Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 19 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Copera marginipes 4982.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Copera marginipes --Vengolis 02:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not a QI for me, the tail is not sharp and clear, seems unfocused and over exposed Deepugn 04:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Deepugn. -- Ikan Kekek 08:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 08:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Eurybrachys sp 9118.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Eurybrachys,Eurybrachidae --Vengolis 02:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Defenitely not a QI for me, unsharp image Deepugn 04:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild  Oppose - I find my eyes straining just a bit with this one, and it's a smaller file than the other one. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 08:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Eurybrachys sp 9105.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Eurybrachys,Eurybrachidae --Vengolis 02:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not a QI for me, not very sharp, but sharper than the previous one, may be discussed Deepugn 04:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me, the bug is quite sharp. --Basotxerri 08:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Sharpness is adequate, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 08:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Crepuscular_burnet_(Zygaena_carniolica).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Crepuscular burnet (Zygaena carniolica), Bulgaria --Charlesjsharp 22:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose not quite sharp in my opinion Deepugn 04:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment There is no trail of how and why this file ended up at CR. If you send it here, please at least leave a comment "I disagree" and sign it. Thank you. --W.carter 07:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO sharp enough. --Basotxerri 08:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support per Basotxerri. -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 08:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Orthetrum pruinosum m8440.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Orthetrum pruinosum --Vengolis 00:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unsharp. Charlesjsharp 22:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. Abdomen is fairly sharp, but since the head is unsharp, the general impression is of unsharpness. -- Ikan Kekek 08:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 08:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-08-11_TuS_Koblenz_vs._SG_Dynamo_Dresden_(DFB-Pokal)_by_Sandro_Halank–061.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sascha Horvath (SG Dynamo Dresden) and Chris Keilmann (TuS Koblenz) --Sandro Halank 09:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good shot but overexposed. Look especially at the trousers and the white background. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 12:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Spurzem. --Smial 19:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 08:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Holmen i Risør august 2017.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Holmen in Risør, Norway, august 2017.--Peulle 18:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, but its not sharp.--ArildV 18:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done True - I must have uploaded the wrong version or something. Please take a look now.--Peulle 01:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now.--ArildV 12:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed. --SKas 16:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is sharp enough but very overexposed. There is not enough contrast between the crane and the background. -- Spurzem 18:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Palauenc05 21:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? PumpkinSky 17:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Trani_BW_2016-10-14_14-17-49.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Italy, Trani, harbour --Berthold Werner 13:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Leaning to the left--Ermell 20:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.PumpkinSky 02:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree Still leaning to the left. --Ermell 06:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done It seems that Ermell was right ;-) --Berthold Werner 16:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
    •  Question The tower is still leaning to the left and the whole church as well or is that the reality?--Ermell 07:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done No, something went wrong. --Berthold Werner 11:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now -- Spurzem 18:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Large file and rather good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 08:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)