote stricken; signature needed.--Peulle 18:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 07:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Münster,_Hafen,_Wolfgang-Borchert-Theater_--_2020_--_8117.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wolfgang Borchert Theater in the port of Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but this can not be seen as a quality picture due to its cropp and the shadow on the main object --Augustgeyler 07:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Perfectly OK, IMO. I'm not allergic to shadows. -- Ikan Kekek 06:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 07:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Banco_conmemorativo,_plaza_de_San_Francisco,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_79.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Commemorative bench, San Francisco square, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 10:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose lights --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
    "Lights"?! what kind of reason is that to oppose here? please, elaborate, a clear QI to me. --Poco a poco 21:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Very solid QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support as nominated.--Peulle 07:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support No doubts, a QI --Michielverbeek 17:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Bij_Borgholzhausen-Ostbarthausen,_akker_IMG_6866_2020-07-31_14.02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination near Ostbarthausen NRW-Güterloh, field --Michielverbeek 15:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Where is all the detail gone? I think it got lost by compression --Augustgeyler 21:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough for QI. --XRay 05:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support, because the resolution is somewhat low regarding current standards. But still printable to A4 or larger in good quality. I can not see any compression artifacts. The EXIF data seems reasonable and plausible for a camera of this type. --Smial 10:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 08:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 11:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ponte_vecchio,_e_parte_del_Corridoio_Vasariano_(sulla_destra).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ponte Vecchio, and part of the Vasari Corridor which is an elevated path that connects Palazzo Vecchio with Palazzo Pitti in Florence passing through the Uffizi and over the Ponte Vecchio. passing through the Uffizi (on the right). The Arno is particularly blue due to the beautiful sky that is reflected in it, for the clear day on which the photo was taken.. --PROPOLI87 14:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good composition, excellent dynamic range --Augustgeyler 12:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too unsharp and noisy on the right. -- Ikan Kekek 19:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
You're absolutely right, I exaggerated in wanting to lighten, the right side was in shadow in the original. I will resume and please criticize me until it is perfect. I really like this photo and will work on it till I drop. Thank you!PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It looks like JPEG compression. And f/5.6 isn't a good choice, a closer aperture would be better. --XRay 05:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The colors are beautiful, it feels like Florence. Shadow and Light.--Celeda 13:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Some areas with blurring noise reduction, somewhat high colour saturation, but probably the best you can get from a small sensor camera. "Good enough". --Smial 11:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great motif, but per Ikan. The right side doesn't meet the QI standard. --Milseburg 16:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan --Michielverbeek 20:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   XRay 06:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Karl_Krause_Fabrik_in_Leipzig_Anger-Crottendorf_mit_stillgelegtem_Bahndamm.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Former Karl-Krause-Factory in Leipzig, once largest factory for printing machines with its old train station in the foreground --Augustgeyler 10:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unfavorable composition: blurred foreground too dominant and disturbing. --Milseburg 14:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment The foreground is very important as it shows the rests of the old trainstation connecting this factory --Augustgeyler 21:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ok, but foreground not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 05:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. The main question isn't whether the foreground is important but why it has to be such a big blur. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. The foreground is probably somewhat too prominent, but that is part of the composition chosen by the photographer. From a technical point of view the photo is ok. Whether you find the foreground disturbing or accept it as a design element is purely a matter of taste. The foreground does not obstruct the view of the main motif. --Smial 11:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If the "foreground is very important", it should be sharp. --Palauenc05 11:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 11:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Qutb_complex_-Delhi_-Delhi_-SSI_0002.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Arabic verses written in the wall of the Qutb Minar. --Syed07 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the ccw tilt mentioned by @Poco a poco: on 13 September 2019 is still not corrected. Furthermore I see some green fringes around the top of the tower. --PtrQs 10:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Tilt corrected, fringes and color noise reduced. Unfortunateley you paid for that with sharpness and contrast. But acceptable now, --PtrQs 22:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per PtrQs. --Smial 11:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Corrected as per suggestion. --Syed07 16:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Re-nominating without any attempt to address the problems described in previous nominations is not very respectful towards the reviewer Poco a poco 21:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I guess you are dissatisfied because of the respect you said. it's getting hard to check daily as i am not regular. And I am sorry as I didn't see your previous comment when nominating. But you can see my previous comment where i said that correction was done as per suggestion. --Syed07 08:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --PtrQs (talk) 22:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Rajashan_Mound,_Bangladesh.