Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 13 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Господар_зоопарку.jpg[edit]

The focus is on the shoulders so that the entire head is out of depth of field. --Аныл Озташ 19:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Ikan Kekek 05:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruskeala_quarry.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ruskeala quarry and boats, Republic of Karelia. By User:Anders98en --Florstein 06:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Underexposed. --Kallerna 09:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --MoulinoisHy 19:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Still underexposed. --Kallerna 04:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
  • @Kallerna: New version uploaded. --Florstein 13:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Also oversaturated, unsharp & small resolution. --Kallerna 11:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
    • @Kallerna: we are talking about Nikon Coolpix P7000. Please don't demand the impossible. --Florstein 16:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
      • Should we judge the image by the camera or by the image? --Kallerna 07:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
        • @Kallerna: We must to judge according to our common sense. It is ridiculous to demand from Coolpix P7000 the clarity of Z7. But good pictures can be taken with Coolpix P7000 anyway. --Florstein 08:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am surprised that nobody mentioned strange blurred spot in the center of the image, and, yes, it is not sharp enough, level of detail is insufficient for QI. --LexKurochkin 10:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very low level of detail --PantheraLeo1359531 20:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)