Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 27 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

==[edit]

  • Nomination Museum of Romanity in Nîmes--Celeda 08:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lacks detail, sorry --Poco a poco 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • What kind of details you hope for ? --Celeda 17:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
    I expect not to see artifacts and I expect to appreciate detail, you are going to have a hard time here proposing images from a cell phone to QI. It isn't impossible but the lighting conditions, the subject, compo and so on should be very favorable to achieve a QI Poco a poco 11:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks like JPEG artifacts. --XRay 06:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lots of artifacts where noise, denoising and sharpening collide. --Smial 10:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree all above. Plus parts are overexposed. Cell photos rarely make QI. FYI, your photos have the same issues you are criticizing about on photos from others. Seven Pandas 21:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 21:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)