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rajashan Mound of King Harishchandra. --Syed07 09:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose bad light and cropping --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. --Ermell 15:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Not ideal, but good enough for QI --Kritzolina 19:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Bayreuth_Gravenreuther_Stift_Portal-20190324-RM-162946.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Door to the Gravenreuther Monastery in St. Georgen Bayreuth --Ermell 07:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose missing shadows and dynamic range --Augustgeyler 10:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I disagree. --Ermell 15:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 Comment At the right it tilts a bit to the left. But I don't understand what dynamic range should be missing. Spurzem 18:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak  Support Look my commentary above. -- Spurzem 06:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 Comment @Augustgeyler: I do not find in the Image guidelines the obligation to have a shadow to obtain the quality image label. --H2O(talk) 07:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --H2O(talk) 07:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 07:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Puente_la_unidad2020.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination La unidad bridge in Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico --Cvmontuy 01:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the bridge is not sharp. --XRay 03:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The bridge ist as sharp as the resolution allowes --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Left bottom is a white edge. This must be fixed. --XRay 04:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with XRay on the white edge. However, I would support the photo once you fix that. -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose White edges, and the horizon is curved. Fixable, but opposing for now.--Peulle 07:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks I just remove the white edges but not the curve sorry, regards --Cvmontuy 20:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   XRay 06:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Plaza_Alta,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_31.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plaza Alta, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 07:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose well composed, but very low dynamic range --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • A bold review IMHO, this is a clear QI --Poco a poco 19:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. I don't understand this "dynamic range" thingy. The high contrast is well controlled. --Smial 11:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- ReneeWrites 19:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 11:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Plaza_Alta,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_35.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plaza Alta, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 07:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose very low dynamic range --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • A bold review IMHO, this is a clear QI --Poco a poco 19:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Bright day, a bit hazy. -- Ikan Kekek 06:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK. --XRay 12:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Exposure on the high side, but still acceptable. --Smial 12:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 08:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't understand what our new critic means time and again by the "dynamic range" that he misses. -- Spurzem 11:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Burwood_war_memorial,_Christchurch,_Canterbury,_New_Zealand_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Burwood war memorial, Christchurch, Canterbury --Podzemnik 04:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose disturbing background --Augustgeyler 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The background is not optimal, but good enough for QI. --XRay 14:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Per XRay --Michielverbeek 05:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment The background is fine, but isn't the monument tilted?--Peulle 08:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks tilted. But looking at several other objects it seems to correspond to the real situation. --Smial 12:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough, --Jakubhal 19:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 08:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support @Augustgeyler: Ich nehme an, dass der Fotograf nicht die Genehmigung erhielt, die Bäume abzuholzen. -- Spurzem 11:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 CommentLothar, du weißt doch: Flex, Kettensäge und Hubwagen gehören zur Standardausstattung jedes Wikiknipsers ;-) --Smial 09:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Pichl_bei_Wels_Friedhofslinde-9306.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lime tree on the cemetery of Pichl bei Wels --Isiwal 21:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overexposure --Augustgeyler 11:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit oversharpened but good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 05:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Exposure looks fine, cats and descritpion are ok, compo, as well, clear QI to me Poco a poco 21:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 14:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Technik-Museum_Puetnitz,_Ribnitz-Damgarten_(IMG_0119).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Robur LO/LD at Technik-Museum Pütnitz --MB-one 19:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose low dynamik range, some overexposure --Augustgeyler 11:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, looks pretty true-to-life to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Perhaps not the best composition but not bad -- Spurzem 06:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   XRay 07:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Banco_conmemorativo,_plaza_de_San_Francisco,_Badajoz,_España,_2020-07-22,_DD_77.