Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives August 01 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Night_view_from_the_Jin_Mao_tower_A225399.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View from the Jin Mao tower at night --Ermell 06:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose - Nice view, but I'm finding the quality too poor for QI. I'd welcome a second opinion, though, and if this goes to CR and a consensus disagrees with me, that would be fine. -- Ikan Kekek 08:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  • A more precise criticism would help. Thanks for your review anyway --Ermell 09:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit dark but this we have often at night. ;-) Good quality -- Spurzem 16:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - More precise criticism: Unsharp, lots of color noise. -- Ikan Kekek 21:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -Per Ikan. PumpkinSky 11:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Night shots are difficult, but on the whole this one has too much noise IMO.--Peulle 13:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Opel_Kadett_C_Aero_BW_2016-09-03_13-34-21.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Opel Kadett C Aero --Berthold Werner 06:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, I don't find that we're getting much out of this composition. It's not showing the full car and nor is it depicting the insides very well since the A-pillar obscures the view. --Peulle 21:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I tried to show the open top, wich makes the Kadett to an Kadett Aero. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  SupportThe open top is very well displayed. --Ermell 19:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I didn't really understand your intentions given that the description doesn't mention such a thing ... --Peulle 14:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I hear you, Berthold, but I'm opposing, anyway, because the reflections on the left side windows are just too distracting for me to consider this a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 10:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)