Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 26 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Large-billed_tern_(Phaetusa_simplex)_in_flight.JPG[edit]

File:Parque_Estadual_Carlos_Botelho_Giordano_Rossi_(04).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trachycephalus mesophaeus. By User:Gionorossi --Rodrigo.Argenton 06:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Zcebeci 11:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
    It is quite sharp, and the eye are in focus. --Rodrigo.Argenton 19:12, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree, DoF is too shallow, and the POV is not really good to depict the frog Poco a poco 11:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, the eyes are in focus, but the rest of the body which is very prominent in the foreground is sadly not.--Augustgeyler 18:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:El_Zacatal_bridge,_Ciudad_del_Carmen_2020p4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Old dock and the Zactal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico --Cvmontuy 18:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Celeda 16:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me --Jakubhal 16:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Somewhat soft, but good composition and natural colours. --Smial 10:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Celeda. --Fischer.H 15:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit soft, but a very nice composition and sharp enough for the subject, IMO. Incidentally, "Insufficient quality" is unexplanatory and therefore an insufficient "reason" for opposing. You have to indicate what is insufficient. (I guess the sharpness? But I'm not sure.) -- Ikan Kekek 21:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Neutral well compossed, but it could be cropped a bit on the right
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Lithuanian_National_Museum_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Portrait Painting of Eustachy Tyszkiewicz in the Lithuanian Museum of Antiquities that he founded in Vilnius --Scotch Mist 07:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose spot light reflexion --Celeda 15:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    Don't disagree that there is reflected light on the painting but is this sufficient to be considered a 'distraction'? --Scotch Mist 06:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, unfortunately, I think it is. But if this is the best image in scope on Commons, please nominate it to COM:VIC. Celeda, I'm assuming you opposed, but if not, please change the vote I attributed to you. -- Ikan Kekek 21:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Озерцо_на_берегу_Байкала_недалеко_от_Чёртова_моста.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Swampy lake near Baikal lake. Russia, September 2017 --Veteran hiker 06:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Celeda 15:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy, missing details --Jakubhal 16:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed, look at the clouds. --PtrQs 13:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. The near left corner is particularly problematic. Too bad, because it's a pretty scene. -- Ikan Kekek 21:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Тайга_Среднего_Сакукана.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Taiga of the Middle Sakukan gorge. Kodar, Zabaikalsky Krai. August 2014 --Veteran hiker 11:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Celeda 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed, missing details --Jakubhal 16:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Definitely per Jakubhal, probably too much contrast Poco a poco 11:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Hesperia_comma,_Hartelholz,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2020-06-28,_DD_152-164_FS.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Silver-spotted skipper (Hesperia comma), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 21:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline blurry --Celeda 14:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC) I know that underwater photos are very difficult to do. I know your photo representes reality. But reality does not necessarly make a high quality photo even if your work is of great quality--Celeda 16:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
    Yes, it isn't definitely crispy sharp but do you what you are looking at and the size of it? --Poco a poco 11:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Hesperia comma is a butterfly. Everything in this photo is heavily blurred.Seven Pandas 20:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Seven Pandas. I don't think a photo that's blurred even on its file page is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 21:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Rocca_di_Manerba_Golfo_di_Manerba_del_Garda.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination La Rocca peak and the Gulf of Manerba. --Moroder 14:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Stitching erreor in the middle, two ghost birds on the left side and the right side is leaning. --Ermell 21:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
     Comment The above is by mistake the review for the other picture of 'La Rocca peak' (Rocca_da_Punta_Sasso_a_Manerba_del_Garda.jpg) by Moroder. --PtrQs 23:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    So here I see two stitching errors in the left upper corner and a dust spot just left of that little airplane, and the dust spots stitching twin to the left. --PtrQs 00:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC) Question @PtrQs: , @Ermell: Sorry but I can't see all this (airplain?), could you please put a note. Thanks--~~~~
    @Moroder: I tried to do my best, - according to your big size images the notes became very small. --PtrQs 17:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