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Commemorative bench, San Francisco square, Badajoz, Spain --Poco a poco 05:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. the light is not good to let it become a quality picture --Augustgeyler 09:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support If this image's light is not good enough for a QI, I think more than 75% of all images on QIC would fail as well.--Peulle 08:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 08:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 11:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Marcinelle_-_Haut_fourneau_numéro_4_-_2020-08-22_-_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Marcinelle (Charleroi-Belgium) - Blast furnace number 4 being demolished. --Jmh2o 10:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.,colors and details are OK --Celeda 13:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose bad composition; horizon is missing;to much compression --Augustgeyler 20:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Sharpness could be better, but it's a fairly large photo and an interesting subject. I don't understand the complaint about a lack of a horizon; why would every photo of an outdoor scene need a horizon? -- Ikan Kekek 05:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I feel like this composition is a bit off; the image has lots of room on the top, but cuts elements of the buildings on the bottom.--Peulle 06:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I published another version with more details in the foreground. Further ahead, it is a road, without real interest. --Jmh2o 08:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The focus is clearly in the foreground; on the bottom right we can see the barbed wires and fence clearly, yet the pile of rubble ahead is blurry. The factory in the background looks OK without zooming in because it's a huge structure but it should be sharper and in focus. --Trougnouf 11:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan, regardless the image version. --Smial 12:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan, --Jakubhal 17:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK for QI. --XRay 05:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 19:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   XRay 06:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:125_Harvard_Street_-_Cambridge,_MA_-_DSC08943.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 125 Harvard Street - Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. By User:Daderot --Another Believer 18:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Despite the distortion, I like this angle --Celeda 16:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry to disagree. It requires perspective correction --Jakubhal 05:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The perspective is perfectly consistent and IMO fine, but the sky and some other places (e.g., some places in shadow) are too noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jakubhal. --Peulle 11:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred by denoising. Why iso 1000+ in bright sunlight? Also from this camera position a perspective correction would be possible and necessary without severe distortion. --Smial 11:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Because of the falling lines -- Spurzem 19:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   XRay 06:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Elektrárna_Štvanice,_20190816_1739_5426.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Štvanice hydroelectric power plant, Prague --Jakubhal 15:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Due to straightening the verticals, the building looks heavily distorted. --JiriMatejicek 23:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  CommentThe image is leaning out a little bit, but IMO it's not heavily distorted. --XRay 06:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Perspective correction slightly overdone. Should be fixable. -- Smial 10:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
    •  Comment Re-worked from scratch. Is it better now? --Jakubhal 13:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks better now. --Smial 13:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Ikan Kekek 21:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose a quality photo need better lights on the main object --Augustgeyler 08:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK for QI. --XRay 18:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 19:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 09:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Lothar_Path_-_Black_Forest_National_Park_-_Pteridium_aquilinum_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Pteridium aquilinum (Eagle fern), Lothar Path, Black Forest National Park, --Llez 05:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree , Depth of field not very good, specialy in the upper side. --Celeda 17:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO sharpness and DoF are OK. --XRay 06:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Subject is the fern, and that is sharp enough. --Smial 10:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose composition, no depth --Augustgeyler 08:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 12:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 12:04, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 11:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Melilotus_albus_RF.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination White melilot (Melilotus albus) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality.The focus on the left branch is not good --Celeda 07:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but this is not acceptable; please always mention the reason for your declination. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The picture is beautiful, but the depth of field should have been greater, as the distant parts of plant are blurred. I guess the aparture was too wide for it to be a QI --Navinsingh133 01:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks. Unfortunately, there was not much choice for the aperture here, at least in my opinion. I chose 5.6; even with 6.3 (the next possibility) the road in the background of this roadside plant would have been much more disturbing. This is a slender, heavily branched plant with tiny flowers, not something like a sunflower or a big red rose. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Solidly sharp enough for QI, in my opinion, and I think maybe we're looking through mist. -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Meets QI standards for 2006, although it would not pass today with this level at this resolution.--Peulle 06:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Resolution is still acceptable, but it is the DoF that worries me, close call.
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   XRay 07:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_August_30_2020&oldid=699288747"