Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 07 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Iglesia_de_San_Juan,_Helsinki,_Finlandia,_2012-08-14,_DD_20.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination St. John's Church, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 08:27, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose IMO too noisy --Podzemnik 01:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
    I just uploaded a new version with some denoising, could we discuss it? --Poco a poco 15:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment The version from 2012 was not too bad, besides the burnt highlights in the stained windows, which obviously couldn't be repaired. The current version looks somewhat blurred. Not really better than the first, which at least looks more naturally to me. Sometimes it is better too leave dark noisy areas in the dark. --Smial 08:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
    I've made some slight changes, I don't think I can significantly improve it further that now --Poco a poco 10:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose poor lighting Seven Pandas 14:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
    What lighting do you expect inside a church? Poco a poco 14:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 Comment A contra may be too hard. But the two windows on the top right are too bright, the color does not harmonize with the other colors and the perspective is not right. Because of the brightness, two shots with different exposure would have been necessary. -- Spurzem 18:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 21:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Bilderreihe_rund_um_St._Jakob_in_Defereggen_22082018_009.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wooden bridge leading to St. Jakob in Defereggen, Austria. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 14:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Filename doesn't meet the standards for QIC.--Chianti 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC) -- P.S.: stop this automated BS with "photography" in 14 languages as "description".
     Support
    Good quality. Und was hat der Filename mit der Bildqualität zu tun? --Manfred Kuzel 16:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Bitte die Anforderungen an Qualitätsbilder lesen und verstehen. Image page requirements, item #3. Es zählen nicht nur Pixel.--Chianti 18:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Dateiname ist völlig unwichtig. --Ralf Roletschek 06:17, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sehe ich anders, ich halte es für sehr nützlich und obendrein nachnutzerfreundlich und höflich, wenn auch im Dateinamen ein paar grundlegende menschenlesbare Infos stehen. Bei mir daheim benenne ich Ordner und veröffentlichte Dateien ja schließlich auch um. Freilich finde ich "rund_um_St._Jakob_in_Defereggen" plus eigene Bildnummer vollkommen in Ordnung. --Smial 18:29, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.-- George Chernilevsky 06:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per others --Smial 18:29, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 21:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Bilderreihe_rund_um_St._Jakob_in_Defereggen_22082018_028.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Grazing cow sourrounded by nature. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Filename doesn't meet the standards for QIC.--Chianti 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I see that there a cow is grazing, even though it is not said in the file name. Who does not recognize it, can look in the picture description. -- Spurzem 20:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lothar, that´s not the point, an image is less useful if it is worse or impossible to find due to bad naming and categorization. --Milseburg 21:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Dateiname ist völlig unwichtig. --Ralf Roletschek 06:17, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
@Milseburg: Then be so nice and complete the category, as I have done now. That is probably allowed, right? -- Spurzem 07:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Is this my job too? I think no. --Milseburg 07:47, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
It is not your job; but it would be collegial. -- Spurzem 09:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support File name does matter, I wouldn't accept a QI with the title "IMG_123421.JPG". In this case though the file gives information about the location and date, which is enough IMHO Poco a poco 18:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others. --Manfred Kuzel 05:19, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)