Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 14 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Koumi-line_Series110.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kiha 110 type that runs on the plateau near Kobuchisawa on the Koumi Line. --MaedaAkihiko 12:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose The train is not sharp and should be more centered. --Steindy 12:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
     Support Looks sharp enough to me. Could be tilted, can't tell from here. Prefered place of the train in the picture is subjective. (I personally like it this way.) --Trougnouf 16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per Trougnouf. --Smial 07:30, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Train looks to be climbing an incline. -- Ikan Kekek 19:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support LGTM. SHB2000 10:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 22:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Eastern_Tiger_Swallowtale_Feeding.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Eastern tiger swallowtale feeding on a lily. --John Stockla 17:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose Very little in focus. Mostly obscured. --Charlesjsharp 17:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Missing sharpness. --Steindy 11:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:20210718_Pleurotus_ostreatus_21-35.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cultivated pleurotus ostreatus (Grey Oyster Mushroom) --Zinnmann 17:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Informative, but the combination of limited DoF + artificially made background does not work in my opinion. --Nefronus 15:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
    This is a focus stacked image taken with a macro lens. There's no artificial background. Just the wall about a meter behind the growing kit. --Zinnmann 18:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
     Support Looks fine to me. Rodhullandemu 18:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality IMO. --F. Riedelio 06:49, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good quality. --Tagooty 15:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 22:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:20180512_B-1B_Lancer_Dyess_AFB_Air_Show_2018_43.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A B-1B Lancer at the Dyess AFB Air Show in May 2018. --Balon Greyjoy 06:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. Need to be a bit sharpen --Wilfredor 23:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose soft, poor light --Charlesjsharp 19:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charles. --Kallerna 17:08, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The bottom of the object is too dark. --F. Riedelio 06:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Way too dark. SHB2000 10:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)