Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 28 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Paisaje_en_Cerro_Brujo,_isla_de_San_Cristóbal,_islas_Galápagos,_Ecuador,_2015-07-24,_DD_112.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination View of Cerro Brujo, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 06:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  OpposeTilted cw, not that sharp, fringes, colors look unnatural (oversaturation ?). I wish a third opinion, please.--Jebulon 09:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment True, it was tilted, ✓ New version Poco a poco 17:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok now for me --Hubertl 06:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--Σπάρτακος 15:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 18:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Eisvogeltreffen.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ein männlicher (links) Eisvogel (Alcedo atthis) und ein Jungvogel (rechts) auf einem Ast im Naturschutzgebiet „Berkelaue II“ (NSG BOR-070) in 48691 Vreden. By User:Joefrei --Jean11 21:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Strange artifacts. Looks like a photoshopped composition to me... --Tsungam 06:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI 4 me. --Palauenc05 08:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Tsungam. --Code 07:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support -- Spurzem 17:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm afraid I have to agree with Tsungam --Hockei 08:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great moment but quality is just not enough, the left note looks to me like a sloppy editing Poco a poco 20:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Stuttgart Höhenpark Killesberg Habich Adorant-Jüngling.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Skulptur "Adorant/Jüngling" --MSeses 14:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Xicotencatl 15:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: Magenta shimmer around neck and head. Colour noise in the dark parts of the metal. All fixable. --Cccefalon 16:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Cccefalon. And tilted (see note), bad crop (see note), CAs (see note)--Lmbuga 23:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:15-08-12-Model-Rotkäppchen-RalfR-N3S_0715.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Model photography --Ralf Roletschek 10:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 12:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too small,below 2 mpx--Σπάρτακος 12:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Σπάρτακος. And too tight at bottom IMO (or too much space at top). Bad detail with this size --Lmbuga 00:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not acceptable in QIC page because of size. No need of other comments, this is a no-go.--Jebulon 21:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 10:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Anatolian_Skipper_-_Muschampia_proteides.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wing upperside view of an Anatolian Skipper (Muschampia proteides). Darboğaz, Ulukışla - Niğde, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--ArildV 09:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wings are not in focus. Charlesjsharp 19:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me, not FP --Atamari 20:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Christian Ferrer 19:31, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The focus of the wing could be better. F10 is not so bad, but F13 would have been better. Also it is too bright, has to little contrast and sharpness. The last mentioned thinks are fixable. The composition is fine. --Hockei 17:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 10:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

File:District-Kunak_Sabah_Cow-02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination District Kunak, Sabah: A cow at the Lahad Datu - Kunak Road. --Cccefalon 04:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Nice --Pudelek 09:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Comment Head is over-exposed. Charlesjsharp 19:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I don't think so. There was neither a partial raising of heights nor any other operation concerning the exposure. It is just a white fur, whereas you can see structure in every part of the area. --Cccefalon 20:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. The head is in my opinion not too bright. -- Spurzem 13:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support White does not equal overexposed! --Jean11 00:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 10:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)