    @Ermell: I tried to avoid this and gave comments and tips for correcting the errors, but by ignoring this and pre-promoting the nomination you let me no other possibility than going to CR. Why this? kopfschüttelnd - --PtrQs 23:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I fixed the minimal cloning errors in the upper left corner but I'm not able to see the dust spots even if marked with the notes. I found the 2-3 pixel airplane ;-). Thanks anyway --Moroder 11:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality now. --PtrQs 01:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Very well composed picture. I see so much detail and depth. Wonderful. --Augustgeyler 22:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Musée_de_la_Cité_de_l'Espace_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Prototype of a Soyouz space craft--Celeda 05:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Processing artefacts, sorry. --Peulle 07:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • What do you mean ? --Celeda 08:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Jagged edges scattered all over the image, especially visible along curves.--Peulle 21:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Point of sharpness is too much in front of the picture, maybe aperture is too large, additional too noisy imho --Stepro 14:34, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Rhesus_macaque_monkey_D72_16856k_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Adult female rhesus macaque, IIT Mandi, Himachal, India --Tagooty 04:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion too cute --Celeda 15:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I feel this one is overprocessed, there's just too much grain.--Peulle 07:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I've reduced the processing and uploaded the revised image. It looks more natural and is less grainy. Please consider this revised image. Ping Peulle Spurzem Ikan Kekek --Tagooty 07:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Peulle Please see the revised image with less processing --Tagooty 01:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support I seems a bit oversharpened. -- Spurzem 07:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle, a bit too grainy IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 02:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I've reduced the processing and uploaded a revised image. This looks more natural and is less grainy. Please consider this revised image. Ping Peulle Spurzem Ikan Kekek --Tagooty 07:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The new version is much better. --Smial 10:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Agreed. Big improvement. -- Ikan Kekek 11:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am missing a decision: Is it about the monkey's face? Then it should be cropped more. Or is it about the whole animal? Then I don't agree with cropping the lower part of its body.--Augustgeyler 22:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Augustgeyler The wistful expression and the body posture make for an endearing composition. The reddish colour of the leg complements the reddish face against the grayish body. A portrait alone would not show these aspects of Rhesus macaque. Two difficulties in showing the whole body: (1) do I include the long tail, then the face would become too small; (2) the monkey was in a leafy tree so more distraction lower down. --Tagooty 01:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

File:PaisajeTandil2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Landscape on sorrundings of Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 22:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Moroder 15:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Gotta disagree with this one; there are CA and a general lack of sharpness.--Peulle 07:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose .. and not to miss CCW tilt and vertical distortion. --PtrQs 13:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose to much content-less foreground--Augustgeyler 08:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Lieser_BW_2020-07-26_12-00-59.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Deutschland, Lieser, Am alten Posthof --Berthold Werner 06:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please ad a category suitable for the style of the house --Moroder 14:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ Done --Berthold Werner 20:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose very good without the lady --Celeda 14:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. The lady is fine --Moroder 20:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Moroder. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Die Lady bringt Leben ins Bild. -- Spurzem 13:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support People are a part of reality. --Stepro 14:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jakubhal 15:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Lexus_LC_500h,_IAA_2017,_Frankfurt_(1Y7A3199).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lexus LC 500h, IAA 2017 --MB-one 05:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose too many people, the man on the right is disturbing. But it is just my opinion --Celeda --Celeda 07:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMO the people are not so distractive --MB-one 16:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Works because the people are in shadow. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me.--Ermell 20:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support People are an essential part of an exhibition. --Stepro 14:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, it is a good picture. But not a quality one because of the disturbing background and the roof of the car which is badly morphing into that dark background.--Augustgeyler 22:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Вершины_Красавица,_Сказка,_Мечта.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Nizhneleninskoe lake, Altai. September 2015 --Veteran hiker 05:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Needs a better categorisation --Moroder 01:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Celeda 14:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. I see more rocks than lakes --Moroder 20:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Seven Pandas 21:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very striking composition, but the picture looks strange, I think oversharpened, and I agree with Moroder that the categorization is insufficient. At a minimum, a category is needed for the mountains. -- Ikan Kekek 11:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan.--Ermell 21:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)