Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 22 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Konopiště château near Benešov, Czech Republic.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Konopiště château near Benešov, Czech Republic --Ввласенко 10:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 12:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please fix overcategorization first. --A.Savin 18:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Ввласенко 06:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
    • @Ввласенко: It´s a good practice, to {{ping|UsernameXX}} the colleagues here, if you want them to response!
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Evangelische_Kirche_Hottenbach_Turm.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Turm Evangelische Kirche Hottenbach --Soloneying 11:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment A very tricky image to review. While it is sharp and mostly well lit, the overall impression of it is not QI. The angle of the tower is just between "needs perspetive correction" and "high tower with steep angled sides", some of the ivy is so bright green it looks posterized and at the bottom there is a big distracting sign with unreadable text almost in line with the tower. We sometimes promote images because the overall impression is QI despite faults, this is the opposite for me. W.carter 11:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: Thanks. Comments addressed in new version. --Soloneying 13:07, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Better light and crop, but if you are keeping it as a short tower I think it needs perspective correction. W.carter 14:24, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support For me it is O.K. now. -- Spurzem 15:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Light, sharpness and crop very good. A stronger perspective correction would lead to too much distortion and an unnatural look. Greetings --Dirtsc 09:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)