Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 28 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Sunrise_at_lake_malawi.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Malawi - sunrise at lake malawi - a fishermen in a traditional dugout --Snowmanstudios 17:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Question very pretty - are these natural colours please ? - see discussion at FPC --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment yeah, colors are natural. There are some similar images here from different lakes in East Africa --Snowmanstudios 12:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unnatural colours. --SHB2000 13:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 20:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

File:20180922_Moselle_River_Metz_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View to the Moselle River in Metz --FlocciNivis 10:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Nice photo but is it possible to bring some light\contrast to the 'dark corners' or perhaps crop to bring better focus to the colourful scene? --Scotch Mist 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done is this what you've imagined? --FlocciNivis 17:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the roof on the house now seem manipulated, see the first version of the image compared to this version. --Vasmar1 05:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Question Could you maybe give me the chance to fix the problem, when it's probably fixable (which it should be if it wasn't there in the previous version)? But I'm also not exactly sure what you mean. Could I get some more input? --FlocciNivis 19:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment Yes, sorry, I should have used the comment function, not voting function! The roof now seem squeezed, like someone trampled on it, if that makes sense :P --Vasmar1 19:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
      •  Info To clarify: See the first version of the image versus the second / third version. --Vasmar1 19:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Further to my previous comment, I see the building on the right and the tree branches above as distracting from a good quality image so would have preferred to have had the building and much (if not all) of the dark branches above cropped\removed rather than attempt to "fix" the new image! --Scotch Mist 07:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see what Vasmr1 means. There arose a destortion during the reprocessen process. --Milseburg 09:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The camera is tilted upwards very far resulting in much distortion at horizontal level. The right part shows motion blur at the branches and chromatic aberration. --August Geyler (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 11:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_Mexico,_in_April_2023_-_149.jpg[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 20:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_Mexico,_in_April_2023_-_150.jpg[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 20:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_Mexico,_in_April_2023_-_151.jpg[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 20:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)