Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 30 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:A_seller_of_Ice_Cream_popsicle_sleeping_on_the_shade_of_a_tree_on_a_hot_summer_day_in_Maidan,_Kolkata.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A seller of Ice Cream popsicle sleeping on the shade of a tree on a hot summer day in Maidan, Kolkata-Subhrajyoti07 12:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Photograph of identifiable people ({{Personality rights}}). --F. Riedelio 07:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Face is covered. Only upperside is visible. Not identifiable. Pl reconsider.-Subhrajyoti07 07:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO the person is identifiable although the face is partially covered. --F. Riedelio 10:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Clearly identifiable. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  • @Subhrajyoti07: If you just add a ({{Personality rights}}) template in the Summary, the objection will be taken care of. --Tagooty 03:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Waldsauerklee_Oxalis_acetosella-20220422-RM-153749.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wood anemone. Focus stack of 30 frames. --Ermell 08:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Beautiful and excellent quality. --Aristeas 09:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose for now. This is Oxalis acetosella, not Anemone nemorosa.--Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for the hint. --Ermell 14:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Now that that's resolved, this is great quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support FP-Candidate? --Smial 09:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Great quality; the typo in the German part of the file name should be fixed, however (Waldsauerklee, not Walsauerklee).--Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Info I added a rename request to the image --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Info Image renamed (here as well). --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Pallikaranai_Marsh_Residential_Complex_Sholinganallur_Apr22_D72_23211.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: East end of Pallikaranai Marsh Wetland, Residential complexes on the edge. Chennai --Tagooty 01:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 02:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. For me the photo is not sharp enough. --Steindy 15:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Steindy. --Sebring12Hrs 06:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. In full size the image appears soft, but it is printable to A4 size in acceptable quality. I can't detect any faulty camera settings and the image is not blurred due to motion blur, so the softness is obviously a problem of the used lens. These superzoom lenses are often only really useful for sensor resolutions up to about 6 MPixels, above which you can see the optical weaknesses. But it's better to upload a photo with near-native camera resolution than to scale it down to 6 MPixels just to make it look sharper in the subjective perception. --Smial 13:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
    @Steindy and Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review. I've sharpened the image. Please see the new version. --Tagooty 15:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I don't see a big difference. --Sebring12Hrs 05:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
    Sorry! Look at the houses. There is nearely no difference. --Steindy 19:27, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)